What's new
By:

ESPN Player Rankings - Jazz Players

No recent Jazz players but DeMarre Carroll sure made a big jump from last year to this year.

From 302 to 189. 113 spots.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];908126 said:
should be on the team. the decision to not bring him back still baffles teh **** outta me
Click to expand...

Oh I agree. That was something I didn't like about last year. I'd have kept Millsap personally but I understood not resigning him. I didn't under stand the Carroll decision at all.
 
Why is it crazy? He was not even a starter on one of the worst teams in the NBA. I am not saying he should be 162, but it is perfectly reasonable to have him this low.
 
stitches said:
Why is it crazy? He was not even a starter on one of the worst teams in the NBA. I am not saying he should be 162, but it is perfectly reasonable to have him this low.
Click to expand...

Corbin strikes again
 
stitches said:
Why is it crazy? He was not even a starter on one of the worst teams in the NBA. I am not saying he should be 162, but it is perfectly reasonable to have him this low.
Click to expand...

It's pretty ****ing cray. I don't even like Burks that much, but he should at least be around #100.
 
stitches said:
Why is it crazy? He was not even a starter on one of the worst teams in the NBA. I am not saying he should be 162, but it is perfectly reasonable to have him this low.
Click to expand...

I disagree. He is easily top 25 at getting to the line alone. That would mean the rest of his game is just dreadful which it is not.
 
Dante Exum is about as good as Burks! Those rankings are a steaming pile of ****.
 
I don't know 162 puts him as a borderline starter in the league. That seems about right for him. Now if he can prove to be more than NBA starter then you might be able to say
something different but right now it's just potential
 
Myjazz said:
I don't know 162 puts him as a borderline starter in the league. That seems about right for him. Now if he can prove to be more than NBA starter then you might be able to say
something different but right now it's just potential
Click to expand...

For guys who played over 1000 minutes (about 12 minutes a game) Alec Burks is:
- 63rd in Points Scored
- 85th in Assists
- 50th in Points Per 100 Possessions
- 13th in Free Throw Attempts Per 100 Possessions
- 98th in PER
- 113th in True Shooting %
- 85th in Assist %
- 98th in Steal %

It really doesn't matter but 162 seems at least 40-50 spots too low.
 
Myjazz said:
I don't know 162 puts him as a borderline starter in the league. That seems about right for him. Now if he can prove to be more than NBA starter then you might be able to say
something different but right now it's just potential
Click to expand...

Way to reinforce the misguided thought that being a starter is the only way to be considered a good player.
 
MDAV28 said:
For guys who played over 1000 minutes (about 12 minutes a game) Alec Burks is:
- 63rd in Points Scored
- 85th in Assists
- 50th in Points Per 100 Possessions
- 13th in Free Throw Attempts Per 100 Possessions
- 98th in PER
- 113th in True Shooting %
- 85th in Assist %
- 98th in Steal %

It really doesn't matter but 162 seems at least 40-50 spots too low.
Click to expand...

Well I guess there are 40-50 players who established their reputations by playing defense ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top