Search results

  1. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Not necessarily, I just think have a tiny lineup with bigs who don't hide the mistakes of others might be a problem. That lineup would probably be fine with Gobert behind them.
  2. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Only problem with this is then we have 3 basically PG's coming off of the bench with sub par big guys. Our defense for the second unit would be non existant.
  3. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    My definitive information comes from that if they don't make the Conley trade I don't believe they even approach him. Combine that with the very real possibility that he doesn't sign if Conley wasn't acquired. And I fully believe that no Conley = No Bogey. But I definitely didn't say that...
  4. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Fair enough, how about the quote by Loggrad that shows he mentioned the roster as a factor in him signing? And also named Conley in that same quote while not directly saying he was a factor.
  5. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Do they offer that with Crowder on the team? Unlikely. If Favors is also still on the team? Highly unlikely. Both of those things happened because of the Conley deal.
  6. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Why would they be looking at him if they didn't need that position? With Crowder on the team they had people at PF, when he got traded they needed somebody. Are the Jazz willing to give that 4th year if the position is less of a need? Do they trade Favors if they don't need the space for the...
  7. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Sure the fact that the Jazz would have had at least 2 PF's already on the roster when they were looking to sign him. When the Jazz went looking for a PF it's because they just traded Crowder for Conley, without that trade are they even looking at him? Very unlikely.
  8. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    When did I say he said that? In your own quote he mentioned Conley, and also mentioned the roster twice. That says to me the players here when he signed were a big reason he signed and that Conley was a part of that. You didn't even address that if the Jazz still had Crowder they likely...
  9. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Slim to no chance.
  10. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    Prove it. He could have stayed in Indiana. They may have tried to match the contract but he signed here quickly after the Jazz approached him. Also without the move to get Conley we aren't really looking for a PF, we still had Crowder.
  11. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    I'm in the group that believes we are going to need him in the playoffs. And I believe that the players we signed, signed with us because of the move to get Conley. If Favors and Crowder are still here, we don't go after Bogey. If Conley isn't traded to us then we are not high on the list of...
  12. gregbroncs

    Conley irrelevant...

    You are missing the point, No Conley= No Bogdanovic and probably no Mudiay. The Jazz starters with Conley were playing pretty well before he got hurt, it was the bench that was getting lit up and lost games for us. Is Conley worth 30M? No probably not, but was it worth it for Bogey, and...
  13. gregbroncs

    Jazz vs Nets 5:30 mst.

    Give the ball to bogey if they foul him he can get 20!
  14. gregbroncs

    Jazz vs Nets 5:30 mst.

    just need Bogy to hit a few and we'll have 4 guys over 20 points.
  15. gregbroncs

    Jazz vs Nets 5:30 mst.

    I would have thought higher. But I guess not.
  16. gregbroncs

    Jazz vs Nets 5:30 mst.

    Joe going for 40 tonight?
  17. gregbroncs

    Jazz vs Nets 5:30 mst.

    Do you think the coach is saying during the timeout? Somebody guard INGLES!
  18. gregbroncs

    Jazz vs Nets 5:30 mst.

    Joe 4-5 from 3 Rest of team 5-19
  19. gregbroncs

    Jazz (26-12) at Wizards (13-25), Sunday 1/12/20, 1:30pmMT, 3:30pmET

    We did beat the Clippers, and they were playing with their full roster for that game.
Back
Top