** Warning ** OneBrow style post ahead. Proceed with caution.
Yes, we have had this conversation before. I fully admit that you are light years ahead of me regarding the subject, and I appreciate the fact that you are willing to indulge my thoughts and opinions. That being said, I'm going to disagree with a lot of it. Regarding your statement, "It is simply that people find it unacceptable to "insult" religion.", there is a reason for that; In America, the first amendment grants a fundamental right to practice however you see fit, without fear of persecution. Thomas Jefferson wrote, "No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities." In short, let people worship however the **** they want. I expect people to let me worship how, what, and wherever I want, and I expect to do it free from ridicule and insults. If certain aspects of someone's faith requires or inspires them to commit crimes, then hate the crime and the individual, but don't hate the religion.
Why do dog bites follow Pit Bulls wherever they go? Why does Prozac follow Mormon women wherever they go? Why does incest and rape follow FLDS wherever they go? Why does intellectual honesty follow Vinylone wherever he goes? The reason for all of those questions is simple: Perception. Stupid irresponsible owners cause most Pit Bull problems, not the dogs themselves. Some Mormon women suffer, no doubt about it (read here:https://home.teleport.com/~packham/prozac.htm ), but the majority of them don't. Warren Jeffs is a despicable human being who raped, tormented, and bullied his way into power. For every scum bag like Jeff's, there are thousands of hard working, loyal, and decent FLDS members. Vinylone is short. It happens. Again, it all boils down to perception. Of course terrorism follows Muslims, because that is the only time that the media will report it. A simple google of "Christian Terrorism" will show you what I am talking about. The fact is, more people are killed in the name of Christianity's God than Islam's God. American's don't want to hear about it, and thus, the media doesn't report it. Buzz words like, "Terrorism", "Radicals", and "Extremists" have all been created in order to fuel this nonsense.
I just watched something that was relevant: https://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010...ng-about-10-percent-muslims-being-terrorists/ It is four minutes long, and worth the watch. If you agree with the stats in the video, then can we really call Islam an "ideology" (in the terms you put it)? It appears to me that, as in my above examples, perception has trumped actual fact.
First off, I don't think that terrorism is an issue with Islam, but I digress -- To your other point, it is not ok for women to be treated like filth. I hope you don't ever turn a blind eye to any type of violence, especially if it claims innocent lives; I don't think you ever would. However, I will say again, I believe it is the people who are making those decisions, not the religion itself. Does the religion reflect the culture and vise versa? It probably does. Is it just as simple as saying, "If you're a woman in a violent situation, just leave."? No, of course not. How do you tell a polygamous person that they are being treated poorly, that their choices are harming themselves and their families, or that they are flat out wrong -- when they are telling you that they are just fine? How do you tell a devout Muslim those same things? Or a Mormon, or Catholic, or a homosexual? (those are hypothetical questions) I don't have an answer, or even a suggestion, but I won't relegate myself to the lowest form of thinking or communicating by insulting or demeaning someone's faith. I'm shocked to see someone as brilliant as you do just that. Leave the bigotry and ignorant hate for the dimmest portion of our population. (see PearlWatson)
Sorry Siro, there is no sufficient justification when attacking someone for their faith or beliefs*. What you think of as "irrationality" obviously isn't irrational to some people. People are still people, with their own brains, bodies, and thoughts, which means if what they've been taught doesn't jive anymore, they can stop. Again, religion never forced anyone to strap a bomb to their chest and blow up a cafe.
*special justification for pedophiles and Utah fans is fine.
Is it ever ok to judge others? We're all guilty of it, but seriously, is it ever ok? Classic "Chicken or the Egg" situation. If you lived outside of the US and knew that each and every American hated you, your religion, your belief's, and your country -- and on top of that, they were bombing your city, destroyed your home, and American troops murdered your father and three brothers, all in the name of Oil -- wouldn't you embrace what guys like Bin Laden were preaching? That's hypothetical to the max, but how off is it really? I don't know why the United States has decided to wage war on the Middle East (conspiracy's abound), but you have to think that if we had stayed out of their business, or if we absolutely had to get involved, done it with much greater diplomacy, that the vast majority of terrorist attacks on the US would have never come to fruition. So, which came first: Radical Jihadist's killing Americans in the name of Allah, or Americans asking for it by initially invading the Middle East, and by then perpetuating the hate and fear mongering of Islam?
Preach on! This is a mighty effort, and it has been going strong for some time, but unfortunately, you don't hear about it or read about it, unless you actually go looking for it. Google "Muslims against terrorism" or just click here. How many of those have you heard about? Again, it always boils down to perception.
If there were a group of fanatical Mormons that were hunting down and killing the same invaders who murdered my family, bombed my city and burned my home -- I'd probably hide them too. I have a feeling that most of us would. As for wanting them wanting a "Strict Islamic Rule", well gosh, if that's what they want then why not let them have it? Are they not big boys that can make their own decisions? Just because we think democracy is groovy doesn't mean that we cram it down everyone's throat.
