What's new
By:

As the trade deadline inches closer...

Rubio to Phoenix for Monroe

Favors, Burks and a 2nd (maybe add future 2nds) to Atlanta for expirings

JoeJ and Hood to Cavs for Osman, expirings and the Cleveland 2018 1st

Highly, highly unlikely, but clearing all that off is a clean slate.

Burks, Hood, Favors, Rubio, JoeJ and a 2nd gone
for
Expirings, Osman and a late first.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
oneye said:
Sounds great if only it was that easy.
Click to expand...

It is what DL is paid to do. Also from rumors, the best info we have at our disposal, is that several of these players have significant interest. If you know you are going to let them walk at the end of the season you take the best deal offered. And it seems, again rumors, that discussions are happening at the least.

No, I don't think all of them are traded but I bet a couple of them are.
 
I've been trying to say that deals are probably less likely to happen than they appear (at least the plethora of them). People diving in head first because Tony Jones or someone else says something and everyone thinks it's obvious we're making a move with our guys. I think we'll be singing a different tune after the deadline, rationalizing and saying things like "it's just so hard to move guys during the season in today's NBA" and other feel-good statements.

We may have one move, and I'm hoping like hell it's Mirotic, but I again wouldn't be surprised by a move out of left field of Jerebko for a second round pick.
 
tedbundy said:
Agree with utahJazz32.. we do nothing.
Click to expand...

If we do nothing and then re-sign these same players or let them walk for nothing it is failure by DL. Even trading Favors for a 2nd rounder is better than that. If the FO knows they are moving on then you have to get something for them.
 
I’m very much in favor of some sort of move. I want to at least see something by this deadline, it’s just not that easy. Most the league right now is a mess, so much is happening and so many teams want to make moves, I hope we get in on some. The Jazz have some issues, one of the biggest being Rubio. George Hill was an obivous reason why we won and lost quite a few games last year. We win when Rubio has a good night or at least compete. When Rubio has one of his bad nights (more often than not) we look like the bottom 5 teams in the league. I just don’t know how important Ricky is to Donovan right now. It sure seems like Donovan likes Ricky, gets support from Ricky, and learns from Ricky. So even though Ricky kills us at times is he too important to our guy who is basically the face of the franchise now compared to what we would get back which isn’t much for Ricky? I don’t know some type of move needs to be done and every move should ensure it is a move made to benefit Donovan and Rudy long term not just a short term bandaid on this season and next which probably won’t mean much. Tough world in the NBA right now, which is actually a benefit to the Jazz and DL and hopefully they can capatlize.
 
First of all we need to be patient and think about long-term.

I think Favors is unhappy and does not fit so him leaving and a stretch-4 starting would help everyone and mostly Gobert and Mitchell, so that's the only move we have to make short-term.

You can also feel there is a lot of tension around the team. Snyder's interviews are unusual. Something is going on, probably both in locker room and between FO - coaching staff. But we have no real media to report anything. DL should do something asap. I'd say just send Favors away, everyone knows he's leaving the Jazz this offseason anyway.

On the other hand signing some players mentioned around may tie our hands going forward. It's a stars league, we have two stars and one is on a rookie deal. We play terrible now but we have a bright future. We need to acquire a 3rd star, a strong offensive player ala Jabari Parker. That should be the main goal that everything should shape around. Other than that I'd be hesitant to pull the trigger unless an opportunity presents itself, e.g. an underrated/undervalued guy like Fournier who wants to play for the Jazz and is able to score 20 ppg becomes available. We'd not mind his contract, again we have a star on a rookie contract which helps tremendously financially. Mitchell - Fournier - Gobert + add a star either via draft/FA/trade, and we compete. I don't care about good players, sand how many of them we have.. depth means RS success only so everyone good is expendable.
 
