What's new

Blow the !@$%!%#$ Team Up

From the tea leaves and smoke out there, it sure sounds like we should expect Snyder and Mitchell back.

I am okay with the latter (Mitchell will still have trade value next year), but completely baffled by the former. Has any NBA coach withstood so many playoff disappointments?
It's a very fair point.

What I find most interesting is that simply from a coaching standpoint, Quin has really built it all around a screening/rim protecting big man. Even our 2nd rotation has had to have a big man that fits the description (Favors, Whiteside, Doke, etc).

If we trade the best screening/rim protecting big man in the league, why does our FO think that Quin can build a successful system without it? Where is the evidence that Quin can completely change his ways and build a modern day style contender?

It would completely unfair to sell out Rudy Gobert and leave all the other pieces intact. It's not his fault for many of our struggles.
 
Because....

He's very marketable

He's barely 25

He's exciting

He's a 3 time All Star

He's been to the playoffs all 5 years of his career

He's a good dude and respected by peers

He's almost impossible to replace via the draft or trades

He's our best player for modern day playoffs

Tear downs suck ***






Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Impossible to replace in the draft?

Jaden Ivey and Shadeon Sharpe are in this draft.
 
Not trying to discredit Mitchell too much, but a lot more guards could come in and be the #1 scoring option on the Jazz and do a really good job than you probably think.

We could sign Jalen Brunson and he would average an efficient 20 for us. Our team is a scoring guard's dream. He is very replaceable.

The allure of Mitchell has worn off quick now that we know the defense isnt improving and the playoff performances are more flukely than legit.
 
If we drafted Jaden Ivey this year, I think he would likely put up a season comparable to Donovan's rookie season.
 
If you trade one the smart move is to trade the other and rebuild. Cash in on the other pieces rather than pray you miraculously pull a rabbit out of the hat and find another star to pair with whatever guy is left. It’s likely the best time to do it and both guys would get a haul of future facing assets. We will be fine enduring it.
I honestly have no idea what either would get.

Gobert is great, but that contract is massive. I don't think you are getting a haul of assets. I think you can get an expiring contract the other team doesnt want, the center Gobert is going to replace, one decent young player or role player, and a non-lottery first. Maybe a team like Sacramento/New Orleans/Washington talk themselves into giving up their high lotto pick combined with w/ deadweight salary (with a decent player thrown in) for Gobert

Mitchell: I honestly have no idea. I think everyone in the league sees him as what he is now. I don't think he has the same shine to him he had last year when you could talk your self into him possibly becoming a top 10 player. He now has a reputation of being a terrible defender and someone who can have too much tunnel vision. But then again I may be overstating that. The biggest positive for him is that he's under contract for 3 more years at a fair price. The precedent for trading a guy like Mitchell with 3 years left just isnt there for me to even base anything off of.
 
Impossible to replace in the draft?

Jaden Ivey and Shadeon Sharpe are in this draft.
I think Sharpe is a huge upside guy... the profile, the way he moves, and the jumper look pretty amazing. Don't understand why he didn't play but if he had I wonder what the opinion would be of him. I'd need to know what type of kid he is but he might be a steal at 5-8.

I haven't done my own research there but both prospects seem pretty solid.
 
I'm bored at work:

Detroit also gets #15 from Charlotte and a 2027 protected 1st from the Lakers

We also get #13 from Charlotte and 2nds from the Lakers. Oh, and we save $10 million.
 

Attachments

  • 1651073236381.png
    1651073236381.png
    754 KB · Views: 19
I honestly have no idea what either would get.