I don't doubt it, nor do I begrudge them their hatred. I'd hate us too. As for being unrequited, of course it is. The (very)vocal majority doesn't talk about tolerance or acceptance, and in fact, drives around with Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and Sean Hannity blasting out of their windows while saying **** like, "If you're not with us, you're against us." or "If you don't like it, LEAVE!". Going up against that kind of thinking is pretty much moot. You want to see just how low America is? Listen to an hour of those guys I mentioned above. It is no wonder at all why most of the world hates America. What I do find comfort and take much pride in, is just what you said: "A culture that tries to understand and help everyone, regardless of the occasional villainy of their governments." I don't know if you were being facetious, but underneath the ugly shell that the world sees lies the America that I'm proud to be a part of. We can be bitterest of enemies one day, yet come together for the benefit of all during times of tragedy. Overall I think that is more of a Human trait, but I like to claim it as our own.
Look, man, I don't like to argue with you because you're a decent dude. I think I understand where you're coming from and I appreciate why you think the way you do. Do I expect to change your mind based on anything I've said here? Nope. Just like it's doubtful that I'll change my tune anytime soon. However, even in disagreement, I do still find nuggets of truth and thought provoking ideas in all of your posts. At the very worst, I hope you can say the same for mine.
PBUH
We've had this discussion before. You're focusing too much on my demeanor. I do need to control my temper a bit better, kind of like One Brow does. But none of what I said is wrong. It is simply that people find it unacceptable to "insult" religion.
Yes, we have had this conversation before. I fully admit that you are light years ahead of me regarding the subject, and I appreciate the fact that you are willing to indulge my thoughts and opinions. That being said, I'm going to disagree with a lot of it. Regarding your statement, "It is simply that people find it unacceptable to "insult" religion.", there is a reason for that; In America, the first amendment grants a fundamental right to practice however you see fit, without fear of persecution. Thomas Jefferson wrote, "No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities." In short, let people worship however the **** they want. I expect people to let me worship how, what, and wherever I want, and I expect to do it free from ridicule and insults. If certain aspects of someone's faith requires or inspires them to commit crimes, then hate the crime and the individual, but don't hate the religion.
So a small percentage of Muslims are actual terrorists. Nobody is denying that. But why does terrorism follow Muslims wherever they go? A coincidence?
Why do dog bites follow Pit Bulls wherever they go? Why does Prozac follow Mormon women wherever they go? Why does incest and rape follow FLDS wherever they go? Why does intellectual honesty follow Vinylone wherever he goes? The reason for all of those questions is simple: Perception. Stupid irresponsible owners cause most Pit Bull problems, not the dogs themselves. Some Mormon women suffer, no doubt about it (read here:https://home.teleport.com/~packham/prozac.htm ), but the majority of them don't. Warren Jeffs is a despicable human being who raped, tormented, and bullied his way into power. For every scum bag like Jeff's, there are thousands of hard working, loyal, and decent FLDS members. Vinylone is short. It happens. Again, it all boils down to perception. Of course terrorism follows Muslims, because that is the only time that the media will report it. A simple google of "Christian Terrorism" will show you what I am talking about. The fact is, more people are killed in the name of Christianity's God than Islam's God. American's don't want to hear about it, and thus, the media doesn't report it. Buzz words like, "Terrorism", "Radicals", and "Extremists" have all been created in order to fuel this nonsense.
And while a small percentage of Muslims are terrorists, a massive percentage of terrorists are Muslims. How atrocious the consequences of an ideology must be before it can be criticized?
I just watched something that was relevant: https://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010...ng-about-10-percent-muslims-being-terrorists/ It is four minutes long, and worth the watch. If you agree with the stats in the video, then can we really call Islam an "ideology" (in the terms you put it)? It appears to me that, as in my above examples, perception has trumped actual fact.
And terrorism is not the only issue with Islam. Far from it. Why is it okay to program women to think that being treated like filth is the only way for them to maintain their dignity in the eyes of god? Why should I turn a blind eye to the sectarian violence that has claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people in the past decade? Because it's not the religion, it's the people? How strange it is to think that some old ideas written by men of ignorance deserve more protection than the people they destroy.
First off, I don't think that terrorism is an issue with Islam, but I digress -- To your other point, it is not ok for women to be treated like filth. I hope you don't ever turn a blind eye to any type of violence, especially if it claims innocent lives; I don't think you ever would. However, I will say again, I believe it is the people who are making those decisions, not the religion itself. Does the religion reflect the culture and vise versa? It probably does. Is it just as simple as saying, "If you're a woman in a violent situation, just leave."? No, of course not. How do you tell a polygamous person that they are being treated poorly, that their choices are harming themselves and their families, or that they are flat out wrong -- when they are telling you that they are just fine? How do you tell a devout Muslim those same things? Or a Mormon, or Catholic, or a homosexual? (those are hypothetical questions) I don't have an answer, or even a suggestion, but I won't relegate myself to the lowest form of thinking or communicating by insulting or demeaning someone's faith. I'm shocked to see someone as brilliant as you do just that. Leave the bigotry and ignorant hate for the dimmest portion of our population. (see PearlWatson)
The issues with religion in general, and Islam in particular, are real and incredibly serious. The fact that people are trained to revere irrationality since the day they're born only makes my attacks more justified.
