A Place for Conservatives
- Thread starter Heathme
- Start date
idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
Heathme
Guest
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying you're good with Google displaying pretty much liberal sites only?
Getting Traded
Banned
Google is playing ball with the Deep State. Whether they're liberal in orientation or not, they're still playing the autocratic card, as you probably would agree, just from the other side of the fence.
Jonah
Well-Known Member
If you like the phrase "Deep State” and believe in it, that’s fine. It’s also one of Trump’s favorite buzz phrases. I prefer the more benign “establishment” as it’s more accurate and in line with my own views. Deep State means a sinister shadow government that operates behind the scenes, essentially making our democracy a sham, whereas establishment conveys a less conspiratorial view that those in power, whether they be politicians or bureaucrats, use their power to perpetuate the status quo: a corporate based economy with a neoconservative or interventionist foreign policy.
I look forward to Conservatives building their own "neutral" search engine.
JazzyFresh
Banned
I really don't care for this Google stuff but this just actually happened to me. I was reading a story on ESPN about a football player that is retiring. He let out his reasoning and I thought it was a tweet so I searched his name and Twitter to read it again. The results? A bunch of anti-Trump and political garbage. What does any of this have to do with "Richard Matthews Twitter"?
https://www.google.com/search?clien....564...33i299k1j30i10k1j33i10k1.0.6302h5o-hcQ
https://www.google.com/search?clien....564...33i299k1j30i10k1j33i10k1.0.6302h5o-hcQ
Heathme
Guest
Hannity’s Judicial Watch Scoop: Where’s the Rest of the Media?
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...nnitys-judicial-watch-scoop-wheres-rest-media
So as I sat in a television studio in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania ready to beam in on Thursday night’s Sean Hannity show, I checked my notes.
The topic was to be the media and President Trump’s visit to El Paso. The format was, first, a Hannity monologue, then the segue to the opening El Paso segment, where I would be paired with Dr. Sebastian Gorka, the former Trump White House aide and now host of The Sebastian Gorka Show.
In the world of cable news, completely normal.
Then, through my earpiece, I hear Sean’s inimitable voice opening the show — and was quickly amazed. He decidedly was not talking El Paso.
His opening was about the brand-new release by Judicial Watch of just-obtained Justice Department documents that quite vividly illustrated what a Fox News account would later headline as follows: “FBI kept using Steele dossier for FISA applications despite documenting ex-spy's bias, documents show”
This, I knew in a blink, was blockbuster news. Judicial Watch had finally gotten its hands on what in bureaucratic language are called “302s” — summaries of FBI interviews. In this case the 302s were with Russia Hoax Justice Department official Bruce Ohr — he both the Obama-era Associate Deputy Attorney General (who inexplicably is still in some now-demoted post at Justice) and the husband of Nellie Ohr.
Mrs. Ohr, it had earlier been discovered, was an employee of the shady Fusion GPS firm that played a key role in the creation and financing of the infamous “Steele dossier” — a decided work of fiction that falsely attributed all kinds of imagined sins and nefarious deeds to Donald Trump and his supposed dalliance with Russians. And was then used to obtain FISA warrants — a decided case of using a fraudulent document to open an FBI investigation targeting the Trump campaign.
It was quickly apparent that my segment was going to be gone with the wind and, sure enough, it was cancelled. No problem with me. I have been intently following what has evolved over the last two-plus years into what effectively amounted to a soft-coup attempt by Deep State bureaucrats.
As often happens in the world of cable news, what only hours earlier was Topic A — the whole El Paso/Dayton tragedy in this case — had quickly been replaced by Topic Z, another topic entirely that was thrust into the spotlight because of new revelations.
There, all of a sudden, was Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton, whose constant legal badgering for once confidential government documents through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests had finally unearthed this treasure trove of new information.
Click link above to read more.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...nnitys-judicial-watch-scoop-wheres-rest-media
So as I sat in a television studio in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania ready to beam in on Thursday night’s Sean Hannity show, I checked my notes.
