What's new
By:

2016 Draft Workouts!

Cunning Linguist said:
"Zizic's lack of finesse is perhaps most notably demonstrated in his passing ability, which is extremely unrefined to say the least right now. He looks like a bull in a china shop at times, dishing out just 14 assists in 629 minutes on the season thus far, or one every 45 minutes he's on the floor. Compare his paltry 4.9% assist percentage with his very high 19.5% turnover rate, and it's safe to say he is somewhat of a black hole at this stage of his development." - DX

Good call, dumbass.
Click to expand...
Maybe I'm remembering the wrong player's video.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
Holy **** Zipser looks good. IDGAF that he's 22. Good length, athleticism, defense, offensive versatility, can take guys off the dribble and attack, shoot the three, great percentages from everywhere. Seriously, this kid sounds flawless.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Holy **** Zipser looks good. IDGAF that he's 22. Good length, athleticism, defense, offensive versatility, can take guys off the dribble and attack, shoot the three, great percentages from everywhere. Seriously, this kid sounds flawless.
Click to expand...
Hernagonez better tho

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Holy **** Zipser looks good. IDGAF that he's 22. Good length, athleticism, defense, offensive versatility, can take guys off the dribble and attack, shoot the three, great percentages from everywhere. Seriously, this kid sounds flawless.
Click to expand...
I remember the first time I saw him. I think I was watching Pleiss last summer and noticed Zipser - NBA athlete, good size, could shoot it. But apparently didn't always produce like expected from a guy with those physical tools and skills.
 
Sleeper: Wes Washpun from Northern Iowa. He's a PG, which we don't really need, but his advanced stats are awesome, kinda like Norman Powell. He's only 6'1 or so, but has a 6'8 wingspan + 40" vert. Really athletic. Not a great 3-pt shooter, but still managed 91 unassisted makes at the rim on 379 attempts. That's really freaking good, especially with his FTr. Also did decent on mid range shots, and he's a pretty good defender.

Remember the name.
 
So there's this big narrative that DMurray gets to the rim at will, and I've also seen some people say that Baldwin can't get there or finish (legit concerns btw).

Taking out put backs, Baldwin had 47 unassisted makes at the rim, DMurray had 50. Not a huge difference. Couple that with high turnovers and a 48 TS% and Murray scares me. I love his talent, and his highlights, but his IQ really scares me and I don't think you can fix that. I wish he had another year in college to see how he improves...he's really risky IMO.
 
#bern said:
So there's this big narrative that DMurray gets to the rim at will, and I've also seen some people say that Baldwin can't get there or finish (legit concerns btw).

Taking out put backs, Baldwin had 47 unassisted makes at the rim, DMurray had 50. Not a huge difference. Couple that with high turnovers and a 48 TS% and Murray scares me. I love his talent, and his highlights, but his IQ really scares me and I don't think you can fix that. I wish he had another year in college to see how he improves...he's really risky IMO.
Click to expand...

The other main problem with Baldwin in a half court setting is his struggles both getting to, and finishing, in the paint, struggles which exist for a multitude of reasons. Baldwin is fast when he has built up a head of steam, something which becomes evident in transition, but he lacks the elite burst to turn the corner on a defender in the half court, and struggles to get into the paint because of it. He doesn't offset this with an overly advanced dribble, either, and doesn't change speeds, or direction, quite as well as you would want in a primary ball handler. Finally, when Baldwin gets into the paint he has only average explosiveness around the hoop, and his lack of a consistent in-between game --- both in the form of pull-up jump shot or a floater in the lane – makes game planning against him relatively easy for a defense.
 
He can also get sloppy with a handle that all too frequently is high and off balance, which both limits his ability to turn the corner, but also makes him prone to being stripped of the ball more often he ideally would, and overall his 3.6 turnovers per 40 minutes, pace adjusted, is the second worst mark among point guards in our top-100 rankings, are a clear area in need of improvement.
Click to expand...

This dude is going to get ripped in the NBA if they ask him to bring the ball up the court vs pressure. Neto would eat his lunch.
 
And can we stop this narrative that Baldwin is some super high IQ player? He is pretty average in that department.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top