Sorry to pop bubbles, but average growth in 19-20 years is about a quarter inch. Maybe they are counting his 'fro?
You do realize that probably 75 % of men don't grow after 19 years old, and rarely women do. Do you know how to calculate average?
Sorry to pop bubbles, but average growth in 19-20 years is about a quarter inch. Maybe they are counting his 'fro?
Link? I would be shocked if the average for 19 year olds was that high. I would be surprised if it was 1/10th of an inch.
You do realize that probably 75 % of men don't grow after 19 years old, and rarely women do. Do you know how to calculate average?
Interesting. Thanks. But let's take a closer look at the image.
![]()
So on average, there's MAYBE a 3mm increase in height between 19 and 20. That's about 1/10th of an inch. So I guess I'm a bit surprised.
What average are you referring to, mode, median or mean? And which Pythagorean mean: arithmetic, geometric or harmonic? They are soooo hard to calculate, maybe you can help me, please.
I am glad we found an expert on male growth and mathematics. Can you provide the study you used to determine that 75% do not grow at all after age 19?
Yeah, didn't think so.
Mean = average. I don't know where median and mode come into play with an individual who is clearly outliers to the actual graph that you are referring to in the first place. I don't know the exact number of those who actually grow after 19, but I would bet money that more than half of men stop growing by 19. If one individual grows 1 inch and 3 don't grow, then the average, or median if you will, is going to be 1/4 inch. The whole point is any averages are based on a whole population and don't mean jack squat about an individual, especially if that individual is an outlier to that population.
I've been 6'0 since 6th grade. Thought I was gonna be tall back then.
It is perfectly possible that most men grow between 19 and 20. According to the chart, one can expect a growth between 0.5 mm (1/50th of an inch) for the shortest people, to about 5 mm for tallest (1/5th of an inch). I highly doubt even 5mm is perceptible at all. So for all intents an purposes, no notable growth happens, even if, technically, men continue to grow.
It is perfectly possible that most men grow between 19 and 20. According to the chart, one can expect a growth between 0.5 mm (1/50th of an inch) for the shortest people, to about 5 mm for tallest (1/5th of an inch). I highly doubt even 5mm is perceptible at all. So for all intents an purposes, no notable growth happens, even if, technically, men continue to grow.
You are off by a factor of 10. The chart is in cm not mm.
Mean = average. I don't know where median and mode come into play with an individual who is clearly outliers to the actual graph that you are referring to in the first place. I don't know the exact number of those who actually grow after 19, but I would bet money that more than half of men stop growing by 19. If one individual grows 1 inch and 3 don't grow, then the average, or median if you will, is going to be 1/4 inch. The whole point is any averages are based on a whole population and don't mean jack squat about an individual, especially if that individual is an outlier to that population.
And the chart shows growth of 1/2 of the cm. How many mm is that?
Colloquially, many folks commonly refer to "average" as "arithmetic mean." Mathematicians and statisticians have different ways to describe the "measurement of central tendency of a population." including the ones I mentioned.
To teach you the basics on one of these, median is the number separating the higher half of a population from the lower half. So in your example of 0,0,0,1, the median is 0 and the arithmetic mean (colloquial average) is 0.25. The median is not 0.25 as you state. Let me ask you the question you asked to me: "do you even know how to calculate an average?"
To have the average growth be 0.25 inches and more than half the population growing zero, is possible if you have a Poisson other highly asymmetric distribution. And while human characteristics are never perfectly symmetrical or normal (Gaussian distribution) they often often approach this, so your hypothesis is farfetched.
I am glad that you changed our opinion from 75% to 50% of men do not grow between 19-20 -- you are moving towards reality, congrats on that. But you still have not given me any empirical data to back it up -- or is this just your total guess?
Great use of big words. YOU ARE ENTIRELY MISSING THE POINT. YOUR CHART IS WORTHLESS WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN INDIVIDUAL. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY GROW AFTER THE AGE OF 19, MOST THAT DO ITS GOING TO BE NEGLIGIBLE ANYWAY. THE POINT IS THAT DOESNT MEAN THAT 1 PERSON CAN'T GROW AN INCH AFTER 19. ACCORDING TO YOUR CHART, ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR EXUM TO BE TALLER THAN 6'2"
The chart shows average growth for their sample population. That means it is normal for a 19 year old of Exum's height to grow 1/5th of an inch. An individual can grow an inch at 19, or nothing at all from 16 upwards. Silesian was a bit, um, optimistic in his projections, but he is essentially correct. I don't see the point you're trying to make at all.
Sorry to pop bubbles, but average growth in 19-20 years is about a quarter inch. Maybe they are counting his 'fro?
The chart shows average growth for their sample population. That means it is normal for a 19 year old of Exum's height to grow 1/5th of an inch. An individual can grow an inch at 19, or nothing at all from 16 upwards. Silesian was a bit, um, optimistic in his projections, but he is essentially correct. I don't see the point you're trying to make at all.
Great use of big words. YOU ARE ENTIRELY MISSING THE POINT. YOUR CHART IS WORTHLESS WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN INDIVIDUAL. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY GROW AFTER THE AGE OF 19, MOST THAT DO ITS GOING TO BE NEGLIGIBLE ANYWAY. THE POINT IS THAT DOESNT MEAN THAT 1 PERSON CAN'T GROW AN INCH AFTER 19. ACCORDING TO YOUR CHART, ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR EXUM TO BE TALLER THAN 6'2"
Growth spurt bishes. 'Nuff said.