What's new

Favs Deal Must Be Moved

Yeah I don't want to talk in circles... I get the penalty is on him... but he will do things that could hurt the on court to skirt the penalty (which is likely the outcome) and that is why fans care and pay attention to this stuff... just explaining the rationale. Very few owners spend into eternal tax and those owners are usually the title favorites or they were like the Warriors last year (guessing they'd like a refund on the Oubre deal).

I think he trusted that DL had a handle on things. Likely knew a tax bill was coming but that it wasn't going to be out of hand. Ryan can't micromanage everything... so you trust competent help. DL was either negligent, ignorant, or lazy with regard to his cap management. I think its part of the reason he's no longer in charge. The Tucker move was inconsistent... not sure they messed up the math... or knew the math and then decided to give themselves a shot at ducking the tax even though they knew it was likely impossible. The Tucker deal makes no sense unless you thought you were inching closer to ducking the tax. Call it whatever you like... the ****ed up and I feel like I was proven right since he got his walking papers (after the team was really successful nonetheless).

I think they will try to move money around the margins and jump on a deal to get off Favs salary with the pick as the incentive. I don't agree that it means Conley is gone... I think he gets a fair offer either way. I think if he comes back you don't use the taxpayer MLE unless something amazing comes around... and if it does I think you move Bogey or JC for a lower salaried player.

The Tucker deal showed gross incompotence and while I get what you're saying about feeling validated with DL's ousting, the guy who was running day to day and most of the FO is still here. Everyone in that FO who let it happen should be ashamed because messing up the numbers is not a one man job.

If I were running things, I'd try to move off of Bogey and Clarkson for younger and cheaper cost controlled players or draft picks. We had a two year window to compete, we failed, so now it's time to restructure as the focus should be DM's next contract. I just don't see us doing that, however, and it's also difficult to find those moves because the draft is before free agency. Teams that would want those players are looking to win now and probably have higher hopes for their space. Favors would be a salary dump situation to a bad team so it's much more realistic imo.

I think that the Jazz will have a good idea of where Conley sits before the draft. Maybe not, because they failed to get a good read on Hayward, but in theory the Jazz should be fairly certain if he's coming back or not. Negations start way before the moratorium. If they are picking for themselves on draft night I think it's a tell that they know Conley is not coming back because I don't think Smith will choose the pick over $90M and Favors. I just have a hard time seeing all the salary coming back, and Favors is the obvious place to cut it.
 
The Tucker deal showed gross incompotence and while I get what you're saying about feeling validated with DL's ousting, the guy who was running day to day and most of the FO is still here. Everyone in that FO who let it happen should be ashamed because messing up the numbers is not a one man job.

If I were running things, I'd try to move off of Bogey and Clarkson for younger and cheaper cost controlled players or draft picks. We had a two year window to compete, we failed, so now it's time to restructure as the focus should be DM's next contract. I just don't see us doing that, however, and it's also difficult to find those moves because the draft is before free agency. Teams that would want those players are looking to win now and probably have higher hopes for their space. Favors would be a salary dump situation to a bad team so it's much more realistic imo.

I think that the Jazz will have a good idea of where Conley sits before the draft. Maybe not, because they failed to get a good read on Hayward, but in theory the Jazz should be fairly certain if he's coming back or not. Negations start way before the moratorium. If they are picking for themselves on draft night I think it's a tell that they know Conley is not coming back because I don't think Smith will choose the pick over $90M and Favors. I just have a hard time seeing all the salary coming back, and Favors is the obvious place to cut it.
I'm with you... on all of this. I think they would do a full front office pivot if it wasn't such a critical time in the franchise. I will say that the report that DL basically said "eff you guys I'm taking Udoka" may have been how things went. I imagine some assistant front office person injecting themselves in the Favs and JC negotiations and saying "hey we need to shave a couple million off these deals to avoid the tax" and being completely ignored... then DL thinking we will figure that out later. Even if they had flipped the Udoka pick for a second... and then taken Udoka in the 30s... because he would have been there... it may have given them the necessary wiggle room.

I agree the draft is the tell... I think I said as much somewhere. If we move back even if its just for seconds it will shave some dollars off... sucks to make decisions based on a rookie making 900k vs. 2M but that's kinda where we are.
 
