What's new

Caitlyn Jenner

@Dal, so sex wise, he's still a he, right? That has nothing to do with gender identity right? So isn't hantlers still correct in saying he?

Boats have no sex, yet boaters often refer to them using feminine pronouns and not the inanimate pronoun. Suggests gender has more influence on the use of gender pronouns than sex.
 
Boats have no sex, yet boaters often refer to them using feminine pronouns and not the inanimate pronoun. Suggests gender has more influence on the use of gender pronouns than sex.

Not talking about gender, but sex. He is a boy as far as his sex is concerned, right?
 
Not talking about gender, but sex. He is a boy as far as his sex is concerned, right?

Caitlyn's sex is biologically male-- but her gender is female. People identify with gender, not with sex. Caitlyn is a she. It's disrespectful and transphobic to refer to her as otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Boats have no sex, yet boaters often refer to them using feminine pronouns and not the inanimate pronoun. Suggests gender has more influence on the use of gender pronouns than sex.

Good post (one of many)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Caitlyn's sex is biologically male-- but her gender is female. People identify with gender, not with sex. Caitlyn is a she. It's disrespectful and transphobic to refer to her as otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now it's been over ten years since I got my Anthro. degree, but so far as I remember, female can't be a gender. I believe it would be more accurate to say biologically male, but her gender is woman.

My classes that had gender as a curriculum were focused primarily on the cultural and societal role of gender, not the biological relationship of sex to gender, so transgendered stuff is quite a gray area for me.
 
Caitlyn's sex is biologically male-- but her gender is female. People identify with gender, not with sex. Caitlyn is a she. It's disrespectful and transphobic to refer to her as otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hold the hell up.

Transphobic to say otherwise? So if I state I disagree, I'm afraid of transvestites? I can assure you I don't have a fear of them. But maybe I'm a muslimphobe too. Hell, I'm probably an organicphobe in that case.

Or if people disagree with Christianity, can I go out and call them disrespectful christianphobes? Is that how this works?
 
So lemme ask you Dala, you've got a middle school aged girl playing some sport. There's some biologically male who identifies as a woman that gets to play on that team. You cool with them sharing a locker room? I'm just curious, because I would have to say I would not be comfortable with that at all.
 
So lemme ask you Dala, you've got a middle school aged girl playing some sport. There's some biologically male who identifies as a woman that gets to play on that team. You cool with them sharing a locker room? I'm just curious, because I would have to say I would not be comfortable with that at all.

Yes, and I'd hold the trans-athlete to the same set of standards & conduct that I would hold all of my athletes to. If I heard of any abuse in the locker room I would deal with it swiftly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So lemme ask you Dala, you've got a middle school aged girl playing some sport. There's some biologically male who identifies as a woman that gets to play on that team. You cool with them sharing a locker room? I'm just curious, because I would have to say I would not be comfortable with that at all.

As a societal issue, this concept has been showing up more frequently.

For athletics, often the restrictions for girl sports in school is that the participants have to be female. Sex testing was a big deal during the Beijing Olympics cycle.

There have been newsworthy items where male children identifying as girls and vice versa have had his/her parents at odds with schools on what bathrooms can be used.

Where problems truly lie is when one's gene makeup on the sex chromosome doesn't neatly fit into male and female, which makes that individual's gender in western culture nearly impossible to obtain since western culture fixates so heavily on equating sex and gender.
 
Hold the hell up.

Transphobic to say otherwise? So if I state I disagree, I'm afraid of transvestites?

Yes because you're denying their right their own identity. By calling Ms. Jenner things like "he-she", or "he", you're basically stripping her of a right to her identity-- regardless if you agree with it or not. Try and put yourself in her shoes.

I can assure you I don't have a fear of them. But maybe I'm a muslimphobe too. Hell, I'm probably an organicphobe in that case.

Them scary Mozlems.

