What's new

Following potential 2015 draftees

My worry with Anderson is it took him until his 3rd year to break out. And while he is a great athlete, he doesn't have the tools to use it in the NBA (can't drive or get to the foul line).
 
My worry with Anderson is it took him until his 3rd year to break out. And while he is a great athlete, he doesn't have the tools to use it in the NBA (can't drive or get to the foul line).
If he could do those things, he'd be scoring 18 ppg and would be a top 5 pick. Since he isn't that player, he's a late 1st round pick and a guy who will hit the three and use his strength and athleticism to defend.
 
David Locke succinctly and convincingly explains why I want Oubre. Starts at ~12:30

https://kfanav.s3.amazonaws.com/20150209_020915-david-locke-web.mp3

I was not very high on Oubre in the beginning of the year and even in this thread I wasn't saying very nice things about him, but I'm beginning to like him, even though he still lays an egg once in a while. His length is amazing, his shooting is not terrible... but his offense creation is still kind of weak. I'd still pick Winslow and Johnson before I pick him, but I am warming up to the idea of picking Oubre if all the other wings are taken(Winslow, Johnson, Hezonja)...
 
Sorry to bust your bubble but neither Russell or Booker are wings. They are Shooting Guards in the NBA

Did you know that a shooting guard IS a wing?
 
Wings are perimeter players... You guys are overthinking this a bit.
 
A wing is a SG or a SF - it's a way to use one term to describe two positions that are often completely interchangeable. So, a combo guard like Russell can technically be called a wing, but to just call him a guard is the more appropriate/accurate description.
 
A wing is a SG or a SF - it's a way to use one term to describe two positions that are often completely interchangeable. So, a combo guard like Russell can technically be called a wing, but to just call him a guard is the more appropriate/accurate description.
Iawtp
 
Another word to describe Russell just might be GOAT, tbh.

In all seriousness though, I wonder when the last time was a freshman guard playing in a major conference was as productive as Russell has been so far - 20 ppg on 48%, 45% 3pt, 6 reb, 5 asts.

Just sick numbers.
 
Another word to describe Russell just might be GOAT, tbh.

In all seriousness though, I wonder when the last time was a freshman guard playing in a major conference was as productive as Russell has been so far - 20 ppg on 48%, 45% 3pt, 6 reb, 5 asts.

Just sick numbers.
Basketball reference goes back to the 97-98 season, and the answer to my question is that guys just don't have seasons like Russell is having. I searched all players, all classes, all conferences, and nobody has put up those numbers across the board like Russell - the elite 3pt shooting being what separates him. But even take out the three point shooting, only two guys have averaged 20, 6 and 5 over the last 17 years.
 
Back
Top