You are wrong if youthink that I am playing the denier card.
I openly write that those acts would qualify as one kind of an int'l crime, genocide or else.
Dude, believe me I am a professor of int'l law.
Lemkin's personal motives are well known to me.
For me he is a very valuable lawyer and pure admiration.
But his writings are not law; 1948 Genocide Convention is, which is, needless to say, to be interpreted according to Vienna onvention of Treaties; NOT Lemkin's personal agenda (tho he coined the term genoicde).
I do stop here as well, for I see that my already-badly-put remarks are falling on deaf ears.
I guess I should make 1-2 corrections and hopefully done with this thread:
In parallel to what happened to Armenians, there were similar events happening to Greeks and Assyrians spanning the peak intensity at around 1910-1925. Todays remaining Assyrians in Turkey are mainly living in South Eastern part of Turkey. Later on, there were comparable events in 1935-1938 in Dersim and again to remaining Greeks in 1960s in Istanbul I believe. The timeline continues today with Kurds.
What you wrote in your previous message implying both Armenians and Turks killed each other is one of the popular argument done by the Turkish nationalists (or Kemalists) to trim/blur the events and prepare a basis for the denial, I thought you were trying to throw this card to the table.
On Kanter: I guess he was supposed to be the main subject, if he preferes not to play than it is his decision and he does not have to have any explanation to NT or whoever.
I am mainly a jazz fan because of Karl Malone. I used to watch his games and he was my hero when I was a kid. His games were a must watch for me together with the muppet show on TV. I should admit I don't enjoy Jazz that much anymore but players like Favors, who is becoming a favorite of mine, still remind me of Malone.