What's new
By:

2017 Annual JazzFanz All-Time NBA Draft

JustTheTip said:
Sounds like Barkley, if Barkley couldn't rebound as much.

;)
Click to expand...

But he can, sooo not sure what the point of your post was, and let's not forget that he may not have looked it, he was athletic with a long reach he is longfrom foot to hand, so his length is deceiving. He could also shoot. Dantley was strictly 10-15 feet and in on offense and a huge liability on defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thee jazz fan said:
But he can, sooo not sure what the point of your post was, and let's not forget that he may not have looked it, he was athletic with a long reach he is longfrom foot to hand, so his length is deceiving. He could also shoot. Dantley was strictly 10-15 feet and in on offense and a huge liability on defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It was a joke, hence the winky face. Cmon man.

I have to say though, after all your talk about how Draymond isn't a good shooter, I'm shocked to see you say that Barkley could shoot.

Now Barkley shot a lot, but not very well. He only shot above 30% from 3 twice in his career, with his high being 33%. And he was a bad defender.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Those are facts


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Lol, no. He was a SF not a PF. So that fact is incorrect.

He was widely considered an elite shooter. He was often referred to as having the smoothest shot ever seen in the NBA. Not sure where you pulled that one from. He didnt really shoot the three much but that doesnt mean he wasnt a great shooter. He was a deadly mid range shooter. One of the best scoring players ever.

He was the scoring leader in the NBA 2 season in a row and scored more than 30 points per game 4 seasons in a row on extremely efficient numbers. He set the NBA record for least shot attempts to average more than 30 points per game.

In those playoffs he averaged more than 30 points per game on better than 50% shooting and also reeled in 7.5 rebounds and dished out 4.2 assists per game.

He lead the Utah Jazz to their first ever NBA playoffs and won some series for them. He was also a key member on some of the bad boy Detroit teams late in his career.

Im not sure what else you could ask for out of a 6th man. An athletic elite scorer who was a great shooter and could run plays through since he could also set up teammates.

He was criticized early with the Jazz for being selfish and not playing defense but he turned that around and turned the Jazz franchise around.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JD8S1WC7Gc4
 
JustTheTip said:
It was a joke, hence the winky face. Cmon man.

I have to say though, after all your talk about how Draymond isn't a good shooter, I'm shocked to see you say that Barkley could shoot.

Now Barkley shot a lot, but not very well. He only shot above 30% from 3 twice in his career, with his high being 33%. And he was a bad defender.
Click to expand...





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
JustTheTip said:
Good pick.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Rose was so dominant for such a short period, it is hard to place him. But since this tournament is using players during their peak year, it seemed like a good pick.

Kidd and Rose at the 1 will be a nightmare to defend, based on size, strength, athleticism and skill.
 
JustTheTip said:
It was a joke, hence the winky face. Cmon man.

I have to say though, after all your talk about how Draymond isn't a good shooter, I'm shocked to see you say that Barkley could shoot.

Now Barkley shot a lot, but not very well. He only shot above 30% from 3 twice in his career, with his high being 33%. And he was a bad defender.
Click to expand...

I never said Chuck was great or anything. Just that he could shoot, much like Green can. I would say though that Barkley's midrange game was miles ahead of Green


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top