candrew
Well-Known Member
Kanter was 3-34 as a starter.
What was his ERA?
Kanter was 3-34 as a starter.
This is exactly right. Anyone that is arguing the opposite has a specious position and more than likely a trolling position.
********. Bringing two of the young guys off the bench allowed all 5 young players to get lots of shots and overall (on-ball) offensive responsibility (been over this before; this is the first time in decades that a team had 5 players under the age of 24 who all averaged 10+ field goal attempts per game). That, and lineups matter.
I agree that Burks should have played more minutes this year, and Kanter should have played more minutes last year. Other than that, Corbin did a pretty decent job with lineups and playing time this season. His real failure was getting the team to play adequate defense.
Agree. Could have shifted Marvin to SF and opened up time for Gobert (i.e. Favors plays more time at PF). Could have given some mins to Clark; why was he even signed after his summer league performance. Did Corbin like the way he could hold pom-poms?Both Marvin and RJ got more minutes per game than Kanter and Burks, and I'm pretty sure there were games when one or the other led the team in minutes played for a particular game -- that should never have happened. It prevented other guys on the bench from getting minutes and I don't mean just Kanter and Burks. That was seriously stupid considering that we're supposed to be building for the future.
Uh, no they didn't. What the ****?Both Marvin and RJ got more minutes per game than Kanter and Burks
Uh, no they didn't. What the ****?
Shocking.I didn't look up that stats.
They weren't.But it seemed to me that they were getting more minutes.
Per game ... I didn't look up that stats. But it seemed to me that they were getting more minutes. When Marvin was healthy he was getting the most minutes of the four, for sure.
Nitpick: 25.4 MPGMarvin 26.3 MPG
Nitpick: 25.4 MPG