The Fresh Prince
Well-Known Member
I've done a JazzFanz draft before, and I remember how biased everything was. The entire forum had a hard on for Tyson Chandler and voted the guy who had that team the winner lmao.
@Thee Idiotic Minivan K toddychurch picked Iso Joe.Did my Joe Johnson pick go through?
And plus a lot of these guys getting drafted from the 70's-80's, like 85-90% of the forum may have never even seen them play so you could have some guys that were kickass back in their day, but because people never seen them play you lose the tournament solely based off of lack of general knowledge of the players.I’d prefer relying on a sim more this year
Every point of analysis contains some bias, though. Teams that didn’t make it a point to stack players with gawdy production are at a competitive disadvantage. Maybe the 2k people actually gave proper balance to defensive impact, unselfishness, locker room dynamics, passing (that doesn’t always show up in assists), but that sounds like a monumental achievement since the game is so dynamic.I've done a JazzFanz draft before, and I remember how biased everything was. The entire forum had a hard on for Tyson Chandler and voted the guy who had that team the winner lmao.
So some want a vote others want a sim let’s do a sim champ and Vote champ. Sim first, winner is sim champ. Sim will also count as seeding for the voteNah I'm not cool with leaving a series in the judges hands. I'd rather see the games played out.
A lot of people here hate Iverson so on that note I'm already screwed lol
I’ll get that for you.Did my Joe Johnson pick go through?
Every point of analysis contains some bias, though. Teams that didn’t make it a point to stack players with gawdy production are at a competitive disadvantage. Maybe the 2k people actually gave proper balance to defensive impact, unselfishness, locker room dynamics, passing (that doesn’t always show up in assists), but that sounds like a monumental achievement since the game is so dynamic.
As it stands, a sim makes me think that whoever has Wilt Chamberlain or Michael Jordan will just win. Or a team with Oscar Robertson and Allen Iverson.
The least biased route would be balancing biases against each other.
I like 70% because it's many times a popularity contestIs everyone good with this?
We could try to get that hawks fan to put it to a vote on his site? Good idea?Mabye we have the winner of the sim and the winner of the vote go up against eachother rob some other way
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Go watch people do All time Player Sims on YouTube. Most that I've seen Jordan and Wilt usually never win championships on their squads. You're undermining the accuracy of 2k.Every point of analysis contains some bias, though. Teams that didn’t make it a point to stack players with gawdy production are at a competitive disadvantage. Maybe the 2k people actually gave proper balance to defensive impact, unselfishness, locker room dynamics, passing (that doesn’t always show up in assists), but that sounds like a monumental achievement since the game is so dynamic.
As it stands, a sim makes me think that whoever has Wilt Chamberlain or Michael Jordan will just win. Or a team with Oscar Robertson and Allen Iverson.
The least biased route would be balancing biases against each other.
I'm selecting Joe Dumars
Kidd
Dumars
Melo
Barkley
Wilt
6th man Lillard
Honestly, that team though...
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Not bad. Prime Kidd was a monster, and he's a force on 2k.I'm selecting Joe Dumars
Kidd
Dumars
Melo
Barkley
Wilt
6th man Lillard
Honestly, that team though...
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Nope, you’re first five selections have to start.
I thought they were just locks for being picked. Like you can't trade them. I didn't see where you can't make lineups adjustments.Nope, you’re first five selections have to start.
No they don’t.Nope, you’re first five selections have to start.