The Jazz have needed to address this, within the context of "contention" or the pretense that comes with it, since at least 2006/07.
And...they've done nothing.
Which is pretty typical on all fronts, even now. That is, when we consider improvement positionally and overall, rather than stopgaps or matches.
The Jazz did a really nice job salvaging with Jefferson in place of Boozer, but what this does as far as marked improvement is an open question. The idea of a player that likes setting up deep in the post is exciting, but this relative lack hasn't been killing the Jazz as much as lame complementary backcourt pieces on skillset bases and paint protection.
The closest the Jazz came to addressing either of those years' long holes came in the form of Hayward. That they know this is a problem and have finally done something is nice, until you factor how little has been done over how long a period of time.
Jazz fans now believe that this team is close to contention, based on a couple moves that stopped them from slipping out of the playoffs.
Inter alia (in the context of double-edges), the Jazz have been "close" for awhile now. And the FO has done nothing to get them much closer, or "there".
What makes this offseason much different? I have hope for Jefferson and Hayward, but I don't see how the Jazz have done that much to improve the roster or change dynamics in a positive or dominant position over prior Williams' Jazz teams.
Could be better. Could be about the same. Could be worse.
But key issues are still unaddressed. People thinking Jefferson>>>Boozer is certainly arguable, and I hope it plays out, but the Jazz need far better pieces as far as offensive facilitation payoff and out, as well as someone to bother shots in the paint.
What else is new?