The topic was to be the media and President Trump’s visit to El Paso. The format was, first, a Hannity monologue, then the segue to the opening El Paso segment, where I would be paired with Dr. Sebastian Gorka, the former Trump White House aide and now host of The Sebastian Gorka Show.
In the world of cable news, completely normal.
Then, through my earpiece, I hear Sean’s inimitable voice opening the show — and was quickly amazed. He decidedly was not talking El Paso.
His opening was about the brand-new release by Judicial Watch of just-obtained Justice Department documents that quite vividly illustrated what a Fox News account would later headline as follows: “FBI kept using Steele dossier for FISA applications despite documenting ex-spy's bias, documents show”
This, I knew in a blink, was blockbuster news. Judicial Watch had finally gotten its hands on what in bureaucratic language are called “302s” — summaries of FBI interviews. In this case the 302s were with Russia Hoax Justice Department official Bruce Ohr — he both the Obama-era Associate Deputy Attorney General (who inexplicably is still in some now-demoted post at Justice) and the husband of Nellie Ohr.
Mrs. Ohr, it had earlier been discovered, was an employee of the shady Fusion GPS firm that played a key role in the creation and financing of the infamous “Steele dossier” — a decided work of fiction that falsely attributed all kinds of imagined sins and nefarious deeds to Donald Trump and his supposed dalliance with Russians. And was then used to obtain FISA warrants — a decided case of using a fraudulent document to open an FBI investigation targeting the Trump campaign.
It was quickly apparent that my segment was going to be gone with the wind and, sure enough, it was cancelled. No problem with me. I have been intently following what has evolved over the last two-plus years into what effectively amounted to a soft-coup attempt by Deep State bureaucrats.
As often happens in the world of cable news, what only hours earlier was Topic A — the whole El Paso/Dayton tragedy in this case — had quickly been replaced by Topic Z, another topic entirely that was thrust into the spotlight because of new revelations.
There, all of a sudden, was Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton, whose constant legal badgering for once confidential government documents through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests had finally unearthed this treasure trove of new information.
Click link above to read more.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
So I followed you link and the only political results I got had in some way to do with Twitter. I think the fact that you spelled his name wrong was largely responsible for the poor search results tbh.
JazzyFresh
Banned
Explain to me what any of that had to do with Richard Matthews twitter though? As I said I really don't care but that's my entire point. What does Trump have to do with Richard even if I did misspell? Nothing...
Last edited:
Please do my a favor?
Don’t ever compare Hannity to “media” again. Guy is horribly biased. He’s the Maddow of the right.
Any use of him on any subject ***** way to many doors. Dudes a hack.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
Well nothing, it couldn't find any relevant news results for news having to do with "Richard Matthews" so most of the results were articles having to do with your third search term "twitter." I did notice an article written by someone with the last name Matthews which is probably why that came up. Keep in mind Google results are going to show things that are popular and "trending" when you search things.
I don't think it's a conspiracy at all, that's just how search engines work.
You want to limit their business and control them more?
Google prioritizes based on what is trending or getting clicks. If more people are clicking this sites they will be more likely to be shown.
But it's pretty well established CNN is crap news but no where near as crappy and dishonest as fox news. Why someone would waste their time with either is beyond me. But you post nothing but crap sources so I assume you waste all your time with bad sources.
idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
You want Google to place a conservative bias into their algo so less popular, conservative articles return in search results above more popular ones?
idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
If those two were in cages waiting for their turn to fight a bear in a pit, who would you choose to go first?
I could see your friend getting involved in a small group who wants to promote the things they believe in.
But somehow you've turned it into some kind of sinister propaganda troll farm.
People don't have to be in the pocket of the national DNC or RNC to regurgitate the information (propaganda) they willingly consume on a daily basis.
I'd let them double team the bear. Watch them refuse to work together for their own survival as they both get mauled.
Can you present these arguments without the stupidity of these videos?
I bet they'd fall kind of flat without the "well duh" sarcastic factor.