39-43

[freakazoid]

Utah never assumed he was a back up. Still wish he was here but no way was he viewed as anything but a starter.

Right. That contract was absolutely ridiculous for a starter at the 2.

Pg = 14 million

SF = 17 million

C = 13 million

PF = 6.7 Million

Yeah, I guess it's pretty silly to assume Utah thought 5.7 million was too much for a starter. My bad.

 

[freakazoid]

Yeah and we could have drafted Jefferson and Josh Smith to. Hindsight is exactly that, already gone. At the time almost every GM in the league thought that offer sheet to Wes was ridiculous. And I agreed with them.

Duh. You mean every GM except Rich Cho.

I still don't think he is worth the contract he got.)

Put out or get out.

 

[Sloanfeld]

Final PER.

Jefferson 20.20 - 82 games played
Millsap 19.83 - 76 games played
Bozo 18.90 - 59 games played

One more time, just for emphasis.

After Deron was dealt Jefferson became the main man. PER means nothing for comparisons sake. It's just like LeBron, without looking, I would assume this his PER was down this season from his previous MVP season, because he had to share the load with other superstars. Boozer was never the main man on Chicago.

Did you happen to notice that the Jazz completely revamped their team mid-season? Thus making your comparison and "victory" meaningless?

That was kind of my argument all season, that you can't base this comparison on the record. I'm just doing what Vinyfool and his gang of clowns were doing to me at the start of the season. I guess you have trouble comprehending stuff.

You really think Boozer would have made that much of a difference this year over Jefferson?

Boozer would have led the way after Sloan resigns, DWill is traded for a rookie, draft picks & a PG(who missed a lot of games with the Jazz), and all the injuries?

Doubt any of that happens if we had Boozer.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

Doubt any of that happens if we had Boozer.

You may be right, but then again we would have had to spend yet another season looking at that self-absorbed, overly manscaped, injury nursing pansy. And if you're right, by your own admission we would have enjoyed several more years as a mediocre team. Thanks to the blow up that your boy would have somehow prevented, Utah has a very exciting future. I'm sure you'll be sticking around for the next five years to remind us step by step how much we ought to miss Loozer, but it's pretty clear that most fans are happy he's gone.

 

[LogGrad98]

Doubt any of that happens if we had Boozer.

Doubt that Boozer's 50 games would have made more of a difference than AJ's 80.

 

[Sloanfeld]

Doubt that Boozer's 50 games would have made more of a difference than AJ's 80.

You can't determine how many games Boozer would have played had he been on the Jazz. This argument is so weak.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

You can't determine how many games Boozer would have played had he been on the Jazz. This argument is so weak.

Yeah LogGrad! What makes you think that just because Boozer didn't show up to play for Chicago on a lot of the nights that he wouldn't have shown up to play for Utah? History shows that while he was on our team he always laced 'em up if he could find a way... errr. Never mind.

And besides, do you think he would have tripped over that bag in Chicago if he'd been here in Salt Lake? What a silly argument. That was just a bizarre and unfortunate incident and by no means further evidence of a long and established pattern. Sheesh.

 

[7StraightIsGreat]

You can't determine how many games Boozer would have played had he been on the Jazz. This argument is so weak.

That's really not a weak argument. You could simply use the law of averages in regards to Booz and his track record of missing games.

 

[Sloanfeld]

That's really not a weak argument. You could simply use the law of averages in regards to Booz and his track record of missing games.

The past is not always an indicator of future events.

 

[My2Cents]

The past is not always an indicator of future events.

Maybe not, but Bozo averaged 59 games a season for the Jazz. How many games did he play for the Bulls this year?

 

[Bronco70]

You can't determine how many games Boozer would have played had he been on the Jazz. This argument is so weak.

The past is not always an indicator of future events.

The problem here, sloany, is that you somehow feel justified in arguing for Bozzer using assumptions and conjecture, yet you demand nothing less than empirical evidence for any argument against him.

Perhaps if you could fix this disparity, people would consider taking you seriously.

Perhaps.

