MVP
Well-Known Member
After 3 years you will keep saying - but he is only 26, that ceiling is so high!!!!And he's still only 23. Get used to it.
After 3 years you will keep saying - but he is only 26, that ceiling is so high!!!!And he's still only 23. Get used to it.
After 3 years you will keep saying - but he is only 26, that ceiling is so high!!!!
Except that he played great in his minutes this year. His stats were great. If he can simply do the same in more minutes we have a really good player on our hands.We keep talking about his ceiling since he was drafted...getting a bit old.
After 3 years you will keep saying - but he is only 26, that ceiling is so high!!!!
Would not call it great. He showed few flashes of great play with same old moments of "WTF is he doing". His jumpshooting was as bad as when he was drafted. I said I am ok with the contract as I understand why Jazz are giving it but it is a slight overpay and this talk about huge ceiling is becoming annoying. 4 years in the league we should stop talking about ceiling.Except that he played great in his minutes this year. His stats were great. If he can simply do the same in more minutes we have a really good player on our hands.
Forgive my curiosity. Is there a specific terminological or catch phrase related reason for the typo in the title not being fixed yet?
Statistically he was pretty good. He just did it for a short period and not a lot of minutes.Would not call it great. He showed few flashes of great play with same old moments of "WTF is he doing". His jumpshooting was as bad as when he was drafted. I said I am ok with the contract as I understand why Jazz are giving it but it is a slight overpay and this talk about huge ceiling is becoming annoying. 4 years in the league we should stop talking about ceiling.
We should stop talking about flashes when a player has really solid statistical performance. He was flat out performing consistently when he came back from injury. The only flashes were that he wasn't playing a ton of minutes.Would not call it great. He showed few flashes of great play with same old moments of "WTF is he doing". His jumpshooting was as bad as when he was drafted. I said I am ok with the contract as I understand why Jazz are giving it but it is a slight overpay and this talk about huge ceiling is becoming annoying. 4 years in the league we should stop talking about ceiling.
We should stop talking about flashes when a player has really solid statistical performance. He was flat out performing consistently when he came back from injury. The only flashes were that he wasn't playing a ton of minutes.
14 games is too small of the sample but his 3 pt shooting was worst in his career. And despite performing "consistently good" how some of you guys claim he still had mostly negative advanced stats like OBPM, DPBM, BPM and 0.0 in VORP ( which granted is improvement compared to his first and third years)
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/e/exumda01.html
At the end of the day he is what he is - overpaid prospect despite being in the league for 4 years. As I said I have no problem with the Jazz overpaying him as it is sad current reality of NBA today and us being the small market team. Although I personally think smarter move would have been to wait a bit longer to see if there is any interest in him at all from other teams. From what I was reading everywhere else there was no reports of any other team interested in offering him anything. So maybe in 3-4 weeks Jazz could have had him for more realistic value not inflated by "ceiling"
Thank you all.He’s a regular at the Dr and pharmacies. You know, constantly injured and needing those Rx
Side note: Exum is really the only young player we have that could have trade value in a deal for a star, assuming he continues to make strides. It's important to keep him and have him on a long enough deal to maintain as a trade asset.
If he starts breaking out this year, teams that want and need to move a star might take him along with a pick and salary filler. Example: Exum, Thabo, 1st-rd pick for Butler.
If he starts breaking out there's no team that could use him more than we can though... He fits the timeline perfectly...
Maybe @oneye thinks Dante's the perfect drug?
Did you not see that dunk in the Houston series?I have serious doubts about Dante. As simple as I can put it, I don't think dude has the mentality to succeed. He's not lacking the physical makeup or athletic ability, rather I think he's missing it between the ears. I think he will always be sheepish and timid.
Maybe true, but the Jazz would have both options. If the Jazz have Mitchell, Butler and Gobert, plus a bit of cap space, it could attract a 4th piece in free agency and make the Jazz legit contenders.
Sans Butler, the 'Wolves can only muster a minus-4.5 net rating, for which the closest comparison is the season-long efforts of the lottery-bound New York Knicks (minus-4.2). Forced to rely more heavily on Andrew Wiggins' volume-scoring attempts, they descend into mediocrity on offense while completely falling apart on defense. But when this swingman is on the floor, that net rating soars to 8.3, which would leave them behind only the Houston Rockets (8.5) in the overall standings.
Let's put this another way.
When Butler is benched, whether because of injury or head coach Tom Thibodeau letting him rest (hah, as if that would ever happen), Minnesota plays offense like the No. 9 New Orleans Pelicans and defense like a significantly worse version of the No. 30Phoenix Suns. When he plays, the 'Wolves operate better than the No. 1 Golden State Warriors on offense and like the No. 11 Detroit Pistons on defense.