Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
You're quite the ****, aren't you?
My apologies to both of you.He based it on 200 or more wins and a higher than 50% winning percentage. One of the more successful paths was the player straight to coach path.
stats > your opinion
Just realized we are arguing different things here. The table I posted in the coaching search thread is not completely applicable. I looked at the winningest coaches in NBA history, but not winning %, which is a key part of Locke's analysis. What my table DOES show is that a coach with NO NBA experience has almost an equal chance of success. And even with pro basketball experience, it's often just a rotational player or scrub who succeeds over a HOF'er. Some of the ex-players on the list were assistants or had other coaching experience after their playing days, some did not.
The takeaway I get from Locke, is yes, it can be a successful route. But that road is littered with the bodies of many ex-players who didn't make the jump successfully. I'd rather see a guy come in who has a history of success and a wealth of experience.