What's new

Eating Processed Meat Causes Cancer

The Midnight

#Baby_Talk
Contributor
Says the World Health Organisation...

https://money.cnn.com/2015/10/26/news/red-meat-processed-cancer-world-health-organization/

The WHO's cancer research unit now classifies processed meat as "carcinogenic to humans" based on evidence from hundreds of studies, and linked it specifically to colon, or colorectal, cancer.

The report outlined that simply eating 50 grams of processed meat each day -- the equivalent of two slices of ham -- can increase the risk of such cancer by 18%. However, the authors say the risks are relatively small to begin with.

The organization defines processed meat as any type of meat that is salted, cured or smoked to enhance its flavor or preserve it. Processed meat generally contains pork or beef, but may also contain poultry.

The WHO now classifies processed meat in the same category as smoking and asbestos, based on its certainty of a link with cancer, but stressed that did not mean they were equally dangerous.

Unprocessed red meat such as steak and lamb shanks is classified as "probably carcinogenic."


You are what you eat!!!
 
I'm going full dull.

No alcohol.
And straight up ONLY healthy as **** food.
And no cussing.
 
I've been hearing about this for a while now. It's not like the WHO is ahead of the science on the topic. This is not what the WHO "says", it's what the evidence says and they have acknowledged/recognized.
 
I've been hearing about this for a while now. It's not like the WHO is ahead of the science on the topic. This is not what the WHO "says", it's what the evidence says and they have acknowledged/recognized.

the-who.jpg
 
I've been hearing about this for a while now. It's not like the WHO is ahead of the science on the topic. This is not what the WHO "says", it's what the evidence says and they have acknowledged/recognized.

Even then, it's kind of a misstatement to say these types of meats "cause" cancer. Contents of said meats have elements in them which raises the risk of developing cancerous cells. A bit semantic, but it would better describe this study since reading comments on this study in other places are pretty derisive toward the study.

These meats don't "cause" cancer. They raise your cancer risk.
 
Even then, it's kind of a misstatement to say these types of meats "cause" cancer. Contents of said meats have elements in them which raises the risk of developing cancerous cells. A bit semantic, but it would better describe this study since reading comments on this study in other places are pretty derisive toward the study.

These meats don't "cause" cancer. They raise your cancer risk.

I suppose that depends on whether you allow the word "cause" to refer to a partial effect. If a phenomenon can have multiple causes, then it is proper to say that processed meats are a contributing cause to some cancers.
 
Old age also causes cancer. Who cares? One of the food scientists also said this report shouldn't be used for scare mongering. ****, everything these days causes cancer.
 
Your risk of colon cancer is 5%. Raising 5% by 18% makes your risk of getting colon cancer something like 5.89%.


OH NO!!!!!!!

Pass the bacon please.

******** article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Your risk of colon cancer is 5%. Raising 5% by 18% makes your risk of getting colon cancer something like 5.89%.


OH NO!!!!!!!

Pass the bacon please.

******** article.

2 slices of bacon will raise it by 18%. 6 slices of bacon, a large steak, and 2 burgers a day will increase it by what %, and what will the resulting cancer risk be then?
 
2 slices of bacon will raise it by 18%. 6 slices of bacon, a large steak, and 2 burgers a day will increase it by what %, and what will the resulting cancer risk be then?

I dunno. 6%?

Let's be honest here. We are talking about colon cancer. They type of cancer that a yearly checkup and a couple polyp snips cure.

This is blatant making something out of nothing journalism.
 
A while ago I read what I thought was a pretty convincing study about colon cancer. According to the study people who have a colon are much more likely to develop colon cancer. In fact a colonless person has never been diagnosed with colon cancer.
 
A while ago I read what I thought was a pretty convincing study about colon cancer. According to the study people who have a colon are much more likely to develop colon cancer. In fact a colonless person has never been diagnosed with colon cancer.

If we just eliminate colons and old age, cancer will drop by approximately 95%. Get to work society.
 
If we just eliminate colons and old age, cancer will drop by approximately 95%. Get to work society.

LOL!!! This reminds me of a humorous birthday card I have. It shows a drawing of an old geezer playing Wheel of Fortune and saying to Pat Sajak "I'd like to buy a bowel."
Inside it makes some quip about getting older...

cracks me up even now, just thinking about it!
 
If we just eliminate colons and old age, cancer will drop by approximately 95%. Get to work society.

Actually, the problem seems to be long life as opposed to old age, if I recall the studies on mice where genes that cause aging were deactivated.
 
Back
Top