Why didn't you veto the Malone (35), 72 trade for 39, 58? Trading up 4 spots for 14 spots back from the 50's to 70's is a big difference in this game. Oh, it's because Malone should have went higher. Why should you veto a trade that both teams want?
All-Time NBA Draft (not just international)
- Thread starter QuinSnydersHair
- Start date
Why didn't you veto the Malone (35), 72 trade for 39, 58? Trading up 4 spots for 14 spots back from the 50's to 70's is a big difference in this game. Oh, it's because Malone should have went higher. Why should you veto a trade that both teams want?
A 10 pick move in the 3-4 round isn't the same as 10 pick move in 6-7 rounds, you know that, I know that.
I'm just saying you should be able to get more from Spy. It's just my opinion.
Spy bro - give White Choc a bit more and I'll approve it. C'mon bro you know it's a lopsided deal.
spycam1
Well-Known Member
Cause he #hateshisneighbors
I'm all about fairness.
Even if you say Worthy went later than he should, how can you compare 15 spots between 3-4 rounds, and 10 spots between 6-7 rounds?
Coach Ellis
Well-Known Member
I'll approve the trade. I was interested in both Worthy and Drexler in some sort of package for my 58 pick, but on the surface I think the trade looks even enough if they're happy with it.
Nice to see people continuing the culture of destroying the dissenter.
Err... I mean, **** Hotttnickkk.
Hotttnickkk is the guy that wants to win so bad that he'll veto every trade. He's threatened by people who improve their teams through trades. This is much like the dictator who actively deters his constituents from banding together, fearing that they might tell him how lame he is and publicly execute him.
Err... I mean, **** Hotttnickkk.
Hotttnickkk is the guy that wants to win so bad that he'll veto every trade. He's threatened by people who improve their teams through trades. This is much like the dictator who actively deters his constituents from banding together, fearing that they might tell him how lame he is and publicly execute him.
JoelHodgeJr
Well-Known Member
Picks need to speed up today.
That's really unfair. The point of the veto system is such that if an unfair/lopsided trade comes up then at least we get a say in it. Otherwise what's the point of having it?
To me a 15 pick improvement in round 3-4 is not the same as a 10 pick improvement in round 6-7, so I believe I'm well within my rights to have a say in it.
W/e bro, just keep paying that secret police
There is more talent at the top than there is at the bottom.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Kinda funny
i thought spy was the one getting the bad end of the deal.
I loved spys team and prefer worthy to drexler
People are quick to talk about how good Drexler is, yet Spy is the only one who made me an offer.
Absolutely that's why I think you should have gotten a bit more at the bottom!!!
You're giving up 15 spots at the top, but only getting back 10 spots at the bottom!!!
Though I think it is a very even deal since Spy had two small forwards in Pierce/Worthy and needed a shooting guard, this is how you have to look at it. From a talent standpoint, not where they were picked. Once again, don't reward me for taking Drexler a little too high.
Moving up 10 spots in the 60-70 range is more valuable than moving up 15 spots in the 25-35 range, imo.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
I approve the trade. Looks fair to me
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Correct me if wrong, but I think I'm the only one thats made a pick today. Lol
If I had offered you a trade for #35 & #60 for #25 & #70, you wouldn't have even taken a look at it.
