What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

their is har devidenc eof criminially clinton!


have yet to see any credible russia evidence!

notice the e-mails wher enot disputed, people said the wikileaks and all was jsut about the "unlawfull" way of obtaining the,m!

and clinton wa sunder investigation when she destroyed her emails!


trump has ever right to fire comey. especially if after 3 times asked if he was under investigation!
also trump can direct the executive branch any which way he wants within the law. and firing comey is his god dammed right ebstowed upon him by 60+ million people! even the killary clinton people wanted him fired!

Sounds like you dont understand what obstruction of justice is and what allegations are being made, even if he is innocent of everything regarding Russia and anything else there is still very solid evidence of obstruction of justice, which is a serious problem. He does have the right to fire Comey, he does not have the right to obstruct an investigation.
 
He answered that clearly in his testimony today. It was a combination of the strangeness and inappropriateness of Trump's request along with his distrust that Trump would tell the truth about the events at points in the future. Regarding Obama--Comey said he only talked to Obama in private twice (if I recall correctly) and unlike with Trump, neither occasion was inappropriate.

So what if Trump threatened him to shape up or ship out? Maybe Comey got worried over his job an started plotting!

Trump DID NOT fire him for Trump. Again Trump fired him on recommendation from the DOJ! You want the FBI politicized?

Trump should be praised for this Presidential action to PRESERVE the Constitution not crucified! USE YOUR BRAIN!
 
Sounds like you dont understand what obstruction of justice is and what allegations are being made, even if he is innocent of everything regarding Russia and anything else there is still very solid evidence of obstruction of justice, which is a serious problem. He does have the right to fire Comey, he does not have the right to obstruct an investigation.

There is no evidence you are wrong Trumpophobe
 
Trump DID NOT fire him for Trump. Again Trump fired him on recommendation from the DOJ!

Apparently you think Trump is a liar then, because he said he had made up his mind prior to the "recommendation" ("justification" is more accurate) from the DOJ.
 
At the very least it very possible, perhaps even likely that Michael Flynn committed a crime. If/when he is charged will you change your opinion?

what crime do you think they are looking at? Having tea with the British NATO representative?

Look, I don't know Flynn, or even Trump. If charges are filed, there needs to be a trial. In a court, not on CNN.

I've sat through a trial in a court as a juror. I was outvoted, and the judge didn't want to listen to my account of how another juror in the jury room bragged about having a relative working for the defendant, who was found innocent by 11 of the defendant's "peers".

I'll have my opinions. What might change them is information I believe. If such a thing could exist.
 
Apparently you think Trump is a liar then, because he said he had made up his mind prior to the "recommendation" ("justification" is more accurate) from the DOJ.

A lot of people might think Trump is a liar, on occasion and on purpose, when things need a little massaging to get stuff done. Me included.

Anybody who really didn't want Comey fired, for one reason or another, has not been following the news. Hillary would have fired him on Day One.
 
So what if Trump threatened him to shape up or ship out? Maybe Comey got worried over his job an started plotting!

Trump DID NOT fire him for Trump. Again Trump fired him on recommendation from the DOJ! You want the FBI politicized?

Trump should be praised for this Presidential action to PRESERVE the Constitution not crucified! USE YOUR BRAIN!
Lol
 
The President, be it Trump or anyone else, should not have the power to fire the head of our national police force. That power should belong to Congress. The President should only have the power to request that Congress review an appointment and then vote to either reaffirm or remove that person.

My 2 cents
 
what crime do you think they are looking at? Having tea with the British NATO representative?

Look, I don't know Flynn, or even Trump. If charges are filed, there needs to be a trial. In a court, not on CNN.

I've sat through a trial in a court as a juror. I was outvoted, and the judge didn't want to listen to my account of how another juror in the jury room bragged about having a relative working for the defendant, who was found innocent by 11 of the defendant's "peers".

I'll have my opinions. What might change them is information I believe. If such a thing could exist.

Flynn is being investigated for lying to the FBI, both with regards to not disclosing his repeated contacts with Kremlin officials as well as failing to register as a foreign agent, possibly in violation of FARA. I agree about the need for a fair trial should charges be filed. I also support public hearings into these important national security issues as they are in the public's interest to know.
*edited, got hatch and FARA mixed up.*
Sent from my SM-T377V using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
The President, be it Trump or anyone else, should not have the power to fire the head of our national police force. That power should belong to Congress. The President should only have the power to request that Congress review an appointment and then vote to either reaffirm or remove that person.

My 2 cents

There is no Constitutional provision for national police or intelligence agencies. Probably could be a good idea, but the Founders wanted the States to have all the marbles so far as possible. They were having a hard time convincing the states to sign up.... they made all kinds of promises.

The general principle of separation of powers does solidly support your notion, alt. Nobody should be above the law... well, there is an issue about Congressional ethics and all the money being bandied about by Lobbyists, revolving-door regulators/regulated Corporate bigshots, and such.

The issue the Founders were grappling with was just this: How to create a government that would not become corrupt and abusive like the British colonial governments run by British carpetbaggers....schills for the British Corporates of the time.

Comey has a long career with both parties of playing the political games, working the ropes so to speak. He is absolutely unfit for public office, I don't care who fired him, it had to be done.

I think Trump was afraid to fire him, looking for some kind of cover, unsure he could pull it off without it being used as it has been against him. Trump knew Comey was a playa, and it shows tremendous courage on Trump's part that he did it.

J. Edgar Hoover had the dirt on all the politicians in his time, too. I remember watching TV drama stuff that made him out like Jesus the Crucified, the one who saves us all from all crooks.

I don't know how you can ever have national police organizations that cannot be weaponized politically.....

Our only real hope is to vote the bums out more regularly, making it an issue when candidates have corporate and/or banker backers. And never voting for anyone with big ideas about how to run the world.....