 

[Kyoto]

The problem here, sloany, is that you somehow feel justified in arguing for Bozzer using assumptions and conjecture, yet you demand nothing less than empirical evidence for any argument against him.

Perhaps if you could fix this disparity, people would consider taking you seriously.

Perhaps.

This I doubt.

 

[//r00t 4 Jazz]

How about you go bug Collin Cowheard, he said the reason he's not picking the Bulls is Boozer and a team with him as a focal point wont win a ring, that's far worse then what most here say about Boozer here. Well other then the made up slights perceived in your head.

 

[LogGrad98]

The past is not always an indicator of future events.

The problem here, sloany, is that you somehow feel justified in arguing for Bozzer using assumptions and conjecture, yet you demand nothing less than empirical evidence for any argument against him.

Perhaps if you could fix this disparity, people would consider taking you seriously.

Perhaps.

Yeah this is pretty much all Sloanfeld uses to argue for Boozer. Boozer had a good statistical year here, so he would obviously be better than AJ. Boozer was on a team with Deron and the rest, so obviously if Boozer had stayed, so would Deron et al. the team with Boozer on it did better than this years team so obviously if Boozer had been on this years team it would have been better.

All of that is using the past as an indicator of future events.



Wow Sloanfield getting slowned left and right in this thread.

 

[Scorpjazz]

Maybe not, but Bozo averaged 59 games a season for the Jazz. How many games did he play for the Bulls this year?

Pwned.

 

[Gyp Rosetti]

The past is not always an indicator of future events.

So you're saying that just because your mom was pro-life, that doesn't mean that there's not a possibility that you and your future wife may lean more pro-choice and possibly prevent future Sloanfidorks?

 

[Sloanfeld]

The problem here, sloany, is that you somehow feel justified in arguing for Bozzer using assumptions and conjecture, yet you demand nothing less than empirical evidence for any argument against him.

Perhaps if you could fix this disparity, people would consider taking you seriously.

Perhaps.

I've compiled many a post filled with statistics and detailing how Boozer helped our offense AND defense. Of course, all you see is the stupid replies from the same idiots in every topic and just go along with that. (reverse trolling, btw)

 

[LogGrad98]

The past is not always an indicator of future events.

I've compiled many a post filled with statistics and detailing how Boozer helped our offense AND defense. Of course, all you see is the stupid replies from the same idiots in every topic and just go along with that. (reverse trolling, btw)

Helped.

Past tense.

Past is not an indicator of future events.

Ok since you seem to be really that dense, I fixed the first quote for you. Now you can say SUBMIT TO SLOANFIELD or whatever, secure in your delusions of adequacy.

The past is not always an indicator of future events. Unless I am using Boozer's past performance, excluding any time he may have actually missed due to injury, to "prove" he would have without doubt kept the team together, and would have been MVP, and would have of a surety lead the Jazz to a championship this year.

 

[Sloanfeld]

Helped.

Past tense.

Past is not an indicator of future events.

Ok since you seem to be really that dense, I fixed the first quote for you. Now you can say SUBMIT TO SLOANFIELD or whatever, secure in your delusions of adequacy.

I used to think you were a complete moron but now I can't tell if you are just messing with me or really believe some of the garbage that you type.

Boozer consistently hepled our team, that wasn't going to change. You don't just lose all your basketball skills. Injuries are totally random. You can't compare these things. It's like comparing one's annual salary with their investments in the stock market. One will be consistent, the other will fluctuate.

 

[LogGrad98]

It is stuff you yourself typed. Did you forget typing that if Boozer were here this year Deron wouldn't have left? Yep that was you. Did you forget typing that with Boozer we would have been a better team? Yep that was you too. And neither of them had anything to do with Boozer's stats. Also Boozer's stats dropped off this year. Did you account for that? AJ had a better year all around, especially defensively. Did you account for that?

I used to think you were just messing around, but it is literally always the same thing with you. Always. The same. Now I know you are just a complete moron. You type whatever comes to your mind then when you are called on it you take off on tangents to "prove" you are right yet again. Then you end it all with "SUBMIT TO SLOANFIELD" or something equally inane. It is old and worn out. Move on to something else for once.