Carter?Given that the most obviously, traditionally, moral president we've had in 50 years lost his reelection campaign, you're absolutely right.
Carter?Given that the most obviously, traditionally, moral president we've had in 50 years lost his reelection campaign, you're absolutely right.
There were a number of allegations about Clinton prior to 1992 when he was elected the first time, but, as I recall, none of them were proven until Lewinski. (It was actually during a trial on one of them, the Paula Jones case, that he denied having sex with Lewinski.)Clinton was re-elected on 1996 but it didn’t become publicly known that he was having an affair with Lewinksy until 1998. I think time and context matter here. Had Clinton run for re-election in 1998, he might not have been re-elected because of the Lewinsky affair. Trump was elected despite the access Hollywood “grab em by the *****” tape and faced no real accountability until now over Stormy.
It’s not like Stormy was Trump’s only transgression. Comparing the two, Trump to Clinton, is again, just dumb both sidesizingism that helps no one. I think one could argue that Trump’s evangelical “family values” coalition has demonstrated an incredible amount of hypocrisy. They harped from 1998-2016 about the importance of values. Why did that suddenly change?
Yup. Remember him saying his moral failing was that he had "lusted in his heart?" And the thing was, we all believe that was the worst thing he did, and, in retrospect, it probably was.Carter?
My parents were huge fans. They said he couldn't win because he was too honest.Yup. Remember him saying his moral failing was that he had "lusted in his heart?" And the thing was, we all believe that was the worst thing he did, and, in retrospect, it probably was.
Green text is sarcasm. He didn't mean what he was saying, he was illustrating a position that you can mention a person repeatedly without judging them on their oppressed identities (that those people who mention Soros constantly are necessarily being anti-Semitic in doing so). I don't endorse his position, but I understand the point.I genuinely don't get this reference. Was this a jab at @One Brow? Are you insinuating that he's homophobic? Why?
More to the counter-point, you also rail about heterosexual conservatives with equal vehemence.Or are you talking about me? I'm not homophobic. I don't like Peter Thiel because he supports illiberal causes and tries to get sociopaths like this elected. Did you see this ad?
My opinions are formed based on the illiberal policies and candidates they support; not on their sexual orientation or race. Meanwhile, Fox News has no problem fanning the flames of anti-semitic conspiracy that we’ve seen since the early 1900s. And Blake Masters was an illiberal sociopath. Did you see his ad and follow his campaign?Green text is sarcasm. He didn't mean what he was saying, he was illustrating a position that you can mention a person repeatedly without judging them on their oppressed identities (that those people who mention Soros constantly are necessarily being anti-Semitic in doing so). I don't endorse his position, but I understand the point.
More to the counter-point, you also rail about heterosexual conservatives with equal vehemence.
As I’ve been saying, Trump gives permission for people to behave their worst:See my post 1,215 on this. Because logically, you’re right about this. If you value honesty and fidelity then how can you excuse this?
Trump gives permission freedom to think and act their worst. People empowered by this don't think negatively that Trump is blackmailing the president of Ukraine, pledging allegiance to Jan 6ers, or paying off porn stars that he's slept with. If anything, it's empowering because he's as rotten as they fantasize. There's power in being free to act your worst.
As I’ve been saying, Trump gives permission for people to behave their worst:
View: https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1641781177626312710?s=46&t=QT7YFlZ_IlHq81PpZAhKgw
View attachment 14159
Trump is no different than any other “con job
“, grifter, get rich scheme or sales pitch. It’s a cocktail of persuasion, confidence and mixed with human nature.
Dumb people or smart people can be persuaded. Here is a book that talks about this more.
A few points from the book about persuasion:
Reciprocity – We feel obligated to give back to those who first give to us. When someone does us a favor we want to return the favor in some way and silly as it may sound. You look at J6 and you can see that many people wanted to stick up for Trump because he stood up for them. (Their thought process)
View: https://youtu.be/qjHGZAzlIbU
Liking – People like to do business with people they like, especially those who are similar to them.
View: https://youtu.be/iXZ_ZmFKdgY
Unity – Unity says it’s easier for us to say Yes to people who are of us; those with whom we have a shared identity. This is why talking about a National Divorce is a crazy and terrible idea. There would be divorce after divorce until we were dissolved.
View: https://youtu.be/RU_IJB0jGBo
Consensus – We feel more comfortable doing what everyone else is doing or doing whatever people just like us are doing.
View: https://youtu.be/QppC_JIQ_0Y
Authority – People tend to trust those who are viewed as experts. This reminds me of a Chappelle clip.
View: https://youtu.be/nWfQCDaAa6s
https://youtu.be/T2z8App14bs
Scarcity – People want more of what they cannot have or something that’s hard to come by. There is only 1 Trump. Here is a clip from Bill Maher about this:
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.youtu.be
All these techniques are not just used in Politics but in Business, Relationships or Religion.
But the fact that I cannot understand how anyone could have even fallen for such a con job as Trump pulled, tells me that there has to be something about such people that I actually NEED to understand. And I think that requires diving deep into human nature, and other things beneath the surface.
Yeah, I’m thinking the emphasis in what I said was “other things beneath the surface”. I was not aware of the study below, do not know it’s merits, it is recent. But, in general, this is likely where I was going. I’m looking for reasons for different ways of seeing the world in general, that might be there, regardless if I was raised in urban Boston, or rural Texas. I had googled “biological and psychological differences between liberals and conservatives”, and a wealth of returns, because this is nothing new. I have never dived as deeply into this area as I sensed would be fruitful, where fruitful=two sides recognizing their shared humanity/erosion of extreme partisanship.Trump is no different than any other “con job
“, grifter, get rich scheme or sales pitch. It’s a cocktail of persuasion, confidence and mixed with human nature.
Now the judge is corrupt. I bet Soros paid the judge too.
View attachment 14176
Now the secret service is corrupt. They’re all anti trump. Bought off by Jewish billionaires and indoctrinated by woke ideology and afraid of BLM and CRT. Probably groomed too. They all hate Trump! Man does Donald have the worst luck.
View: https://twitter.com/bretbaier/status/1642858674652696576?s=46&t=QT7YFlZ_IlHq81PpZAhKgw
Donald will be unfairly charged this week. Another man 2,000 years ago was unfairly charged this week too. Is Donald greater than Jesus? What’s a greater sacrifice? Die for the sins of mankind or be prosecuted for ownin the libs?Anyone who thinks Donald ever did anything wrong is obviously corrupt. Duh. I mean they are railing against the only perfect being that ever lived. Jesus should be honored that he gets compared to the Donald.
I think @Jason needs to add the skull emoji because I'm dead.Donald will be unfairly charged this week. Another man 2,000 years ago was unfairly charged this week too. Is Donald greater than Jesus? What’s a greater sacrifice? Die for the sins of mankind or be prosecuted for ownin the libs?