What's new

Controversial question. Why are most athletes black?

The Blue Elephant

Well-Known Member
When I run for president in the USA in a couple decades I hope they never dig back my internet history and find things like this (along with my other folder titled "don't click me").

I was wondering what yall think the reason that sports is so Afro dominated? It appears it is mainly in sports were running speed is a major factor (which is a lot of them). I heard about something called Allen's rule which states that animals that live closer to the equator have longer limbs on average. There are no animals like giraffes in the arctic because it would loose too much heat. If they did live there they would have shorter limbs. This also applies to humans so it makes it so humans in warmer climate have longer limbs on average. Basketball fans often know all about wingspan and know that usually the people with the freakishly long wingspans (like Bismack, Kawhi Leonard) are almost always black while people with short wingspans (like Gordon Hayward, J.J. Redick, Blake Griffin) belong to white or at least half white players. Remember this is average, not all.

Having long limbs seems to apply to center of gravity as well. Swimmers want a low center of gravity to keep as much of the water submersed in water, having to lift as little weight above water as possible and runners want a higher center of gravity to have lighter feat. This appears to be why most swimmers are white
https://www.pratt.duke.edu/news/speediest-athletes-its-all-center-gravity

Doesn't mean long limbed people can't swim and short limbed people can't run, it just may not be at an Olympic gold medal level. To be an elite athlete you need a combination of rare genetics and not having a couple of "ideal" things can be overcome.

Of course I want to stress that humans have very little genetic variation and a white human from Norway, a subsaharan black human, and a Korean dude even though come from very different parts of the earth have less genetic difference than two different chimps that live in the same valley.
 
AS a whole they are more athletically talented than other races. With obvious outliers of course.
 
Like everything else to do with people, it is a combination of genetics and culture. I recall Russell Westbrooke talking about how he wasn't a good athlete in High School. He had a sub 30 vertical, so he decided to be good at it and he worked at it. Over years of training he became a world class athlete. So he had a genes for potential athletic ability. But he had the cultural imprint that he needed to work for it. It takes both.

Every once in a while you find a Caucasian pro athletic who is an elite athlete. But I think there are more that remain latent athletes without the kinds of work may others put in.
 
There is much more genetic diversity in Africa than the rest of the world combined. So, the possibility that the optimal genetic mix for a given sport within the extremely diverse "African race" is greater.
 
What does "more athletically talented" mean in physiological terms?

Well if you took 100 black kids and 100 white kids. Then measured them in the 40, vertical jump, height, wingspan, cone drills etc .... I bet you'd find 7,8,9 of the top 10 in every one of them would be black.

There is the "only the most physically gifted africans were brought over as slaves" theory. Which makes sense. To say asians and African Americans are comparable in their genetic structure is truthful. But to say their physical attributes are comparable is laughable.
 
dude, it's actually the opposite, the most successful athletes are white and the sports are dominated by white people

basketball is exception of course
 
Well if you took 100 black kids and 100 white kids. Then measured them in the 40, vertical jump, height, wingspan, cone drills etc .... I bet you'd find 7,8,9 of the top 10 in every one of them would be black.

There is the "only the most physically gifted africans were brought over as slaves" theory. Which makes sense. To say asians and African Americans are comparable in their genetic structure is truthful. But to say their physical attributes are comparable is laughable.

Well physically gifted what does that mean? Stronger muscles? Less myostatin? More mitocondria?
 
dude, it's actually the opposite, the most successful athletes are white and the sports are dominated by white people

basketball is exception of course

NFL. How many CB's, Saftey's, and RB's are not black? Considering blacks are the minority in this country population wise it isn't an expected ratio.
 
bj brings up a good point. do you have any data or facts to prove "most athletes are black"? cant ask why if u dont even know if its true brah. dont be a racialist.
 
Well physically gifted what does that mean? Stronger muscles? Less myostatin? More mitocondria?

You are making this way too complicated. Better athlete means runs faster, jumps higher, is naturally stronger ... It doesn't need to be a science experiment. Just use your eyes.
 
Of course I want to stress that humans have very little genetic variation and a white human from Norway, a subsaharan black human, and a Korean dude even though come from very different parts of the earth have less genetic difference than two different chimps that live in the same valley.

WHAAAAAAAAT? this a news to me, please link.
 
depends on sports. baseball have lots of hispanic, asian players too. basketball and football are exception


Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
How about those damn athletes in NHL? You know who holds both men and women triple jump record right? How about Pole vault?
 
Here is some skinny white dude who's record is unbeaten by hundreds of more superior black athletes for already 20 years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgHYUDoG8_A
 
just go and look how many gold medals in different olympic sports have white and black people

i just don't see how the sports are Afro dominated from your first post
 
Back
Top