Jack Strop
Well-Known Member
^Favors has been on the trade block every year for at least the past four. Lindsey didn't let Favs' trade value diminish. It was never very high. Favs is NOT an integral part of a contender. Jazz are seen competing in spite of what he offers at the 4, not because of it. It is Favors himself who hasn't wanted to be seen as a 5. But that's where he'd need to play anywhere besides Utah.
I think Lindsey could have gotten something for Millsap. That's it. Kanter had no trade value. Jefferson had no trade value. Boozer had no trade value, unless Utah were to take back bad salaries. In Boozer's case, they couldn't; Jazz had gone into the luxury tax to keep Millsap and needed to get back down. For Jefferson and Millsap, it's a moot point. The cap space was used in the GS/Denver deals. Had DL taken back salaries, the GS deal and picks would have never come our way. And really, that's what Lindsey wanted in exchange for those two. He didn't want any good young players. He wanted future picks so he could tank and get our franchise player with the pick. Mission accomplished: he was able to draft Dante instead of some scrub like Smart or Randle.
I think Lindsey could have gotten something for Millsap. That's it. Kanter had no trade value. Jefferson had no trade value. Boozer had no trade value, unless Utah were to take back bad salaries. In Boozer's case, they couldn't; Jazz had gone into the luxury tax to keep Millsap and needed to get back down. For Jefferson and Millsap, it's a moot point. The cap space was used in the GS/Denver deals. Had DL taken back salaries, the GS deal and picks would have never come our way. And really, that's what Lindsey wanted in exchange for those two. He didn't want any good young players. He wanted future picks so he could tank and get our franchise player with the pick. Mission accomplished: he was able to draft Dante instead of some scrub like Smart or Randle.