It would be way out of character for the Jazz to flip him without giving him the rest of the year to see what we got. I say he sticks for the rest of the year and then he will be a UFA, right? I don't think he is back next year. This seems like a flexibility move as much as a fix the bench move.Chime in on whether you think we keep Clarkson or not ?
Yes. Jazz have reportedly been high on him for years. I doubted that they traded for him just to trade him away the same season.
Who was the guy at last year’s deadline who got traded like 5 times?Too early for this.
Why on earth would we want to keep an athletic guard with some character and a little bit of a knack to put the basketball thru the net?
He gives us a lot of options which is a nice turn of events for any of our not-main players. I think everything is in play but this is definitely a basketball decision for right now.
Assuming an extension for Royce doesn’t materialize (which it shouldn’t, at this point), Clarkson’s expiring gets us under the cap which means the Jazz can offer decent money to good, veteran players looking for a last decent payday relative to other contender that might just have the MLE.
I also think the Jazz may be able to have a conversation about Aaron Gordon, now. For whatever that is worth.
Again, we got options.
Lou Williams has crossed my mind, here.I posted this in another thread, but I knew Clarkson was scoring around 15 ppg but just realized it was in only 23 minutes. I assumed it’d be closer to 30. His points per minute have been pretty high his whole career. Maybe he can be our Lou Williams.
Until the past couple years, he was a volume scorer putting up big numbers on crappy teams. Now everyone is kissing his ***. I’ll go optimistic and hope maybe this can be Clarkson.Lou Williams has crossed my mind, here.