Once again...I do understand the implications. But I also understand that the penalty has zero impact on me. Tax penalty is 100% Ryan Smith. Obviously his decision effects the basketball product, but simply talking about the penalty, zero impact on anyone but his finances. I understand if he doesn't want to spend his money, but if he does I'm not feeling sorry him.

I don't believe Ryan Smith could be so unaware that he didn't know the tax bill was coming, so that gives me some hope that he doesn't care either. But then again, he just sold a second round pick to save what...200k on Rayjon Tucker. This is after spending $3M in cash for Elijah Hughes....so maybe he isn't all there.

When it comes down to it, I expect our first round pick to be traded to dump salary. If it doesn't, I think it's all but guaranteed that Conley is gone. Don't see all of the salary coming back next year.
I actually don’t think the team was planning to pay the tax last year. I think signing Favors to the contract they did only begins to make sense under the premise of not being in the tax last year. Then the cap math got totally ****ing botched.
 
I actually don’t think the team was planning to pay the tax last year. I think signing Favors to the contract they did only begins to make sense under the premise of not being in the tax last year. Then the cap math got totally ****ing botched.
There is no way they could have planned to be in the tax the year before Don and Rudy's extensions kicked in. The only other explanation besides screwing up the math is that they planned on being bad and moving a deal at the deadline, but couldn't justify it based on the standings.
 
One "meh" deal that may work... Favs for Thomas Bryant. Bryant only has one year left on his deal. He tore his ACL in February... could be back by December/January, but Wiz will want a solid vet center to pair with Gafford. This allows them to get a replacement without changing too much of the math with their offseason.

We do it because he makes a million less than Favs... so saves us $4M... we could waive and stretch him... or a third team like OKC could absorb his salary for lighter compensation. If we kept him we could roll with Udoka as the backup for the first few months of the season... maybe he's good. If not then Bryant can take over in the spring. Big savings when Bryant's deal expires. Allows us to be in the range to duck the repeater tax.
 
I preached DL was an idiot before and was persecuted now look. Hopefully Wade and Smith can fix his stupidity.
I hate told-you-so's, generally, but...

A handful of years ago, I was basically run off the board (by Fish and a few other dullards) for suggesting that the jury was still out on DL. At the time, I pointed out that DL had inherited a playoff team with 2 near-all stars (Millsap proved to be an all-star upon leaving) and four young lottery picks, but had yet to build a team any better than the one he inherited (or the ones KOC had built in the initial post-S2M era).

Well, there were 9 post-S2M KOC Jazz teams and now 9 post-KOC DL teams, and I think it's tough to make the case that DL has done better job in his 9 years than KOC did in his last 9, despite having a much more advantageous starting point:

Record
KOC: 390-332, .540 (44.3 wins over an 82-game season)
DL: 391-327, .545 (44.7 wins over an 82-game season)

Playoffs
KOC: 5 appearances, 4 series wins
DL: 5 appearances, 3 series wins

It's worth reiterating that the Jazz had a stockpile of young talent and a couple expiring near all-stars when DL came on, and the Jazz currently have very little in the way of assets and financial flexibility to improve the current team--although they do have two stars.

DL's not a terrible GM/Executive, mind you, just not a particularly creative or proactive one.
 
One "meh" deal that may work... Favs for Thomas Bryant. Bryant only has one year left on his deal. He tore his ACL in February... could be back by December/January, but Wiz will want a solid vet center to pair with Gafford. This allows them to get a replacement without changing too much of the math with their offseason.

We do it because he makes a million less than Favs... so saves us $4M... we could waive and stretch him... or a third team like OKC could absorb his salary for lighter compensation. If we kept him we could roll with Udoka as the backup for the first few months of the season... maybe he's good. If not then Bryant can take over in the spring. Big savings when Bryant's deal expires. Allows us to be in the range to duck the repeater tax.
I like that deal and if he had anything left in the tank when he came back I think it would be a net positive.
 
I hate told-you-so's, generally, but...

A handful of years ago, I was basically run off the board (by Fish and a few other dullards) for suggesting that the jury was still out on DL. At the time, I pointed out that DL had inherited a playoff team with 2 near-all stars (Millsap proved to be an all-star upon leaving) and four young lottery picks, but had yet to build a team any better than the one he inherited (or the ones KOC had built in the initial post-S2M era).

