I said 16-20, but they'll have to string together a couple of 2-win streaks and maybe get a road win to get there, I think.
vs. Charlotte and vs. Milwaukee at the end of the year?
I'm still not sure what your argument is/was. Started out as "3rd-worst is better than 1st-worst" then ended at "1st-worst is ok, but only if we look somewhat respectable". Which I think that most everyone on the board agrees with. No one here is hoping that the current team is full of bad...
So you think that a 23-win team will suffer so much less long-term damage than a 20-win team that you're willing to risk dropping from a top-4 guaranteed to top-6? Going from 100% odds of a top-4 to 70% is NOT "slightly better".
Yup. The Jazz are top-3 in just about every suckstistic that you can imagine, and have all the tools necessary to not compete, but as colton is fond of saying: "you can't take anything for granite."
Agreed. When it comes time to re-sign for next year, those players who would have been on the fence following an 0-82 season would be in a much better position if they come away from this season with a few wins. With the warm fuzzies that they'll get after beating the likes of the Pelicans and...
Yes, top 4
1st: 0.250
2nd: 0.215
3rd: 0.178
4th: 0.357
5th: 0.000
But let's not get ahead of ourselves, it's a long season and the Jazz only have a one-game lead. There is still plenty of work to not do.
I don't know if these numbers mean much 8 games in (especially regarding Williams and Rush), but the table is well formatted and the concept intriguing. I give this thread a "Bobby Hansen" on a scale of CJ Miles to Karl Malone.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.