What's new

Down with cj

Tell me where the "I told you so" or the hate is in that?

Like I said, My bad.

You are obviously no relation to the logrrad who used to yap yap yap about how he saw nothing in CJ, and those of us who did were wrong.

Please forgive me for making that mistake. You are obviously much smarter than Logcrap69 when it comes to rookies taken in the 2nd round.


My bad.
 
Go find a post and post it then. Easy to put words in peoples mouths. I have had the same position on him since we re-signed him. Post/pic/link or it didn't happen.
 
Go find a post and post it then. Easy to put words in peoples mouths. I have had the same position on him since we re-signed him. Post/pic/link or it didn't happen.

I can't. Obviously I already admitted that logcrap69 and lograddderp are different posters who never existed.

That was the old daze. You are right, and I am wrong.\\


What else do you want?
 
I can't. Obviously I already admitted that logcrap69 and lograddderp are different posters who never existed.

That was the old daze. You are right, and I am wrong.\\


What else do you want?

Whatever form of back-pedal works for you I guess.


Peace.
 
CJ is the man. We'd be boned without him, and I'm dead serious about that. He's our only player who has the athleticism and skill and most importantly height to break down the defense and score anytime. He adds a totally different dynamic to the system and is the closest thing we have to a Hornacek.

Maybe Hayward and Evans will do it eventually, but the jury is still out.
 
Cj played good and hes usually always the sub of the game for a reason. He's our best player on the bench.
 
Being a new poster who has read the posts for awhile, I'm kinda confused by the CJ threads. First he was junk, then he was the second coming of Adrian Dantley, and now he sucks again. Sounds a little schitzo ....

Confused by those confused over the different reactions to a player's performance in what are, after all, different games. Players aren't always great. Or, thankfully, they're not always crap.

And at some point you ought to get used to exaggerations -- a lot of hyperbole in sports, and is to be expected from fanatics who bother to post online.
 
Last edited:
Funny how when CJ is part of a larger losing effort the argument is "everyone sucked" and when he just does poorly the argument is "everyone has a bad game". And his good games are just too far apart.

I have seen enough bad games from him, time to find out what Hayward can do.

He played 9 whole minutes that game. He must be the whole reason they lost.
 
CJ had a nice game tonight, at least from the box score (working game nights sucks). 6 of 11 is good. 4 TO is not great, but he filled up the stat line other than that pretty nicely.

At least 2 of those were offensive fouls while attacking the basket. I'll take those kind of turnovers by a player anytime. One of those was called a block and the other ref overturned it. Though it did look like one of them was an offensive foul the 2nd one looked like the player was still sliding over and CJ barely hit him(of course Brad Miller fell down like it was shaq hitting him though). Either way getting fouls while attacking the basket and forcing the refs to make that call is not necessarily a bad play.
 
He played 9 whole minutes that game. He must be the whole reason they lost.

Didn't say that, and I was not talking about any specific game, that is just the general response of the die-hard apologists.
 
At least 2 of those were offensive fouls while attacking the basket. I'll take those kind of turnovers by a player anytime. One of those was called a block and the other ref overturned it. Though it did look like one of them was an offensive foul the 2nd one looked like the player was still sliding over and CJ barely hit him(of course Brad Miller fell down like it was shaq hitting him though). Either way getting fouls while attacking the basket and forcing the refs to make that call is not necessarily a bad play.

Agreed.
 
Back
Top