3 on 3
- Thread starter Stoked
- Start date
Burks for the athletic ability and creating.
Mo-Will for the shooting.
Favors for defense.
Mo-Will for the shooting.
Favors for defense.
I thought of that but decided to go with Hayward over Mo Williams. I just liked the idea of two players that can break anything down.
I actually think 3on3 bball might better suit the playing styles of the "superstar" players. It would probably make for better team chemistry when you've got a guy like Carmelo or Kobe needing the ball all the time. There would be much more room to work. I really do wonder if basketball wouldn't be better played 3on3.
Anyway, I picked Favors, Hayward, an Mo Williams. Mo just because I'm a Burks hater.
Anyway, I picked Favors, Hayward, an Mo Williams. Mo just because I'm a Burks hater.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
I said Favors, Marvin, and Mo.
For 3 on 3's I want defense and athleticism. Both Marvin and Favors can lock you down defensively, and are athletic as anyone in the league, Mo can get them the ball, and can flat out shoot.
For 3 on 3's I want defense and athleticism. Both Marvin and Favors can lock you down defensively, and are athletic as anyone in the league, Mo can get them the ball, and can flat out shoot.
-Favors because of sheer physical ability (at least)
-Millsap because he can play as a perimeter player or as a big, also the best and most versatile player the Jazz have. Knows the game, knows how to play with others. (Captain)
-Hayward because he's the most skilled and biggest perimeter player the jazz have
You can switch basically everything with this lineup as well.
-Millsap because he can play as a perimeter player or as a big, also the best and most versatile player the Jazz have. Knows the game, knows how to play with others. (Captain)
-Hayward because he's the most skilled and biggest perimeter player the jazz have
You can switch basically everything with this lineup as well.
Burks, Favors, and Sap. Please prepare to lose to my team.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
I thought of Al for those same reasons, decided to go with Favors instead, because in 3 on 3 athletes just have more success. Plus if Al was forced to guard James or Anthony or someone like that, Al would be screwed.
bjunior
Well-Known Member
why?
3 on 3 basketball is mostly pick n rolls, which is why I would never pick Al.
My picks and my reasoning.
that's what I was thinking.
I don't know the new players though, and Hayward instead of Burks might make sense for the height in 3on3, good point on the switchin.
addictionary
Well-Known Member
Favors, Kanter & Burks.
Because everyone else is on his nuts so hard and in the end what I've seen is a guy that goes out there and gets his own above and beyond everything else. Oh yeah, that and he's got a lot of chucker in him.
I am hopeful that he will mold more into a team player this year. Not basing this off anything. Just my hopes for him. It is to soon to be down on him in my opinion.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Ahearn for shooting, Fransisco Elson for leadership, and Marcus 'Koozahn' Cousin for size down low
I'm not so sure. I think a team of Lebron, Wade and Bosh would give them problems.
margodydek
Well-Known Member
Apologies if it was already mentioned, but you guys know FIBA's proposing adding 3v3 to the Olympics in Brazil, right? And from what I've heard, the idea is gaining steam.