But yes, make the FBI chief term-limited to two years and nominated by congress, approved by the Senate, signed off on by the President..... and answerable to a oversight committee comprised of nominees proposed by a national Sheriff's organization which must be approved by a national board of boy scout civic badge holders, twelve selected by lottery.....

Like I said, I don't know how you could EVER have a non-politicized national police force.....
 
Sounds like you dont understand what obstruction of justice is and what allegations are being made, even if he is innocent of everything regarding Russia and anything else there is still very solid evidence of obstruction of justice, which is a serious problem. He does have the right to fire Comey, he does not have the right to obstruct an investigation.

for obstruction of justice their needs to be a crime!

trump has every right to fire comey!

he is the boss!!!!

seriously how can he obstruct justice if by law he has the right!
he wa snot being investigated! even if others are investigated he could pardon them.

he has every right to fire everyone who works for him.


laws/constitution needs to change if you do not like that
 
The President, be it Trump or anyone else, should not have the power to fire the head of our national police force. That power should belong to Congress. The President should only have the power to request that Congress review an appointment and then vote to either reaffirm or remove that person.

My 2 cents

ye sbut for now trump did nothing wrong when it came to firing comey.

laws/regulations and constitution needs to change for that
 
Flynn is being investigated for lying to the FBI, both with regards to not disclosing his repeated contacts with Kremlin officials as well as failing to register as a foreign agent, possibly in violation of the hatch act.

I agree about the need for a fair trial should charges be filed. I also support public hearings into these important national security issues as they are in the public's interest to know.

Sent from my SM-T377V using JazzFanz mobile app

I think you are accurate on those charges. So what was the impact of those falsifications, in real terms? Did we give the Russians control of 20% of our Uranium resources? What did he tell the Russians he met, and what did they promise him? What was the deal?

All that would necessarily be discovered in making appropriate charges and arriving at a verdict and a punishment. Lying is bad. Lying to law enforcement is a law written into the police codebooks of offenses. It's always the first thing the cop writes down. I've questioned how laws against lying to the police or law enforcement can stand up to the right to not incriminate yourself. So was there some rationale behind say, a Flynn "lie", like oh a conversation about the Jazz basketball team is not the kind of thing you're required to disclose. If it was a discussion with formulas and equations about our composite aircraft materials essential to evade radar detection, I'd say nail Flynn's hide to the walls of Leavenworth.

oh, wait.... didn't Bill Clinton share a lot of space and computer technology with the Chinese, to help them assume their rightful place in the world as a co-equal in the family of nations? And to help them aim their nukes at us?

Let me make it clear. It just doesn't strike me as "American" to have a partisan media that will bury serious issues about some preferred politicians while grabbing every possible chance to attack another.

Oh, wait. I remember reading in History about the Tammany Hall scandals..... we've been doing this partisan media thing for a helluvalongtime.
 
The President, be it Trump or anyone else, should not have the power to fire the head of our national police force. That power should belong to Congress. The President should only have the power to request that Congress review an appointment and then vote to either reaffirm or remove that person.

My 2 cents

You are correct but live in the reality environment you are dealt. Trump had the right just like state governors have this same right an they ALL force agendas down are throats with the power of there BAN HAMMER!

Change the rules if you got a problem with this. Go ahead if you want a divided isle congress deciding who should be in charge of the Judicial Branch. Good luck with that so called balancing of power.
 
I think you are accurate on those charges. So what was the impact of those falsifications, in real terms? Did we give the Russians control of 20% of our Uranium resources? What did he tell the Russians he met, and what did they promise him? What was the deal?

All that would necessarily be discovered in making appropriate charges and arriving at a verdict and a punishment. Lying is bad. Lying to law enforcement is a law written into the police codebooks of offenses. It's always the first thing the cop writes down. I've questioned how laws against lying to the police or law enforcement can stand up to the right to not incriminate yourself. So was there some rationale behind say, a Flynn "lie", like oh a conversation about the Jazz basketball team is not the kind of thing you're required to disclose. If it was a discussion with formulas and equations about our composite aircraft materials essential to evade radar detection, I'd say nail Flynn's hide to the walls of Leavenworth.

oh, wait.... didn't Bill Clinton share a lot of space and computer technology with the Chinese, to help them assume their rightful place in the world as a co-equal in the family of nations? And to help them aim their nukes at us?

Let me make it clear. It just doesn't strike me as "American" to have a partisan media that will bury serious issues about some preferred politicians while grabbing every possible chance to attack another.

Oh, wait. I remember reading in History about the Tammany Hall scandals..... we've been doing this partisan media thing for a helluvalongtime.

Well I think it's fairly obvious that finding the answers to your concerns is why we have the congressional investigations, as well as the fbi's and Muellers investigations.

Consider that Michael Flynn ****ed up right away and was only NSA for a few weeks. He did still manage to put the kibosh on an isis strike using Kurdish troops during the transition. A move favored by Turkey, by whom he had been paid as a foreign agent, and then lied about. Other real life impacts are hard to quantify because he was forced out of his position within a few weeks.

And spare me the "medias not fair" whining. The Benghazi hearings weren't that long ago and that **** was covered for years.

Sent from my SM-G935V using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Oh, and Michael Flynn could be innocent as a baby angel and that wouldn't make a lick of difference as to whether the Presidents actions with Comey rise to the level of obstruction of justice.

Sent from my SM-G935V using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I'd love for Donald cheerleaders to go just a few hours without mentioning Clinton. Isn't it unbelievable how they try and justify Dump by bringing up some obscure and unrelated Clinton covfefe? Cmon repubs, stop with the nothing burgers and look at yourselves. Take accountability for the terrible candidate.
 
Back
Top