What's new

Black Kid Shot in Gated Neighboorhood

you don't know how is nose was broken, if it was broken, or when it was broken.
ditto the head.
he didn't look badly hurt to me, and if he was, that does not prove the dead kid did it, or that he didn't deserve it anyway.

Very true. The catch is that the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman murdered him and did not act out of self defense. To me it is reasonable to assume that Zimmerman acted out of self defense given the extent and location of his injuries. You can say that ZImmerman did them to himslef or whatever. You may even be right. But it is not beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
No doubt all the pasty-skinned folk who, deep underneath, are scared of the those with darker skin were able to empathize with Zimmerman so much that they overlooked the incriminationg points of that article, and think it acts as some sort of justification. It doesn't.

Forgive me while I laugh out loud. Wait... you're not black are you? If you are, then I'm totally kidding about the whole "laughing out loud" thing. Please don't shoot me.

The justification was established once his nose was broken and head bashed against the pavement.

Facts, facts, facts. Don't you ever get tired of being right? (I never do, but I imagine at some point it gets old for some people)

Very true. The catch is that the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman murdered him and did not act out of self defense. To me it is reasonable to assume that Zimmerman acted out of self defense given the extent and location of his injuries. You can say that ZImmerman did them to himslef or whatever. You may even be right. But it is not beyond a reasonable doubt.

Save your fingers and brain cells. Typing out an actual thought that has reason and a factual base is a waste of your time. Look at who you're responding to, FFS.
 
The justification was established once his nose was broken and head bashed against the pavement.

Zimmerman brought the gun to the fight before the fight. He lied about what he was doing. He tracked down a kid that was already terrified. Zimmerman created the danger and the fear by his own actions. long before the fight started.
 
Forgive me while I laugh out loud.

I have no expectation of you taking that seriously.

Please don't shoot me.

A black man is much more likely to be shot by a white man than to shoot one. But thanks for the joke. It was really funny, and not at all insensitive or racist. You really are one of the good ones.

Don't you ever get tired of being right?

If it happened more often, he might. I challenge you to come up with one time Scat complained that a prosecutor was speaking too aggressively about a black defendant.
 
I'll leave that to the jury. They will see more reliable evidence, and less unreliable evidence, than we will ever know about.

For the most part its all fairly public, I don't think there is a whole lot of secret stuff that they are withholding from everyone. I think everyone agrees Zimmerman made some bad choices that if they had been different this whole thing never would have happened. Trayvon also made some bad choices that if he hadn't this wouldn't have happened. I just find it borderline impossible for a jury to convict Zimmerman of 2nd degree murder, maybe manslaughter but not 2nd degree. They evidence shows there was a fight and Zimmerman was hit and he fired and killed trayvon, sounds like self defense to me. Probably shouldn't have shot him, but he also shouldn't have had his face punched.
 
For the most part its all fairly public, I don't think there is a whole lot of secret stuff that they are withholding from everyone. I think everyone agrees Zimmerman made some bad choices that if they had been different this whole thing never would have happened. Trayvon also made some bad choices that if he hadn't this wouldn't have happened. I just find it borderline impossible for a jury to convict Zimmerman of 2nd degree murder, maybe manslaughter but not 2nd degree. They evidence shows there was a fight and Zimmerman was hit and he fired and killed trayvon, sounds like self defense to me. Probably shouldn't have shot him, but he also shouldn't have had his face punched.

Everyone needs a good face-punching every now and then. I can think of a few posters on this board.......
 
If it happened more often, he might. I challenge you to come up with one time Scat complained that a prosecutor was speaking too aggressively about a black defendant.

What does my complaining about an overzealous prosecutor, regardless of the accused's race, have anything to do with my being right on a frequent basis?
 
For the most part its all fairly public, I don't think there is a whole lot of secret stuff that they are withholding from everyone. I think everyone agrees Zimmerman made some bad choices that if they had been different this whole thing never would have happened. Trayvon also made some bad choices that if he hadn't this wouldn't have happened. I just find it borderline impossible for a jury to convict Zimmerman of 2nd degree murder, maybe manslaughter but not 2nd degree. They evidence shows there was a fight and Zimmerman was hit and he fired and killed trayvon, sounds like self defense to me. Probably shouldn't have shot him, but he also shouldn't have had his face punched.

Pretty much how I feel, and I'll admit I was wrong a few times here as well. Except I place most of the blame at Zimmerman for not minding his own business and getting this ball rolling in the first place.

That being said, there are two things I find curious about this. One is who started the fight. All we have is Zimmerman's word and it could be right, though I still just doubt he was just minding his own business and got sucker punched. The problem I do find is that when you're the only one who can tell the story and know what happened, you can make the situation appear in your favor. But maybe it did happen as he said. The second is at what point can you start a fight, back off from it (say it was him screaming in that 911 call) and then shoot someone and claim self defense?
 
I can certainly imagine a scenario consistent with the known facts in which Trey thought he was the one defending himself in his actions, even assuming he was punching Zimm, and even that Zimm knew he was provoking a confrontation. It does not seem that the police were appropriately aggressive in their approach.
 
I can certainly imagine a scenario consistent with the known facts in which Trey thought he was the one defending himself in his actions, even assuming he was punching Zimm, and even that Zimm knew he was provoking a confrontation. It does not seem that the police were appropriately aggressive in their approach.

Haven't read this thread, but this is my gut instinct as well.
 
I originally started defending Zimmerman based on people saying it was a hate crime, I didn't think it was a hate crime, it may have been a crime, but I doubt it was a hate crime. It seems everyone has moved on past the whole hate crime thing and are now arguing whether it was simply a crime. It is not illegal to follow someone through a neighborhood, it is not illegal to defend yourself from a threat (both trayvon and zimmerman both felt threatened I'm sure), it's not illegal to use deadly force if you feel your life is at risk. So now I'm still leaning towards it being self defense, albeit Zimmerman probably jumped the gun (pun intended) on using deadly force, he can still claim self defense and be found innocent.
 
I have no expectation of you taking that seriously.
Wait, were you actually expecting a serious response to that idiotic drivel you posted? Seriously?

A black man is much more likely to be shot by a white man than to shoot one. But thanks for the joke. It was really funny, and not at all insensitive or racist. You really are one of the good ones.
There are few things in this life that make me giggle more than being called a racist. This is like saying Carrot Top is one of the greatest comedians of all time, or John Stockton was a terrible passer.

If it happened more often, he might. I challenge you to come up with one time Scat complained that a prosecutor was speaking too aggressively about a black defendant.

Well then, let me just get right on that. I'm sure that topic has come up many times on this board, so finding something comparable should be cake...

Seriously, TaintBrow, just WTF are you trying to prove here? Do I need to give you a call at your school office to discuss how you handle yourself on the innerwebz? I know people who know people; I will find you.
 
Back
Top