What's new

Game thread: jazz play a game in a couple of hours, the Timberpups edition.

Explain how he does not play "winning basketball", and since you're Diamond77 I'm sure this will include an explanation on how Kanter does by some lame arbitrary criteria.

First of all I didn't mention Kanter in that phrase so I have to explain nothing.

Favors lack of passion for the game is not a news....I'm not first to say it and neither the last!
It does not seem to me that he is so hungry for winning games. He often hides or fails down the stretch. He is consistent and brings a lot of things on the table but I don't remember a game that he took over and we won. That said, I repeat that he is really a good player!

Now I want your explanation why you think that he plays winning basketball.
 
Last edited:
First of all I didn't mention Kanter in that phrase so I have to explain nothing.

Favors lack of passion for the game is not a news....I'm not first to say it and neither the last!
He does not seem to me that he is hungry enough for winning games. He often hides or fails down the stretch. He is consistent and brings a lot of things on the table but I don't remember a game that he took over and we won. That said, I repeat that he is really a good player!

Now I want your explanation why you think that he plays winning basketball.

Lol gtfo
 
First of all I didn't mention Kanter in that phrase so I have to explain nothing.

Favors lack of passion for the game is not a news....I'm not first to say it and neither the last!
He does not seem to me that he is so hungry for winning games. He often hides or fails down the stretch. He is consistent and brings a lot of things on the table but I don't remember a game that he took over and we won. That said, I repeat that he is really a good player!

Now I want your explanation why you think that he plays winning basketball.

If he lacks passion why did he go with his trainer and just shoot 300 free throws in between back to back games?
 
First of all I didn't mention Kanter in that phrase so I have to explain nothing.

Favors lack of passion for the game is not a news....I'm not first to say it and neither the last!
He does not seem to me that he is so hungry for winning games. He often hides or fails down the stretch. He is consistent and brings a lot of things on the table but I don't remember a game that he took over and we won. That said, I repeat that he is really a good player!

Now I want your explanation why you think that he plays winning basketball.

Here you go Sport:

https://www.nba.com/games/20141101/PHXUTA/gameinfo.html#nbaVideoPlayer
 
First of all I didn't mention Kanter in that phrase so I have to explain nothing.

You're not fooling anyone.

Favors lack of passion for the game is not a news....I'm not first to say it and neither the last!

Not coincidentally, you're not the first to make a stupid, baseless claim about a player and neither the last. Stop it. We all like Kanter and especially appreciate his efforts on defense lately - we don't need you making up reasons to bash on Favors to see it.
 
Real nice win. We have a nice 7-8 games going here. I just want to see it continue. Losses will come (especially if you look at our up coming schedule) but I can live with those. I just want the competitive team ball and individual improvement to continue to be evident.
 
You're not fooling anyone.



Not coincidentally, you're not the first to make a stupid, baseless claim about a player and neither the last. Stop it. We all like Kanter and especially appreciate his efforts on defense lately - we don't need you making up reasons to bash on Favors to see it.

You and your friends are obsessed by Kanter. I almost only comment the Jazz games on this board and speak about all the players without biases.

It is my personal opinion that Favors does not play winning basketball...so learn to respect the others opinion! You asked me to explain my reasons and I did it...not like you coward...where is your explanation? You have not arguments and you trot out Kanter and search for support as usual!

Did I wrote that Kanter plays winning basketball? No! I only wrote that is time for decisions and Kanter or Favors has to be traded!
 
You and your friends are obsessed by Kanter. I almost only comment the Jazz games on this board and speak about all the players without biases.

It is my personal opinion that Favors does not play winning basketball...so learn to respect the others opinion! You asked me to explain my reasons and I did it...not like you coward...where is your explanation? You have not arguments and you trout out Kanter and you search for support as usual!

Did I wrote that Kanter plays winning basketball? No!

i think its safe to say that on a team that has won 35 games in the last 113... just about nobody plays winning basketball at the moment... so... i guess im at a loss on what you are getting at
 
You and your friends are obsessed by Kanter. I almost only comment the Jazz games on this board and speak about all the players without biases.

It is my personal opinion that Favors does not play winning basketball...so learn to respect the others opinion! You asked me to explain my reasons and I did it...not like you coward...where is your explanation? You have not arguments and you trot out Kanter and search for support as usual!

You don't get the privilege of asking somebody else to prove you wrong when you make an outrageous claim such as "Favors doesn't play winning basketball/isn't passionate about the game" - the burden of proof is on you. Let's try this exercise again:

I only wrote that is time for decisions and Kanter or Favors has to be traded!

Explain why this is true, and do it without saying "Prove me wrong".
 
Goddammit, there has to be a way to take back likes. I didn't mean to like that.
 
Back
Top