ABC news covered for Jeffrey Epstein

[One Brow]

Stupid absurd comment.

Based on your posting, I saw no reason to think of the comment as stupid nor absurd.

 

[One Brow]

Waiting for the Thriller to come in and vomit all over this topic with his "but Trump!!!" nonsense.

Waiting for a reason The Thriller would care.

 

[One Brow]

On the topic at hand and the fake news. Imagine a woman that came out of hiding, they have pictures and everything her giving it to ABC and them hiding it.

Where is this Kavanaugh type outrage?

When did Epstein get nominated for a SCOTUS seat? Last I heard, he was dead (and good riddance). You'd be hearing plenty of outrage if Epstein were in the government.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Based on your posting, I saw no reason to think of the comment as stupid nor absurd.

K, where have I ever been for child rape or rape in general. That's a pretty ****ed up thing to say but I'll wait for any proof. That I'm ok with rape like you claim.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

When did Epstein get nominated for a SCOTUS seat? Last I heard, he was dead (and good riddance). You'd be hearing plenty of outrage if Epstein were in the government.

It is amazing that you are so blind to the incredible hypocrisy of your logic.

 

[One Brow]

K, where have I ever been for child rape or rape in general. That's a pretty ****ed up thing to say but I'll wait for any proof. That I'm ok with rape like you claim.

I don't recall claiming you were OK with rape, only that I had not seen "a commitment to punishing men who are serial sexual abusers and rapists ..., regardless of their party or wealth." Glad to see you on board with that, I hope it lasts.

 

[One Brow]

It is amazing that you are so blind to the incredible hypocrisy of your logic.

You think it's hypocritical to say that preventing living sexual abusers from attaining power is more important than worrying about the dead ones? I await your outrage at the rape of slaves by Thomas Jefferson.

 

[Hotdog]

He's waiting for a Twitter to explain him what his view on this is

And this post pretty much sums up every argument from every liberal on this board.

 

[Hotdog]

You cant do both? I'm not trying to be rude here but thinking like this allows some prominent people within our ranks to stay masked or so I and many others agree. This is a child rape ring were talking about. How much worse can it get than that? You're ok with sexual predators roaming free? I know you're not buy your making it seem like this isn't a big deal.

He's more worried about Trump's mannerisms. Who cares about the kids

Isnt that right @Red ?

 

[Hotdog]

Powerful media corporation covers for powerful man, business as usual.



That's an unusual response to a post thanking you for joining the crusade against serial sexual abuse. It's almost like you're trolling.



Who's talking about the left-wing news? You're talking about ABC, a centrist, corporatist media platform.

Why would ABC try to cover for Epstein right when Hillary is running for president? Could it be that negative news about Bill Clinton could hurt her chances? That's exactly what it is. Hillary and Bill arent real progressives or Democrats. Anyone with a brain can see that. Anyone with a phone and a YouTube app can plainly see they just say what you want to hear.

We sorta argree that ABC isnt left leaning and they are centrist. Because they arent actually anything. Its all about money and power. They dont give a flying **** about your progressive politics. But they sure will placate to you and your ilk, just to win the battle to protect the establishment. THEY USE YOU as a political weapon. They know exactly how to push your buttons. Trump isnt about their plan so they want to take him out. They dont care about his morals. They have worse morals than him.

Im going to continue calling these fraudulent news organizations leftists as long as they are pretending to be leftists and attack the president because the people enabling them are leftists. That means you.

I cant believe you and so many people let these scum bags play you for fools. Do you really want to look back on your life in 20 years and realize you wasted so much time supporting scum? Thats where you are headed.

 

[Hotdog]

You think it's hypocritical to say that preventing living sexual abusers from attaining power is more important than worrying about the dead ones? I await your outrage at the rape of slaves by Thomas Jefferson.

Funny, you dont really believe that the problem is done now that Epstein is dead do you? You do dont you? No...you dont care. You are just trying to win an argument. Ya, thats it.

 

[Hotdog]

When did Epstein get nominated for a SCOTUS seat? Last I heard, he was dead (and good riddance). You'd be hearing plenty of outrage if Epstein were in the government.

Yep Epstein is dead. Nothing further to investigate.

Great logic bro.

How bad do you want to end the conversation about Epstein? You seem super desperate to get this swept under the rug.

 

[Archie Moses]

I'm just not sure of the point of this thread or arguing. Like, posters on here have some strong political takes and some of them irk me, but I don't think anyone of them support child molesters. News agencies didn't report on Epstein before this broke so nationally because they didn't think they'd make money - not because of some conspiracy or to brush things under the rug or because they condone child molestation.

Epstein was bad. It's not a left or a right thing unless you really try and spin it that way.

 

[fishonjazz]

I'm just not sure of the point of this thread or arguing. Like, posters on here have some strong political takes and some of them irk me, but I don't think anyone of them support child molesters. News agencies didn't report on Epstein before this broke so nationally because they didn't think they'd make money - not because of some conspiracy or to brush things under the rug or because they condone child molestation.