Sorry Siro, there is no sufficient justification when attacking someone for their faith or beliefs*. What you think of as "irrationality" obviously isn't irrational to some people. People are still people, with their own brains, bodies, and thoughts, which means if what they've been taught doesn't jive anymore, they can stop. Again, religion never forced anyone to strap a bomb to their chest and blow up a cafe.
*special justification for pedophiles and Utah fans is fine.
I am sorry decent people get offended by my attitude. But the lives of those murdered in the name of Allah hold far, FAR, more value than the feelings of those who enable them. And they do enable them. The tens of millions of who support terrorist organizations financially, politically, and ideologically are part of the problem. And those people make up a much larger percentage than 0.01% or even 10%. When will it be okay for me to judge?
Is it ever ok to judge others? We're all guilty of it, but seriously, is it ever ok? Classic "Chicken or the Egg" situation. If you lived outside of the US and knew that each and every American hated you, your religion, your belief's, and your country -- and on top of that, they were bombing your city, destroyed your home, and American troops murdered your father and three brothers, all in the name of Oil -- wouldn't you embrace what guys like Bin Laden were preaching? That's hypothetical to the max, but how off is it really? I don't know why the United States has decided to wage war on the Middle East (conspiracy's abound), but you have to think that if we had stayed out of their business, or if we absolutely had to get involved, done it with much greater diplomacy, that the vast majority of terrorist attacks on the US would have never come to fruition. So, which came first: Radical Jihadist's killing Americans in the name of Allah, or Americans asking for it by initially invading the Middle East, and by then perpetuating the hate and fear mongering of Islam?
How about the Muslim public rise up and reject those organizations loudly, publicly, and with overwhelming numbers?
Preach on! This is a mighty effort, and it has been going strong for some time, but unfortunately, you don't hear about it or read about it, unless you actually go looking for it. Google "Muslims against terrorism" or just click here. How many of those have you heard about? Again, it always boils down to perception.
Instead of, you know, sheltering them in their homes and towns? But no, they have their protests and their marches, and they paint them with words like democracy and freedom. But what they really want? A strict Islamic rule. Egypt's revolution was about getting the Muslim Brotherhood in power. Pretty much all of the protests related to the Arab Spring are about replacing "pro-Western" dictators with Islamic ones. Regardless of whatever fantasy about the longing for freedom that Westerners like to indulge in.
If there were a group of fanatical Mormons that were hunting down and killing the same invaders who murdered my family, bombed my city and burned my home -- I'd probably hide them too. I have a feeling that most of us would. As for wanting them wanting a "Strict Islamic Rule", well gosh, if that's what they want then why not let them have it? Are they not big boys that can make their own decisions? Just because we think democracy is groovy doesn't mean that we cram it down everyone's throat.
Edit: Also make no mistake, to them you ARE the enemy. Not to the terrorists, but to the average Muslim. All the liberal talk about tolerance and acceptance is unrequited. But it's okay. That's what makes the West superior. A culture that tries to understand and help everyone, regardless of the occasional villainy of their governments.
I don't doubt it, nor do I begrudge them their hatred. I'd hate us too. As for being unrequited, of course it is. The (very)vocal majority doesn't talk about tolerance or acceptance, and in fact, drives around with Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and Sean Hannity blasting out of their windows while saying **** like, "If you're not with us, you're against us." or "If you don't like it, LEAVE!". Going up against that kind of thinking is pretty much moot. You want to see just how low America is? Listen to an hour of those guys I mentioned above. It is no wonder at all why most of the world hates America. What I do find comfort and take much pride in, is just what you said: "A culture that tries to understand and help everyone, regardless of the occasional villainy of their governments." I don't know if you were being facetious, but underneath the ugly shell that the world sees lies the America that I'm proud to be a part of. We can be bitterest of enemies one day, yet come together for the benefit of all during times of tragedy. Overall I think that is more of a Human trait, but I like to claim it as our own.
Look, man, I don't like to argue with you because you're a decent dude. I think I understand where you're coming from and I appreciate why you think the way you do. Do I expect to change your mind based on anything I've said here? Nope. Just like it's doubtful that I'll change my tune anytime soon. However, even in disagreement, I do still find nuggets of truth and thought provoking ideas in all of your posts. At the very worst, I hope you can say the same for mine.
PBUH