What's new
By:

39-43

Sloanfeld

Sloanfeld

Banned
Ahhhhh, I stil remember all of the fools at the start of the season who kept saying that this season's Jazz was better than last season's. I told you that record was not an accurate measuring tool for this type of thing. You didn't listen, AGAIN.

I'm right in both arguments here. Let's review for newcomers, and to point out people's foolishness.

My argument was:

You can't use record to measure this because the Jazz played average for half of last season, and elite ball for the second half.

The delusional, Boozer hating morons argument:

Jazz have a better record at this point in the season, so we are better than last season's team!!!!


What's funny about my argument is that the reverse happened this year (good start, bad finish), but the blind fools chose to ignore what happened the previous season, as I had warned them, and didn't realize it until the losses started piling up.

So what can we conclude from all of this?

1. I'm always right

2. Delusional, Boozer hating (#1 seed, best defensive team in the league) morons are always wrong

3. You know what three is, Sloanfidels
 
Bulls did well without Boozer when he was hurt. Nuf said. Wait, not enuf said. When the Jazz had Boozer, they aslso did well without him. Great stats, doesnt affect winning or losing too much. That is Noah and Rose's job. Just reality. Boozer doesnt suck. But he is a 2nd or 3rd, at best option, and not a deal breaker for any team to do well.
 
Sloanfeld said:
Ahhhhh, I stil remember all of the fools at the start of the season who kept saying that this season's Jazz was better than last season's. I told you that record was not an accurate measuring tool for this type of thing. You didn't listen, AGAIN.

I'm right in both arguments here. Let's review for newcomers, and to point out people's foolishness.

My argument was:

You can't use record to measure this because the Jazz played average for half of last season, and elite ball for the second half.

The delusional, Boozer hating morons argument:

Jazz have a better record at this point in the season, so we are better than last season's team!!!!


What's funny about my argument is that the reverse happened this year (good start, bad finish), but the blind fools chose to ignore what happened the previous season, as I had warned them, and didn't realize it until the losses started piling up.

So what can we conclude from all of this?

1. I'm always right

2. Delusional, Boozer hating (#1 seed, best defensive team in the league) morons are always wrong

3. You know what three is, Sloanfidels
Click to expand...
Yawn - just go be a Bull's fan. NO ONE WILL MISS YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Give it a rest. Your snuggle bunny is gone. You ought to take your fandom of his perfectly groomed armpit hair to the Windy City.
 
boozers sucks sloanfield sucks im a boozfield hater that is all
 
LOL; the media still loves Boozer; camereaman couldn't take his camera off Boozer on the bench during timeouts tonite...
 
I'll admit, I still love the Booze.

Just the same, I completely expect him to break his vajayjay in game 1 and miss the rest of the playoffs.
 
You really think Boozer would have made that much of a difference this year over Jefferson?

Boozer would have led the way after Sloan resigns, DWill is traded for a rookie, draft picks & a PG(who missed a lot of games with the Jazz), and all the injuries?
 
I think on the fateful night when Sloan and Johnson resigned that our record was not that much worse than the Bulls. Now the Bulls have the best record in the league. Obviously both teams went in different directions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top