What's new

150 Terrorists invade Oregon

Seriously?

Are you two 8 or something?


It's like running a preschool in here.
 
Seriously?

Are you two 8 or something?


It's like running a preschool in here.

Bitchstapo strikes again. (this isnt polite!) many of your comments are not ok. I would advise you to cool off!
I've been polite. I even stopped before going off on him. I don't know what more you want.

edit: I don't know what more a reasonable, responsible moderator could ask of me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bitchstapo strikes again.

I've been polite. I even stopped before going off on him. I don't know what more you want.

edit: I don't know what more a reasonable, responsible moderator could ask of me.

Put him on ignore. and report him and it will be looked at.
 
Bitchstapo strikes again.

I've been polite. I even stopped before going off on him. I don't know what more you want.

edit: I don't know what more a reasonable, responsible moderator could ask of me.
Petty arguments going on between:
NAOS and Roach
NAOS and Hack
NAOS and Cy
NAOS and Joe

What could the problem possibly be?
 
Petty arguments going on between:
NAOS and Roach
NAOS and Hack
NAOS and Cy
NAOS and Joe

What could the problem possibly be?

lol. 3 of the 4 came at me.

I'm just trying to help Roach start his militia (which is a great idea, right??).
 
lol. 3 of the 4 came at me.

I'm just trying to help Roach start his militia (which is a great idea, right??).
Our current exchange started when you made a dig related to things I said months ago regarding economics. It was very similar in nature to what you said to Roach above (which I don't understand the background on). I don't know exactly what your beef is with each individual here, but I do know that I have seen you play the part of condescending jerk repeatedly.
 
Petty arguments going on between:
NAOS and Roach
NAOS and Hack
NAOS and Cy
NAOS and Joe

What could the problem possibly be?
Didn't he recently get after one love for saying something was amazing? Doesn't get much more petty than that.

And those are just the current arguments naos has going with people.
The amount of past petty arguments between naos and others is unfathomable
 
Our current exchange started when you made a dig related to things I said months ago regarding economics. It was very similar in nature to what you said to Roach above (which I don't understand the background on). I don't know exactly what your beef is with each individual here, but I do know that I have seen you play the part of condescending jerk repeatedly.

it's only a problem because you and Roach have zero ability to laugh at the things you write. It's seriously like you're putting your heart out there. It's hard to forget the stinkers you guys have put out there on the internet... impossible when you guard them like first-born children.
 
it's only a problem because you and Roach have zero ability to laugh at the things you write. It's seriously like you're putting your heart out there. It's hard to forget the stinkers you guys have put out there on the internet... impossible when you guard them like first-born children.
Oh right, because once you weigh in on the opposite side of the argument we should just consider our own opinions to be idiotic and laughable. Stick it where the sun don't shine, you loser.
 
it's only a problem because you and Roach have zero ability to laugh at the things you write. It's seriously like you're putting your heart out there. It's hard to forget the stinkers you guys have put out there on the internet... impossible when you guard them like first-born children.
BTW, this post is an admission that at least 2 of the four arguments were started by you. And Fish brought up the OneLove one. He provoked that by using the word "amazing"? I'm not sure how the Cy and Hack problems started, but it would not surprise me in the least to learn that you played a role.
 
Oh right, because once you weigh in on the opposite side of the argument we should just consider our own opinions to be idiotic and laughable. Stick it where the sun don't shine, you loser.

BTW, this post is an admission that at least 2 of the four arguments were started by you. And Fish brought up the OneLove one. He provoked that by using the word "amazing"? I'm not sure how the Cy and Hack problems started, but it would not surprise me in the least to learn that you played a role.

your life seems hard
 
Double Down

So nobody has called me for my help or asked me to come to "Burns". What a great name for the place in this case.

Just strikes me that if these hoodies were black and with a list of grievances from how the guvmint has clipped their operations with specific intentional insults to what they consider their rights to be like what they factually could put out there, our media with the race war yellow journalism of late would be cheering them on like, oh, half a dozen places where outside groups of agitators have come in to stir the fire.

I don't see the assembly of the fedbusters at the wildlife refuge is a plus for ranchers. Just go home, homies.

Obama should commute the minimum sentencing part of their jail time, which the folks are gonna turn themselves in for, because they are willing to be subject to the law of this land. We have too many nonviolent offenders in the jails as it is.

They lit some fires in some heavy stands of grass near their ranch, using a well-known and approved management technique called "controlled burn", which the guvmint uses all the time when they figure there is a need. What is at stake here is the guvmint's discretion for doing or not doing as the managers please. It is a real problem. No local input on these policies. No nice guy on the guvmint end of the phone line saying "We'll look into it" with a realistic chance they will address your concerns.

They could have plowed some firebreaks inside their property line, and could have solved their problem or at least reduced their risk.

redneck pushback gone amok.
 
Back
Top