What's new
By:

Black Kid Shot in Gated Neighboorhood

Hayward Supremacist said:
A user at 4chan under the handle "Klanklannon" hacked into the little thug's facebook only to find out that he was a drug dealer who skipped class to sell drugs (you can google it yourself, the libs will surely report me for posting Facebook images where the thug used the n word). Codeine was specifically mentioned, so you liberals can't say "it's only weed." Now just imagine if the media's headlines were this "boy who smoked weed and sold codeine shot after attacking community watchman," instead of, "boy with Skittles and iced tea killed for being black."

Divide and conquer, I suppose.
Click to expand...

Is this an April fool's joke? I'm sure a Klan follower would have no interest in making this up.
 
JimLes said:
He might not have killed him because he was black, but he certainly was suspicious of him and decided to confront him because he's black.
Click to expand...


Because anytime a black person gets negative attention for anything it is the result of racism?

I keep my eye on teenage boys and expect them to be punks most of the time. Race has nothing to do with it. But I'm sure the one time I'm paying attention to a black kid it'll be because I'm racist.
 
JimLes said:
Oh gee, white people getting all up in arms because someone is questioning their post racial fantasies, and the evil board is preventing them from participating in the repping circle jerk.
Click to expand...

Huh, didn't stop me from negging your ***.
 
stereotypes.jpg
 
SaltyDawg said:
I'm not googling it, lol. Certain things don't belong in my search history. The Klan's latest blog is one of them.
Click to expand...

I did google it and I'll be the first to say that I'm very skeptical about the validity of the information as he offers no actual proof of what he claims to have found and seen.

That being said, Salty, if it does turn out to be true does it lessen the impact simply because a KKK member was the one that brought it to light?
 
Scat said:
I did google it and I'll be the first to say that I'm very skeptical about the validity of the information as he offers no actual proof of what he claims to have found and seen.

That being said, Salty, if it does turn out to be true does it lessen the impact simply because a KKK member was the one that brought it to light?
Click to expand...

A KKK member who hacked into some black kid's Facebook is not a credible witness as to what was in the Facebook account before he tempered with it.
 
SaltyDawg said:
A KKK member who hacked into some black kid's Facebook is not a credible witness as to what was in the Facebook account before he tempered* with it.
Click to expand...

*Tampered

So you automatically assume that just because he hacked it he tampered with it? Does that not make you just as bad as that you claim to abhor?
 
Hayward Supremacist said:
A user at 4chan under the handle "Klanklannon" hacked into the little thug's facebook only to find out that he was a drug dealer who skipped class to sell drugs (you can google it yourself, the libs will surely report me for posting Facebook images where the thug used the n word). Codeine was specifically mentioned, so you liberals can't say "it's only weed." Now just imagine if the media's headlines were this "boy who smoked weed and sold codeine shot after attacking community watchman," instead of, "boy with Skittles and iced tea killed for being black."

Divide and conquer, I suppose.
Click to expand...

Codeine? Wow, that changes everything as Viocdin dealers are like hardcore.
 
Scat said:
*Tampered

So you automatically assume that just because he hacked it he tampered with it? Does that not make you just as bad as that you claim to abhor?
Click to expand...

For some bizarre reason in this country evidence that is found by breaking into to someone's place is considered inadmissible. Sure, it could be it's just inadmissible because an illegal act was used to get the information in the first place, but I'd wager another reason is because it would be ridiculously easy to mess with the "evidence" if one did so. It's not much of a stretch to think someone who would break into a place would plant evidence at the same time.
 
Now Spike Lee is retweeting a fake Zimmerman address and has put an elderly couple in danger. Right or wrong, that's pretty close to crossing the line IMO. He should be arrested now and we'll worry about what to try him for, if anything, later on.

Now where the hell is Obama tellling us this elderly couple would look like his grandparents if he had any?
 
franklin said:
Now Spike Lee is retweeting a fake Zimmerman address and has put an elderly couple in danger. Right or wrong, that's pretty close to crossing the line IMO. He should be arrested now and we'll worry about what to try him for, if anything, later on.

Now where the hell is Obama tellling us this elderly couple would look like his grandparents if he had any?
Click to expand...

It is a dick move by Lee but not anything illegal. Now I wonder what legal reprecusions he would have if someone used his tweet of the address to commit a crime against the elderly couple.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top