LoPo
Well-Known Member
This is a very accurate post, but here's why I think losing Hayward is a big deal for the Jazz:
Lindsay and this organization are really pushing the narrative that Utah doesn't need to apologize for being Utah when it comes to Free Agent recruiting. They're trying to implement a swagger that basically says "We're one of the most solid franchises in the NBA, we have title aspirations, and we are located in a city that actually has plenty of perks regardless of what type of lifestyle you're looking to live".
Problem is, it gets much harder to sell that idea when you can't hang on to one of your own. I think it's very important for the Jazz to be able to hold onto a guy that they've drafted, developed, and invested A TON of time and resources into. This is a franchise that have had multiple players refuse to come and play for AFTER they've already been traded for. It's a franchise that didn't dare wait for a decision from Deron Williams because they knew he was going to walk. It's a franchise that's never had a superstar player actually choose to come play for. Getting Hayward to choose Utah is a huge victory on several fronts.
Very good post. It would really suck to lose him. I hope he stays, but we will see. JM12 - how bold would you get during the draft? Would you consider trading Hood or even Favors?