Epstein was bad. It's not a left or a right thing unless you really try and spin it that way.

I can't believe people took the bait. I saw the thread, saw the OP and figured no one would respond. Smd

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Hotdog]

I'm just not sure of the point of this thread or arguing. Like, posters on here have some strong political takes and some of them irk me, but I don't think anyone of them support child molesters. News agencies didn't report on Epstein before this broke so nationally because they didn't think they'd make money - not because of some conspiracy or to brush things under the rug or because they condone child molestation.

Epstein was bad. It's not a left or a right thing unless you really try and spin it that way.

I know you are just trying to throw them a bone, but this isnt the time.

Did you look closely at the story? You really buy that the ABC executives had no idea who Jeffrey Epstein was 3 years ago?

They werent going to make money? Thats the concern? Really? Then that's a story too. They only care if it makes them money.

Or is this anti conspiracy thinking? Because I cannot understand how someone can try to say is crazy to believe high level ABC executives would squash this story for reasons that would have negative impact on their favored political candidates. If you were told Epstein had a special island for raping young women you wouldnt have believed it just a few years ago. But yet that still happened. Its mind boggling that people so easily dismiss conspiracy theories, when real conspiracies happen all the time. The people who dont want you to find out about their conspiracies love people who fight to keep their secrets secret.

This should be a bipartisan issue, but its clearly not. Only one side wants to talk about it. Yoi cant tell me its not an important story. Or is talking about Trump 24/7 really that more important?

 

[One Brow]

Why would ABC try to cover for Epstein right when Hillary is running for president?

To continue the pattern of covering for Epstein that had been going on for decades. Why would ABC stop covering for Epstein at that point?

Could it be that negative news about Bill Clinton could hurt her chances?

Your naivete is cute.

That's exactly what it is. Hillary and Bill arent real progressives or Democrats. Anyone with a brain can see that. Anyone with a phone and a YouTube app can plainly see they just say what you want to hear.

We sorta argree that ABC isnt left leaning and they are centrist. Because they arent actually anything. Its all about money and power. They dont give a flying **** about your progressive politics. But they sure will placate to you and your ilk, just to win the battle to protect the establishment. THEY USE YOU as a political weapon. They know exactly how to push your buttons. Trump isnt about their plan so they want to take him out. They dont care about his morals. They have worse morals than him.

I agree with all of that, and would only add that they also use you, and pretty much anyone else they can get to watch their shows.

Im going to continue calling these fraudulent news organizations leftists as long as they are pretending to be leftists and attack the president because the people enabling them are leftists. That means you.

So, you are going to continue their lies in order to try and embarrass me? OK.

I cant believe you and so many people let these scum bags play you for fools. Do you really want to look back on your life in 20 years and realize you wasted so much time supporting scum? Thats where you are headed.

How is ABC playing me for a fool again?

 

[One Brow]

Funny, you dont really believe that the problem is done now that Epstein is dead do you? You do dont you? No...you dont care. You are just trying to win an argument. Ya, thats it.

Do you mean the problem of Epstein raping girls? Yeah, that's done. Do you mean the problem of the media protecting the wealthy? As long as the media are owned by the wealthy, they will protect the wealthy.

 

[One Brow]

Because I cannot understand how someone can try to say is crazy to believe high level ABC executives would squash this story for reasons that would have negative impact on their favored political candidates.

So, that's your confusion. I have a surprise for you: ABC likes all the mainstream political candidates. The liked Clinton and Trump, they like McConnell and Schiff. All of these candidates are in the PWPBP, and they are all good for ABCs bottom line. ABC covers up for all the wealthy, both liberal and conservative.

 

[Hotdog]

So, that's your confusion. I have a surprise for you: ABC likes all the mainstream political candidates. The liked Clinton and Trump, they like McConnell and Schiff. All of these candidates are in the PWPBP, and they are all good for ABCs bottom line. ABC covers up for all the wealthy, both liberal and conservative.

Ok, then we agree that it isnt real journalism. That's been the biggest point Ive been pushing when it comes to politics. Its, Fake, News. As soon as you start playing sides and framing things a certain way then it's propaganda.

Im glad one of you finally had the balls to admit it instead of playing these dumb games.

 

[Hotdog]

Do you mean the problem of Epstein raping girls? Yeah, that's done. Do you mean the problem of the media protecting the wealthy? As long as the media are owned by the wealthy, they will protect the wealthy.

To continue the pattern of covering for Epstein that had been going on for decades. Why would ABC stop covering for Epstein at that point?



Your naivete is cute.



I agree with all of that, and would only add that they also use you, and pretty much anyone else they can get to watch their shows.



So, you are going to continue their lies in order to try and embarrass me? OK.



How is ABC playing me for a fool again?

See my last post for all of this. We can stop arguing now. We agree MSM is propaganda.

Thats all I've wanted to accomplish

Thank you.