What's new
By:

Don't Ask, Don't Tell is officially history!!

One Brow said:
Your decision of what the purpose of genitals, or a colon, or any other body part is as much a declaration of faith as any preacher proclaiming inerrancy for a scriptural work. There is no purpose marker, measure, or codifier. When two or three people see a different purpose to the same event, there is no way to objectively verify who is right and who is wrong.

By the way, there are far more species of living things that separate the transfer of genetic material from reproduction that have them in the same act. So, any claim the primary purpose of sex is reproduction needs to surmount that hurdle.
Click to expand...

Seriously did you take biology in school? Do you understand the nature of the development of biological structures in living organisms? The function of body parts is a declaration of faith? And what exactly does the sentence in bold above mean? Seriously, biology and english are not your strong suits are they?
 
DutchJazzer said:
THIS is the mother of all post

/thread

gayness sucks:P

okay on to some serious business f it's genetics. means a homosexual is defect. something that is defect is WEAK. if it is choice that said person is also weak going against nature, when something isn't doing what its supposed to do it is weak.

dont know how to restate this in other words. homosexuals, transgenders bisexuals, lesbians, asexuals, omnisexuals or whatever they wanna be called these days are weak(or defective or whatever you wanna call it).

to restate it incase you dont understand. a gun that does what it's supposed to do. now thats a gun i'm willing to risk my life with go to war with. would you go to war with a deffective gun?

on a side note hot lesbians rule :D.
Click to expand...

It doesn't get much more offensive than this.:rolleyes:
 
Katie, I think you're coming to the wrong place if you're looking for any sort of enlightened though.
 
KatieMCR said:
It doesn't get much more offensive than this.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

i'm sorry if i offended you. but if nature intended for 2 men to get in love and have sex wouldn't nature or evolution provide a way for them to reproduce?
so the way i see it its a defect if its genetics. if its a choice i see it as a defect in that persons way of thinking.

i'm sorry if i offended you, just trying to be honest. hope i dont get an infraction for offending you. cus being offensive gets people infractions.

if i get one see you guys in 7 days.
 
KatieMCR said:
It doesn't get much more offensive than this.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

That's true, but in Dutch's defense, he seems a little more ignorant than malicious, on the ignorance/maliciousness scale... But who knows. I seem to recall him one time saying that the Jews...what was it? Killed JFK, I think...
 
DutchJazzer said:
i'm sorry if i offended you. but if nature intended for 2 men to get in love and have sex wouldn't nature or evolution provide a way for them to reproduce?
so the way i see it its a defect if its genetics. if its a choice i see it as a defect in that persons way of thinking.

i'm sorry if i offended you, just trying to be honest. hope i dont get an infraction for offending you. cus being offensive gets people infractions.

if i get one see you guys in 7 days.
Click to expand...

Way to play both sides of the fence Dutch. According to you, being gay is not a choice, one's born that way. In essence, isn't that "nature" determining their "gayness." Having said that, didn't nature therefore intend for them to be gay, knowing full well they would not be able to reproduce? Or did God or Mother Nature or nature or whatever term you want to use just not think things through and determine the sexual path for the offspring without realizing in advance that they wouldn't be able to reproduce with one another?

Oh wait, I'm sorry. I see now. It's a defect. Bro, sorry but I see you as the one with the defect.

And oh yeah, since you've failed to respond to my earlier post, since I can only assume you don't have any intelligent answer, let me tell you that every single site I saw said that homosexuals, either gay men or lesbians, in studies, have shown to have higher iq's than heterosexuals or bi-sexuals. They've also been shown to have higher average salaries than heterosexuals. But yeah, us heterosexuals are the strong-minded ones.

<awaiting obvious reply about willpower, discipline, and impulse control>

Dutch, by chance did you too try out for the role Chris Cooper won for the film American Beauty?
 
KrazeeEyezKilla said:
Way to play both sides of the fence Dutch. According to you, being gay is not a choice, one's born that way. In essence, isn't that "nature" determining their "gayness." Having said that, didn't nature therefore intend for them to be gay, knowing full well they would not be able to reproduce? Or did God or Mother Nature or nature or whatever term you want to use just not think things through and determine the sexual path for the offspring without realizing in advance that they wouldn't be able to reproduce with one another?

Oh wait, I'm sorry. I see now. It's a defect. Bro, sorry but I see you as the one with the defect.

And oh yeah, since you've failed to respond to my earlier post, since I can only assume you don't have any intelligent answer, let me tell you that every single site I saw said that homosexuals, either gay men or lesbians, in studies, have shown to have higher iq's than heterosexuals or bi-sexuals. They've also been shown to have higher average salaries than heterosexuals. But yeah, us heterosexuals are the strong-minded ones.

<awaiting obvious reply about willpower, discipline, and impulse control>

Dutch, by chance did you too try out for the role Chris Cooper won for the film American Beauty?
Click to expand...


just saying whetter we go with homosexuality is a choice. that said person is weak. wether we go with the argument thats genetic. that said person is also weak cus its a genetic defect.

i still believe that being gay is a choice and not genetics
 
DutchJazzer said:
just saying whetter we go with homosexuality is a choice. that said person is weak. wether we go with the argument thats genetic. that said person is also weak cus its a genetic defect.

i still believe that being gay is a choice and not genetics
Click to expand...

So following that same logic, you're simply choosing to be a moran?
 
Running with your train of thought, what then should gays do to make the right choice?

Lie to a partner of the opposite sex and pretend to be someone they're not? What happens, with males at least, when they can't pitch a tent because, well, they're not genetically built to be attracted to someone of the opposite sex? Grab a candle off the bedside table and pretend?
 
KrazeeEyezKilla said:
Running with your train of thought, what then should gays do to make the right choice?

Lie to a partner of the opposite sex and pretend to be someone they're not? What happens, with males at least, when they can't pitch a tent because, well, they're not genetically built to be attracted to someone of the opposite sex? Grab a candle off the bedside table and pretend?
Click to expand...

simple

survival of the fittest. either those gays should become strong or. be like darwin let them become endangered species
 
nothing wrong with survival of the fittest society has gone soft. thats why the earth is oevrcrowded.

in nature lions come to eat the weak the strong can and will run away. leaving the weak behind to die.
 
DutchJazzer said:
simple

survival of the fittest. either those gays should become strong or. be like darwin let them become endangered species
Click to expand...

Darwin doesn't apply. Homosexuals aren't a species. Plus.... whole can of worms. Not going to go there. But you're off base. Bro.
 
to answer your qeustion they should do nothing.
they can choose to be homosexuals. they van choose whatever but dont expect me to fight side by side with them
 
Stickler said:
Darwin doesn't apply. Homosexuals aren't a species. Plus.... whole can of worms. Not going to go there. But you're off base. Bro.
Click to expand...

so how about the theory that in nature lets say a pack of wildebeast is attacked by lions. the weakest/handicapped wildebeast will become the prey. will end on the lions dinner table right?


survival of the fitest darwin theory can be aplied to a subspecies(if we asume that being gay is genetics)
 
DutchJazzer said:
to answer your qeustion they should do nothing.
they can choose to be homosexuals. they van choose whatever but dont expect me to fight side by side with them
Click to expand...

exactly. if you had simply said this all along, nobody would have questioned you.

they choose, and the rest of us, as human beings, should be tolerant and i would take it a step further and say supportive of their quest for what is nothing more than true happiness. after all, isn't that what we all want in life?
 
This hole just keeps getting deeper.

digging-a-hole.jpg
 
This message is to Dutch. I just received your neg rep. Yes, I know you can't prove it. There is no need to say, "I can't prove it." That is all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top