Gobert is great, but that contract is massive. I don't think you are getting a haul of assets. I think you can get an expiring contract the other team doesnt want, the center Gobert is going to replace, one decent young player or role player, and a non-lottery first. Maybe a team like Sacramento/New Orleans/Washington talk themselves into giving up their high lotto pick combined with w/ deadweight salary (with a decent player thrown in) for Gobert

Mitchell: I honestly have no idea. I think everyone in the league sees him as what he is now. I don't think he has the same shine to him he had last year when you could talk your self into him possibly becoming a top 10 player. He now has a reputation of being a terrible defender and someone who can have too much tunnel vision. But then again I may be overstating that. The biggest positive for him is that he's under contract for 3 more years at a fair price. The precedent for trading a guy like Mitchell with 3 years left just isnt there for me to even base anything off of.
I think Rudy is an eye of the beholder guy. If Sacramento hadn't gone in on Sabonis he'd honestly be perfect for their goals because they'd love to get to the 40s in wins and just sneak into the playoffs. I think its Memphis, Dallas, Charlotte (though they have some cost issues), Atlanta, maybe NY or Toronto but the trade fit is hard to see with Toronto's salary. The return may be less than we think or someone may rise up that we haven't considered. The issue is if you give Dallas or Memphis Rudy it really sets them up for success and if we move toward mediocrity it looks really ******... Donovan gonna love that? So if you are looking to stay good it REALLY starts limiting what you can do.

Donovan I think you are selling his value short. I am not sure he'd have the trade value that Damian had last offseason but it would be close. I think Beal and Donovan would be awfully close in value. Recent struggles maybe take away a little shine but I think a pick in the 3-8 range plus another young prospect and some other goodies is totally reasonable. If its a team like the Knicks and the don't move up its a 10 dimes for a dollar package but the upside is getting picks for 2023 and beyond that are unprotected that would have big upside. If Donovan and RJ pairing isn't awesome then that package gets real nice... if you are patient. Its similar to the KG/Pierce Brooklyn deal. I actually think a Donovan trade could net more back but the prospects would have to hit.

Then you can also trade in Bogey/JC/Mike for future looking stuff that is good. Add in Royce to that group as well. Would LA do Westbrook and two unprotected picks in 27 and 29 for Mike and Bogey... add in Royce or JC too.

Then you pick up ancillary assets by taking in burdensome contracts or rehab projects. Basically the OKC model. Would Brooklyn do the Philly pick (it has protections that allow you to defer it to 2023 unprotected and has some upside) they have and Joe Harris for Bogey? You can rehab Joe and flip him later... if he can't get healthy the cap hit really doesn't matter.

It would be preferrable to land a top 7 pick this year so we have a prospect to start rooting for and watch develop. If the return on Rudy is **** then maybe you can do something with Donovan where you get an Ivey and another good player and change out some of the parts. I don't think the performance of the team is the issue... its the performance with expectations and also the general attitude and vibes around the team. I think Rudy would be cool living his days out in Utah even if it meant the team wins high 40s and only breaks out of the first round here and there. I don't love that model but if Ivey or one of the other assets really breaks out then you have a little higher ceiling.

Its ironic that the core and other pieces that Ainge built in Boston are now working. He had some misses for sure but the overall construction of building around wings and two way players is the right idea. He also watched IT and Kemba break down and Kyrie bail on the franchise... so I do not think Donovan is off the table.

If you did a tandem deal with Dallas and NY you could actually get more draft capital by working with both teams since NY owns a protected Dallas pick. Adjusting those protections would open up how many picks they can send and give some certainty. I know its the nerdy internet GM thing to blow up the team but its also the exact right move sometimes.
 
I think Sharpe is a huge upside guy... the profile, the way he moves, and the jumper look pretty amazing. Don't understand why he didn't play but if he had I wonder what the opinion would be of him. I'd need to know what type of kid he is but he might be a steal at 5-8.

I haven't done my own research there but both prospects seem pretty solid.
My overall point is that every single damn draft has a 6'3-6'6 scoring guard with high upside.

Of course they all dont pan out, and 90% of them wont have the immediate impact Mitchell had, but a decent amount of them are on Mitchell's level or better relatively soon
 
My overall point is that every single damn draft has a 6'3-6'6 scoring guard with high upside.

