homeytennis
Well-Known Member
How can Quin look the deep bench players in the eye after two horrible performances in a row by the starters?
simply put. no team's gonna win anything with Royce being your second best defender/rebounder on the floor.Royce is so overrated as a perimeter defender.
agree. especially when we are on the second end of the B2B. Jingles clearly ran out of gas towards the end and really shouldn't be on the floor.I really wouldn't mind seeing Paschall get some of Joes minutes to see if a little energy and intensity would help when we get stagnant on defense.
It is simple. We got 2 undersized guards and everyone can shoot over them.Than we got short overrated pf who can score only if he is wide open. Than we got great deff centar ,only what he can do on offense is dunk.Than u got jc who can winn u game but than 3 next game will drag u down badly. Joe got 1 good game than 3 is not exist.What piss me most is tight games when don trying to get on covers and Instagram stories , instead get all team involved and get winn instead hes own glory...On the bright side this team can beat anyone on giving nightI would love is someone knows of a stat that shows how many points above/below their season average opposing guards score against the Jazz. I have lost count over the last few years but undoubtedly lots of guys have had their career or season highs against us.
I think nobody ever claimed that he's garbage. He's was perfect as our 3 pg. I just don't get how he gets to stay healthy now as with us he used to get injured after playing two games in a row.Still think Neto is garbage?
See for me great little man defense is what Mugsy Bogues used to play. It’s what Davion Mitchell plays in Sac Town. Even Chris Paul plays much better D than Conley and Mitchell. If you sag off, are no threat to steal, and can’t get a hand in their face then what good are you? Pop’s adjustment at halftime was to exploit our guard line with the short game, and guess what, it worked!You weren't paying attention then. There was plenty of great defense being played. Unfortunately guys were shooting over our little guys even when they played great defense. The game winning shot from the spurs was defended by rudy as good as he has ever defended anyone before but the dude made and insane shot to win the game. Kind of like the fade away buzzer beater three pointer from way beyond the three point line tonight.
Even worse it was deff specialist buckets o neal lolSee for me great little man defense is what Mugsy Bogues used to play. It’s what Davion Mitchell plays in Sac Town. Even Chris Paul plays much better D than Conley and Mitchell. If you sag off, are no threat to steal, and can’t get a hand in their face then what good are you? Pop’s adjustment at halftime was to exploit our guard line with the short game, and guess what, it worked!
Guards Beal and Neto destroyed us again last night! Dinwiddie can’t beat his own shadow right now. I didn’t see the game, but let me guess, Spida on Beal?
More like Conley and maybe Ingles the way our guards can’t cover their own shadows and one of them isnt
Really??? Wow just wowSee what happens when you change your handle O’Neale? Buckets really? I liked you better when you went by Sticky!
And one of them is a part-timer! Thank you! Glad I’m not the only one that sees it!It is simple. We got 2 undersized guards and everyone can shoot over them.
I wanted to go back to this comment again. This approach is also the same approach that lost four straight games to the Clippers. And three straight games against the Nuggets. And those reasons were on full display the past two nights. I agree with Quin. We’re the same team.
Our only hope is blowing teams out. It’s the only thing that protects us from being in the situations where everything comes unglued. It’s hard to count on blowing out 4/7 games. Even a series against the Grizzlies they were really close in most all the games.
Yep. We can certainly win any given series, but our “moneyball” approach is just saying we’ve gotten unlucky on a couple rolls of the dice and trust the numbers and roll again. The biggest blind spot is not recognizing that we can keep that same formula while making a couple finishing touches around the edges that allow us to adapt in those situations. I think the problem is first acquisition but then implementation, which is on Quin, but I feel Quin would think any adaptation is completing blowing up his moneyball and not truly giving him another roll of the dice.I'm sure they are thinking more along the lines of we can blow out 2 games of a 7 game series, and hopefully eek out 2 more wins in the final 5 games. That's probably reasonable but it's more hope than a plan.
This is exactly my thinking. It doesn't matter what tools you have in your bag if you refuse to use them.Yep. We can certainly win any given series, but our “moneyball” approach is just saying we’ve gotten unlucky on a couple rolls of the dice and trust the numbers and roll again. The biggest blind spot is not recognizing that we can keep that same formula while making a couple finishing touches around the edges that allow us to adapt in those situations. I think the problem is first acquisition but then implementation, which is on Quin, but I feel Quin would think any adaptation is completing blowing up his moneyball and not truly giving him another roll of the dice.
And then there’s Ainge. I’m less confident in Quin’s ability to utilize than I am in Ainge give a couple (even fringe) options.
Oof.