For the Hillary haters, I wonder how many can actually talk in an informed way about the specific policy positions she advocates to which they object, which makes her such an unpalatable candidate.
Or, is their objection to her based largely on objections to things such as private email server, Clinton Foundation (as if most other elected or former public officials don't also sell influence), irrational hatred, which has existed since back to Clinton Presidency, or personality issues unrelated to her capacity to governm (e.g., not dynamic, bitchy, etc.)? (None of which, IMHO, makes her an unacceptable candidate--and I'd say that for any Republican candidate as well). My guess is that the average Clinton hater relies much more heavily on the latter rather than the former.
As noted, she is establishment through and through, as have been nearly all other serious Presidential candidates and winners and will likely govern as such, although probably with a bit of a progressive bent in terms of social policies, reasonably muscular foreign policy, but, like Obama and those before him, with her lips surgically implanted on Wall Street's ***.