Or if people disagree with Christianity, can I go out and call them disrespectful christianphobes? Is that how this works?

it would be as if I went around calling all of yall heathens, and stripped you of your right to identify as Christian. That would make me a 'Christianphobe'


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
See I disagree. I don't care if you say I'm not a Christian, you don't have the authority to determine those things. I mean do you honestly think you saying I'm not a Christian would strip me of that identity? That's asinine. And I wouldn't call you a Christianphobe, as you're merely disagreeing with it, which we should have the right to do. A society that is not allowed to disagree with things is no free society.

Again, phobia indicates having a fear of something. Disagreeing with something does not mean you have a fear of it.

Finally, I never called Bruce a "he-she", I called him a he, because that's what I view him as. Now my view doesn't make him any more, or less what he is. I'm not denying his viewpoints, he gets to keep those.
 
Caitlyn's sex is biologically male-- but her gender is female. People identify with gender, not with sex. Caitlyn is a she. It's disrespectful and transphobic to refer to her as otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


soon taxpayers will be paying for operation for these people.
courtesy of obamacare :D

aah yes the freedom leech of others
 
Yes because you're denying their right their own identity. By calling Ms. Jenner things like "he-she", or "he", you're basically stripping her of a right to her identity-- regardless if you agree with it or not. Try and put yourself in her shoes.



Them scary Mozlems.



it would be as if I went around calling all of yall heathens, and stripped you of your right to identify as Christian. That would make me a 'Christianphobe'


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

calling someone a xxxxxcist or a xxxxxphobe shopws lack of inteligence.
it is usually a diversionary tactic so you dont have to come up with arguments
 
Im a little late to the conversation, but I think Caitlyn has the right to do what she wants. Its wrong to make fun of her or make derogatory remarks. That said, I believe in an open forum discussion and also think its wrong to label people phobic if they disagree with it. There are a lot of reasons why someone might think its wrong but as long as they are respectful it doesnt make them small minded.
 
Yes because you're denying their right their own identity. By calling Ms. Jenner things like "he-she", or "he", you're basically stripping her of a right to her identity-- regardless if you agree with it or not. Try and put yourself in her shoes.



Them scary Mozlems.



it would be as if I went around calling all of yall heathens, and stripped you of your right to identify as Christian. That would make me a 'Christianphobe'


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

but this cuts both was
isnt redefining a religious concept as marriage denying all these religious "nuts". their identity of holy matirmony?

you wont answer cus you are a coward. but this whole denying identity argument cuts both ways.


if disagreeing withsomeone something makes u a phobe or a cist. well meet me the BIGGEST PHOBYcIsT
 
See I disagree. I don't care if you say I'm not a Christian, you don't have the authority to determine those things. I mean do you honestly think you saying I'm not a Christian would strip me of that identity?

The problem with this is that this entire comparison is 100% apples to oranges. You simply aren't trying to put yourself in a woman's shoes who's undergone a sex-change. Gender identity is so much more noticeable, and has so much more of a history of people calling their identities mental disorders, and that they shouldn't be allowed to embrace the identities that they do. You simply aren't understanding, my friend.

That's asinine. And I wouldn't call you a Christianphobe, as you're merely disagreeing with it, which we should have the right to do. A society that is not allowed to disagree with things is no free society.

And a hateful society is an unjust society that Jesus would frown upon.

Again, phobia indicates having a fear of something. Disagreeing with something does not mean you have a fear of it.

It's a common generalization made by the trans-community-- due to the majority of their critics being very inconsiderate of their identities (largely out of fear & not understanding). Like all generalizations, it's a 'generalization'-- still, I'd rather be labelled as a transphobe than a prick (which is quite-honestly what you are, when you call a harmless individual something they don't like to be called)

Finally, I never called Bruce a "he-she", I called him a he, because that's what I view him as. Now my view doesn't make him any more, or less what he is. I'm not denying his viewpoints, he gets to keep those.

That's the thing though-- referring to Caitlyn as 'he' is simply incredibly rude to someone who was flipped over their entire life & strained a 20< year marriage with multiple children simply to embrace this identity she always felt lost without. I'm not sure what's wrong with calling people what they want to be called.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I, for one, am tottttttalllly shocked that Hantlers is wiffffffffing this thread.
 
Back
Top