What's new

Chinese train never stops for passengers but they still board/exit

Radical.

Would be awesome if taking trax to a jazz game didn't take 4 times as long as driving to one.


dat jazzfanz.com mobile app doe
 
Radical.

Would be awesome if taking trax to a jazz game didn't take 4 times as long as driving to one.


dat jazzfanz.com mobile app doe

This is the issue with Trax. In other cities mass transit is twice as fast to move around the city then driving.
 
This is the issue with Trax. In other cities mass transit is twice as fast to move around the city then driving.

Our streets just need to get a little more congested and we'll be there.
 
For as much **** as the Chinese get for their lack of outside the box thinking, there does seem to be spades of it in conceptual form at least. Pretty cool. I'd like to see the people flow in action though. Seems like a lot of shuffling to do in a train based on how that website says that aspect is supposed to work.
 
I am constantly giving the Chinese **** for their lack of outside the box thinking.

I'll give credit where credit is due doe.
 
So when the stationary on-boarding part fails to start moving, and the same compartment on the incoming train coming up from behind fails to stop, what happens then?
 
So when the stationary on-boarding part fails to start moving, and the same compartment on the incoming train coming up from behind fails to stop, what happens then?

I am sure there are no fail safes put in place for any malfunctions of any parts of these new innovative trains.

"**** it, we don't have time. Just make it so everything blows up if anything goes wrong."
 
This concept is not entirely new. I know I've seen plans for commuter trains that use smaller vehicles to dock and pickup/drop off passengers before. I think it's the specific way this one works that is new.
 
Trains crash with some regularity due to mechanical failure as it is, not to mention operator error and poor maintenance, and making the system more complex introduces more potential failure points. Obviously being a concept there is a lot more to do to move to actual production and putting this thing in use, but it would be spectacular the first time this docking system fails.
 
Trains crash with some regularity due to mechanical failure as it is, not to mention operator error and poor maintenance, and making the system more complex introduces more potential failure points. Obviously being a concept there is a lot more to do to move to actual production and putting this thing in use, but it would be spectacular the first time this docking system fails.

Try telling that to the victims families you ****ing *******.
 
The only problem with this is people getting from the pod to the train and back again. People are generally morons and I can see many getting cut in half trying to catch the pod at the last minute or go back for their phone. Every pod would have to come with a bouncer for this to work.
 
The only problem with this is people getting from the pod to the train and back again. People are generally morons and I can see many getting cut in half trying to catch the pod at the last minute or go back for their phone. Every pod would have to come with a bouncer for this to work.

Or a door that locks before the pod dismounts.
 
This concept is not entirely new. I know I've seen plans for commuter trains that use smaller vehicles to dock and pickup/drop off passengers before. I think it's the specific way this one works that is new.

See, those chinese people are still thinking inside the box. Just making the box the cheapest, most economical box you have ever seen. Well, you might see millions of them, because they are mass producing them so quickly...
 
The connection between the pod and the main train would need to be like an elevator of some sort. That way the worst that would happen is you get stuck in the elevator and miss your stop, less likely to get stuck between the pod and train.
 
Back
Top