What's new
By:

2015 Annual JazzFanz All-Time NBA Draft

White Chocolate had to go to work

Via proxy, he selects

PG: Bob Cousy

[video=youtube_share;o-xa6546ixc]https://youtu.be/o-xa6546ixc

6× NBA champion (1957, 1959-1963)
NBA Most Valuable Player (1957)
13× NBA All-Star (1951–1963)
2× NBA All-Star Game MVP (1954, 1957)
10× All-NBA First Team (1952–1961)
2× All-NBA Second Team (1962, 1963)
8× NBA assists leader (1953-1960)
NBA 25th Anniversary Team
NBA 35th Anniversary Team
NBA's 50th Anniversary All-Time Team
No. 14 retired by Boston Celtics
NCAA champion (1947)
Consensus first-team All-American (1950)
No. 17 retired by Holy Cross
 
White chocolate selects

C: Willis Reed

2× NBA champion (1970, 1973)
2× NBA Finals MVP (1970, 1973)
NBA Most Valuable Player (1970)
7× NBA All-Star (1965–1971)
NBA All-Star Game MVP (1970)
All-NBA First Team (1970)
4× All-NBA Second Team (1967–1969, 1971)
NBA All-Defensive First Team (1970)
NBA Rookie of the Year (1965)
NBA All-Rookie First Team (1965)
NBA 50th Anniversary All-Time Team
No. 19 retired by New York Knicks
 
TFivas selects the STEAL of the draft and truly questions all of our intelligence that he still around.......


93215ea940941e9c4943a5b7c0ed535d.jpg




Bernard King SF
 
Last edited:
Thee jazz fan said:
Ya. This has been an odd draft. Bernard King and Cousy this late?
Click to expand...

In previous years with this thing the true best teams had a mix of old and new, since really that is the best mix. I would take many of the older players over the newer, and I think the talent level and results hold out. The problem is the voters go "no wait, I watched Dwight Howard dunk with a superman cape. Bill Russell is always in black and white. Howard is obviously better, duh." or "you know I heard they exaggerated everything back then. I heard Wilt was really only 6'6" and they just said 7'2", obviously the players today are so much bigger and stronger there is no way Wilt can be better than today's center, he would get destroyed." and then vote wrong. So this year I think many of us are trying to assemble teams that can be voted to win, not necessarily the strongest teams possible.

And there is the fun factor which is why I went for a blockbuster trade. Just to spice it up a bit.
 
LogGrad98 said:
In previous years with this thing the true best teams had a mix of old and new, since really that is the best mix. I would take many of the older players over the newer, and I think the talent level and results hold out. The problem is the voters go "no wait, I watched Dwight Howard dunk with a superman cape. Bill Russell is always in black and white. Howard is obviously better, duh." or "you know I heard they exaggerated everything back then. I heard Wilt was really only 6'6" and they just said 7'2", obviously the players today are so much bigger and stronger there is no way Wilt can be better than today's center, he would get destroyed." and then vote wrong. So this year I think many of us are trying to assemble teams that can be voted to win, not necessarily the strongest teams possible.

And there is the fun factor which is why I went for a blockbuster trade. Just to spice it up a bit.
Click to expand...
Last year I pretty much did this and got destroyed. I was confused how I could get blasted like that, and the consensus was my players weren't established enough.

My lineup was Nash PG Durant Davis and Hakeem



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top