What's new

Breaking Bad (thread will have *spoilers*)

Speaking purely from a business perspective, Todd just did it wrong. They should have grabbed the kid and the bike and thrown them both off a cliff just to make it look like an accident. If the topography doesn't allow for that then at least make it look like he banged his head on something because he was driving a little out of control. A rock or a railroad tie or something. A gunshot causes extra headaches and scrutiny.

They bury the kid in the desert and nobody finds him for the next 20 years. Not a huge headache. I think it just shows how cold blooded Walt is now and how Jesse still isn't completely callous.
 
Speaking purely from a business perspective, Todd just did it wrong. They should have grabbed the kid and the bike and thrown them both off a cliff just to make it look like an accident. If the topography doesn't allow for that then at least make it look like he banged his head on something because he was driving a little out of control. A rock or a railroad tie or something. A gunshot causes extra headaches and scrutiny.

Or, just act like noting inappropriate is going on and let the kid be on his way.

I'm probably not cut out for train robbery.
 
Or, just act like noting inappropriate is going on and let the kid be on his way.

I mean, that's probably too big a risk to take just because you don't know what the kid is going to say or do in the immediate future.

How/When is Walt planning on getting the bug and the transmitter out of Hank's office?
 
I mean, that's probably too big a risk to take just because you don't know what the kid is going to say or do in the immediate future.

How/When is Walt planning on getting the bug and the transmitter out of Hank's office?

I totally agree. The kid goes home and says mom guess what I saw today. Too big of loose end.

Bug? I thought it was bugS. Didn't he put something on the PC tower as well?
 
I totally agree. The kid goes home and says mom guess what I saw today. Too big of loose end.

Bug? I thought it was bugS. Didn't he put something on the PC tower as well?

I assumed that was the transmitter that was allowing them to listen to the bug over the internet.
 
so it's okay to kill hookers, druggies, gays, adults etc.
but not okay to kill children who are cruel to animals?

Sounds about right!!

But honestly the kid wasn't expecting to die that day. Most of the other fatalities in the show, beside the plane crash, we're to people involved in drug related activity where one of the hazards of the job is death!!
 
so it's okay to kill hookers, druggies, gays, adults etc.
but not okay to kill children who are cruel to animals?

Cruel to animals? You're not talking about that big bug he caught, are you? He should have stepped on that as soon as he saw it, yo.
 
My guess is that the kid loved animals and spiders as he was riding around with a mason jar in his breast pocket so he could collect one without hurting it.
 
My guess is that the kid loved animals and spiders as he was riding around with a mason jar in his breast pocket so he could collect one without hurting it.

How do you know he wasn't a budding young meth dealer and was collecting spider venom to off his classmates that were interfering with business?
 
My guess is that the kid loved animals and spiders as he was riding around with a mason jar in his breast pocket so he could collect one without hurting it.

so if i come in your home put you in a big glass jar and ride off with you in a jar. thats not hurting you?
 
so if i come in your home put you in a big glass jar and ride off with you in a jar. thats not hurting you?

Get off it! People who have a passion for something seek it out. If the kid loves animals he's going to want to learn about them and be around them.

If you are of the opinion that the spider is deserving of the same rights people have then I'd like to hear the spider make the argument. We, as humans, have the rights we have because we have the capacity to understand them and the desire to assert them. The spider is not in the same weight-class and doesn't enjoy the same benefits.

Are lions cruel to gazelles when they crush their throats and suffocate them to death? No. Why? Because they must eat gazelles to live and they don't have the capacity to empathize with the gazelle. It is only us, the greatest species in known existence, that can empathize with the suffering of other animals. It is only us who has the capacity to be either kind or cruel. Only we have the ability to choose. The lion isn't weighing the gazelles suffering against it's own hunger. The gazelle doesn't get the slightest bit of consideration from the lion. The lion completely lacks the ability to give a **** about the gazelle and any suffering it might endure.

Humans win. Every time.
 
Get off it! People who have a passion for something seek it out. If the kid loves animals he's going to want to learn about them and be around them.

If you are of the opinion that the spider is deserving of the same rights people have then I'd like to hear the spider make the argument. We, as humans, have the rights we have because we have the capacity to understand them and the desire to assert them. The spider is not in the same weight-class and doesn't enjoy the same benefits.

Are lions cruel to gazelles when they crush their throats and suffocate them to death? No. Why? Because they must eat gazelles to live and they don't have the capacity to empathize with the gazelle. It is only us, the greatest species in known existence, that can empathize with the suffering of other animals. It is only us who has the capacity to be either kind or cruel. Only we have the ability to choose. The lion isn't weighing the gazelles suffering against it's own hunger. The gazelle doesn't get the slightest bit of consideration from the lion. The lion completely lacks the ability to give a **** about the gazelle and any suffering it might endure.

Humans win. Every time.

Homo sapiens > Arachnids
 
If you are of the opinion that the blacks is deserving of the same rights white people have then I'd like to hear the n**** make the argument. We, as aryans, have the rights we have because we have the capacity to understand them and the desire to assert them. Then**** is not in the same weight-class and doesn't enjoy the same benefits.

see turned it around for you :P

60 years ago this was a valid sentence :P
 
see turned it around for you :P

60 years ago this was a valid sentence :P

No, it wasn't. Black people were fully capable of understanding and asserting their rights. You have completely failed to understand my post. 60 years from now spiders are not going to be asserting their rights. Humans may assert some right for spiders, but spiders will play no part. They are completely incapable of participating in such things.
 
Back
Top