What's new
By:

Caesars Palace NBA 19-20 Over/Under Win Totals

Lord Bullingdon said:
The Kings are gonna go over 37 wins. Unless they get brutalized with injuries or Bogdanovic manages to have a ****** season, thats a .500 team.

Every team is gonna sustain injuries but the troika of Fox - Bagley - Heild is stronger than ppl realize.

If Dwayne Dedmon and Trevor Ariza can shoot the 3 well for them its gonna be bigtime. Full season of Harrison BArnes and plus I genuinely think Luke Walton is gonna do a much better job than Joerger, in the lockerroom for sure/

I would defintely say you're safest overs are gonna be in the 20 and 30 win teams and the unders are the 40 and 50's, so i wouldnt gravitate to utah immediately. This idea works in line with avoiding injury risk, which is a very real concern in such a wager.
Click to expand...
*yawn*
 
Who cares about these ****ing losers trying to predict how these inferior teams will end up, what I want to know is who's going to be clamoring to join us at trade deadline when everyone realizes we are the ****?
 
SCS said:
The easiest money on this entire list imo is the Spurs getting the over. They're basically adding Dejounte Murray and Demarre Carroll to the same roster they had last season that won 48 games. 43.5 is hilarious. I hate the Spurs but I'm gonna get rich from people underestimating Gregg freaking Popovich every year lol.
Click to expand...

The Spurs and Warriors' lines should be reversed. With Klay out til March, Ws shouldn't win more than 43 - 45 games, imo. Spurs win 47 or 48 games like clockwork.
 
I can't believe how some of you are underestimating Warriors. They still have Curry and Green and added All star Russell. I honestly think they will win more than Lakers.
 
MVP said:
I can't believe how some of you are underestimating Warriors. They still have Curry and Green and added All star Russell. I honestly think they will win more than Lakers.
Click to expand...
I have no idea what to expect from the warriors. I'm a big time curry homer though (he is easily the best offensive player in the league) and I wouldn't count them out as long as he is healthy.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Wes Mantooth said:
Should be? How?
Click to expand...
Multi-step process, would likely require signing a ~10 year vet or two at the minimum* that would be happy to collect the check, be good in practice and the locker room, and know they might be traded as salary filler.

Package Exum and filler for, say, Marvin Williams (who might be a good player to have just to have). Then maybe trading Marvin with salary filler and some minor-ish assets (two seconds?).

I know there are a lot of moving parts, but any contender that could cobble together the expiring salary should have this as a potential-objective down the road since OKC in this conference is just not going to be very competitive and it could well be that they’d be better off sucking anyway.

I have lingering concerns that this team is both a little long in the tooth and shallow on firepower coming into the playoffs. Gallinari would allow the Jazz to both be generous on load-management for him, Bojan, and Ingles; and attack the opposition with a relentless wave of very good basketball players. Would also give the Jazz Gallinari’s bird rights which could prove useful. With GSW seriously-hobbled, The Nets without KD, and Ingles, Bojan, and Conley only getting older (not to mention Conley being able to opt-out), this is also a very real year to ****ing go for it.

*this ship looks to have sailed since the Jazz had to have NWG for some reason, but I think they could still theoretically sign players mid-season if one of their fringe guys is really just not worth the investment.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top