Of course they all dont pan out, and 90% of them wont have the immediate impact Mitchell had, but a decent amount of them are on Mitchell's level or better relatively soon
I agree... the thing with Donovan is that his passing and playmaking needed to be better by now if he was going to jump to another tier. The defense is also an issue. Sharpe and Ivey may have enough length to get their shots in the midrange more consistently as well.

I love Donovan but at this point he will only have incremental improvements. He's not irreplaceable. He's hard to replace.
 
I think we have seen how our team will perform with Donovan and no Rudy... we will be similar to the Beal Wizards... I think Donovan will really start to lose value if we end up sucking. I'd just move em both now and take a premium on Donovan.

If the deals suck then teams can piss off and we will do something else... but everyone seems to be in win now mode and I think we'd do quite well.
 
People will hate it, but this the kind of trade you got to make if you want to build around Mitchell. Use the Philly pick to get a solid role playing wing.




View attachment 12024
Simmons is exactly the type of player needed to play alongside Donovan. Big ball handler who could guard other teams #1. Like you said people would probably hate it but I think being in a place like Utah is what Simmons needs. The problem still exists though that you need other big long defenders who can shoot + you'd need to pickup a stretch 5.
 
People will hate it, but this the kind of trade you got to make if you want to build around Mitchell. Use the Philly pick to get a solid role playing wing.




View attachment 12024
Its a huge upside move... I think you could even swipe another pick because BS has teams shook. Maybe you just add in Sharpe and Cam Thomas (no opinion on either guy) and dump Gay in the trade too. If BS rehabbed his value you could flip him later maybe... there is like a 5-10% chance dude never plays again.

I also think you could be the third team and send him elsewhere for picks and cap fodder. Brooklyn wants good players and not picks in return for him so may need a mediator. He likely needs a small market with little media attention but also is like a big market LA type of personality. If he actually played this type of deal is a homerun but he's in uncharted territory.
 
People will hate it, but this the kind of trade you got to make if you want to build around Mitchell. Use the Philly pick to get a solid role playing wing.




View attachment 12024

Kevin O'Connor suggested this today in his latest article. I would absolutely hate it. Simmons would be nothing but a headache and I don't think he would be happy in Utah at all.

Potential options are limited, but should be explored. One of my favorite hypotheticals is sending Simmons to Utah for Rudy Gobert. Danny Ainge was a big fan of Simmons in the 2016 draft. Donovan Mitchell and Simmons could make for a potent pick-and-roll duo, and Gobert would anchor Brooklyn’s defense. Gobert has his own offensive limitations but they’d be minimized with the shot-making of KD and Irving.

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/4/27/23044428/nets-rumors-offseason-kyrie-irving-ben-simmons
 
Its a huge upside move... I think you could even swipe another pick because BS has teams shook. Maybe you just add in Sharpe and Cam Thomas (no opinion on either guy) and dump Gay in the trade too. If BS rehabbed his value you could flip him later maybe... there is like a 5-10% chance dude never plays again.

I also think you could be the third team and send him elsewhere for picks and cap fodder. Brooklyn wants good players and not picks in return for him so may need a mediator. He likely needs a small market with little media attention but also is like a big market LA type of personality. If he actually played this type of deal is a homerun but he's in uncharted territory.
Bruce Brown would be the guy I'd really want if Utah could negotiate another player in there. I'm sure you could also get Sharpe or Claxton as well since they will need one less big man.

I don't think Utah could get another pick tho
 
Yeah thats why I posted it, though it's something I've thought about for a minute.

Simmons has a ton of talent, so I can definitely see the appeal. It's just really hard for me to see it working out. He seems like one of the last guys in the league that would want to be in Utah.
 
Bruce Brown would be the guy I'd really want if Utah could negotiate another player in there. I'm sure you could also get Sharpe or Claxton as well since they will need one less big man.

I don't think Utah could get another pick tho
Brown and Claxton would both have to be sign and trades... which isn't impossible of course... just makes it harder.

I'd want two picks in a BS deal... if he doesn't come in and play it becomes impossible to move him and he may just go the Larry Sanders, Royce White route and just bounce.
 
Back
Top