What's new
By:

Bin Laden is dead

DutchJazzer said:
nice counter argument.

i think you misunderstand me. i'm not sticking up for bin laden. but hey if you think i am okay.
Click to expand...

A little 2 year old girl was on the second plane that hit the towers. Bin Ladens lucky he got two shots to the head. I agree we should have kept him alive for a more painful death.
 
Beantown said:
A little 2 year old girl was on the second plane that hit the towers. Bin Ladens lucky he got two shots to the head. I agree we should have kept him alive for a more painful death.
Click to expand...


so due proces goes out of the window because some 2 year old. nice going america freedom, democracy, due process, innocent until proven guilty, goes out the window cus of some 2 year old girl( all due respect to the people who died in the attacks.)
 
DutchJazzer said:
they could have kept in on a submarine orAircraft carrier. in an undisclosed location broadcast the trial from there if they are concerned about security. so yes a logistical nightmare. but imho the right thing to do.

i know if it was broadcast that osama is at building x doing the trial some drugged out redneck will try to assassinate him. or whatever. or some terrorist cell will try to free him. but still the right thing to do is hold a trial. didnt osama (supposedly) commit(Or is the mastermindbehind) a crime on us soil. what happened to innocent until proven guilty. doenst he deserve a (fair) trial. isnt that what america stands for?

or because he isn't a us citizen he does not deserve a fair and speedy trial. what kind of legal precedent does this set. what if a foreign guy kills 30 people instead of 3000 will he get shot and burried at sea too.

what they did is outright MURDER. they even disposed of the evidence.
was osama armed did osama fight back if so he deserves to get shot.
you always should try to catch a criminal alive and unharmed if it does not interfere with other peoples safety/live. did they try that or did they just catch him shot him in the back of the head and dumped him at sea?

the way it should have gone try to catch him alive. give him a faur and speedy trial(i know a logistic nightmare but not impossible) then if guilty shoot him hang him electrocute him whatever. cremate his behind and dump it at sea or send it to space or whatever.

isnt that what America stands for?

they spend miollions of dollars on the so called war on terror. yet they dont have the money to keep osama at sea for a trial laywer etc? is america really that bankcrupt?


hope you guys understand where i'm comming from.
Click to expand...

I just think this is great. Probably top 5 new-era Jazzfanz post.

Highlights:

"Outright murder!"
"Legal precedent"
"Is America too bankrupt to hire a lawyer for Osama Bin Laden or what?"
 
DutchJazzer said:
pics or it didnt happen
Click to expand...

Wow you are really siding with bin laden over the us government on this? Damn bro you are worse then I thought. Save some virgins for the other guys.

Im going to bed but if you start a fund to move your bin laden loving self to Pakistan I'll be the first to donate. The fact that you are stressing out about how US marines treated Osama friggin Bin Laden is disgusting. 20 bucks says you are more worried about bin laden then 9/11.
 
lance you told me while nger repping me bin laden on trail is just sutpid.

so who deserves a trial if someone kills 10 people he gets a trial if someone gets 20 he gets a trail. if someone kills 3000 he does not get/deserve a trail.

so whats the number magic number for getting a trail. or is it because osama isnt a us citizen?
 
DutchJazzer said:
lance you told me while nger repping me bin laden on trail is just sutpid.

so who deserves a trial if someone kills 10 people he gets a trial if someone gets 20 he gets a trail. if someone kills 3000 he does not get/deserve a trail.

so whats the number magic number for getting a trail. or is it because osama isnt a us citizen?
Click to expand...

You ask is it because Osama isn't a US citizen. Short answer? No. Long answer? Hell no.

Why would you even think that has anything to do with it? Why would you even think of this as a normal situation?

If you're in a war and you have a chance to take out the enemy general you do it with no hesitation.
 
We're not talking about a criminal, we're talking about a terrorist warrior who has attacked innocent civilians several times. He wasn't being raided by the police. Unfortunately for Osama, he was being raided by Navy SEALs. They might not be very good at taking people alive...because that's not really their job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top