Last edited:
Stoked said:
If we do nothing and then re-sign these same players or let them walk for nothing it is failure by DL. Even trading Favors for a 2nd rounder is better than that. If the FO knows they are moving on then you have to get something for them.
Click to expand...

That would be a failure move by DL.
 
Normally the Jazz are EXTREMELY tight lipped when it comes to trades and who they are actually trying to get. I was surprised when Dennis Lindsay advocated getting a 6'10 guy that can shoot the three ball well. I immediately thought of Niko, but I think his price is getting high. I think the Jazz are going to grab someone that we do not expect, but is silently on the block because it is unlikely he will be retained for money purposes (think of our version of Hood on another team)... someone like Noah Vonleh - someone the Jazz gamble on a bit, but could possible develop into a stretchy four.

Note: I am not advocating for this trade, per se. I am simply stating that I am normally surprised by Jazz moves. The organization hardly leaks or telegraphs what they are doing. I plan on being surprised.
 
I know it is very hard to make a trade. Much harder than I make it out to be. At the end of the day, these 3 guys are completely out of favor and are not long term options at our dear club.

Favors - for all the reasons we have been saying since Rudy emerged
JoeJ - our future is bright and we appreciate his service, but he doesn't stay unless he takes sweetheart vet deal like DWade at $1.4 million. I don't think we necessarily have to trade him, but sending him to a contender would be a nice thank you.
Burks - the guy only played last night because we were getting destroyed at Atlanta of all places. He is so far down the pecking order. If he was part of a "post-Hood" plan, he would have played more and featured the last couple games.

Others potentially out...

Rubio - I would like to trade him, but I'm not upset if we don't.
Hood - I'm okay trading him if the FO or Quin knows something we don't. The return needs to be a first.

Thabo - I don't want to trade him, but I completely understand if we have to since his $5 million expiring might be needed.

Ending analysis - Favors must be dealt for any future value. Burks can be dealt if there are any takers.
 
Trade Favs/Hood to Cavs and take on one of their garbage contracts, for Cavs top-6 protected Nets pick. Good chance of landing Jaren Jackson
 
I don’t like the idea of trading guys just to get rid of them. What’s the point of trading expiring contracts for expiring contracts? That’s just moving pieces around a game board without any plan for how to win.

I’d rather see the organization pivot to reboot around Rudy Gobert. For me, that means chasing a starting 4 and a new wing to team up with Gobert/Mitchell, while figuring out how to move on from the 4 guys that fit the least - Favors, Burks, Rubio & JJ - and (hopefully) get some value out of their contracts in the process.
 
WhiskyPriest said:
For those that don't want to click the link... Jalen Rose is the source.
Click to expand...

Much like us with Gordon, San Antonio has to trade Kawhi before risking losing him for nothing. However, I think San Antonio would have to crash out of the playoffs in pretty ugly fashion for them to consider trading Kawhi.
 
oneye said:
Sounds great if only it was that easy.
Click to expand...
Yep. DL needs assets to work deals next summer and two current assets will be gone by then, so trading them for serviceable players now will give him something of value for future deals, even if they don't help the team.

If Favors and Hood are still here on February 9th, it is because DL couldn't find a trade partner that gave him anything more valuable than the cap space he gains for letting them walk -- which is a pretty low bar.
 
LoPo said:
Much like us with Gordon, San Antonio has to trade Kawhi before risking losing him for nothing. However, I think San Antonio would have to crash out of the playoffs in pretty ugly fashion for them to consider trading Kawhi.
Click to expand...
I think they’d just unload all their old guys and reboot before trading him - assuming he’s healthy and not dealing with major issues.
 
LoPo said:
Much like us with Gordon, San Antonio has to trade Kawhi before risking losing him for nothing. However, I think San Antonio would have to crash out of the playoffs in pretty ugly fashion for them to consider trading Kawhi.
Click to expand...

They can extend him this offseason... if he doesn't take the extension then you look to move him if you feel you have too. I think this report is... really speculative.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top