Well, there were 9 post-S2M KOC Jazz teams and now 9 post-KOC DL teams, and I think it's tough to make the case that DL has done better job in his 9 years than KOC did in his last 9, despite having a much more advantageous starting point:

Record
KOC: 390-332, .540 (44.3 wins over an 82-game season)
DL: 391-327, .545 (44.7 wins over an 82-game season)

Playoffs
KOC: 5 appearances, 4 series wins
DL: 5 appearances, 3 series wins

It's worth reiterating that the Jazz had a stockpile of young talent and a couple expiring near all-stars when DL came on, and the Jazz currently have very little in the way of assets and financial flexibility to improve the current team--although they do have two stars.

DL's not a terrible GM/Executive, mind you, just not a particularly creative or proactive one.
Very interesting. Good post

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I hate told-you-so's, generally, but...

A handful of years ago, I was basically run off the board (by Fish and a few other dullards) for suggesting that the jury was still out on DL. At the time, I pointed out that DL had inherited a playoff team with 2 near-all stars (Millsap proved to be an all-star upon leaving) and four young lottery picks, but had yet to build a team any better than the one he inherited (or the ones KOC had built in the initial post-S2M era).

Well, there were 9 post-S2M KOC Jazz teams and now 9 post-KOC DL teams, and I think it's tough to make the case that DL has done better job in his 9 years than KOC did in his last 9, despite having a much more advantageous starting point:

Record
KOC: 390-332, .540 (44.3 wins over an 82-game season)
DL: 391-327, .545 (44.7 wins over an 82-game season)

Playoffs
KOC: 5 appearances, 4 series wins
DL: 5 appearances, 3 series wins

It's worth reiterating that the Jazz had a stockpile of young talent and a couple expiring near all-stars when DL came on, and the Jazz currently have very little in the way of assets and financial flexibility to improve the current team--although they do have two stars.

DL's not a terrible GM/Executive, mind you, just not a particularly creative or proactive one.
DL loves missionary every Wednesday and Saturday night.
 
I like that deal and if he had anything left in the tank when he came back I think it would be a net positive.
Yeah I've liked him... he's energetic and can shoot it a little. He's not great on the defensive side of the ball but the bench units aren't exactly awesome there.

The other thing that could happen is Udoka actually looks good and when Bryant is healthy he has a movable contract to get us something we need more.
 
Yeah I've liked him... he's energetic and can shoot it a little. He's not great on the defensive side of the ball but the bench units aren't exactly awesome there.

The other thing that could happen is Udoka actually looks good and when Bryant is healthy he has a movable contract to get us something we need more.
I thought Udoka had the right amount of athleticism to give us something of an unproven Udoh. Of course this would never happen as long as Favors is on the roster. I still don’t understand the Favors stuff… what we need is Rudy-lite if we’re running the same defensive plan, but because Favors has good hands we pretend he’s a better Rudy-lite than the real Rudy-lites because he can run the PNR with Ingles, or something.
 
I thought Udoka had the right amount of athleticism to give us something of an unproven Udoh. Of course this would never happen as long as Favors is on the roster. I still don’t understand the Favors stuff… what we need is Rudy-lite if we’re running the same defensive plan, but because Favors has good hands we pretend he’s a better Rudy-lite than the real Rudy-lites because he can run the PNR with Ingles, or something.
We need to see him out there so we can decide on his team options… having Bryant recovering would give us a window into what he can be and give us a safety net.

Wizards would need a stop gap option while he recovers. I’m guessing with Gafford playing well they may not want to pay Bryant (maybe he won’t get much).

once he’s healthy Bryant has more trade value than he does and someone may need him. If Udoka sucks we can go to Bryant and maybe he becomes a long term option to backup Rudy and give us some slight spacing.
 
If we are really looking to dump Favors' salary, the trades I'm looking at are:

Favors to NOLA for 2nd rounders. They have 4 of them this year, so it's worth it for them if they want his presence back.
It's not like it should disappoint Favors too much: https://hoopshype.com/rumor/derrick-favors-hopes-to-be-back-with-pelicans/

Favors to Boston for a couple of their young, unproven guys like Langford and NeSmith.
Everyone knows Boston needs help down low. This only frees up a couple million, but at least it's something.

Favors to SA for their 2021 2nd rounder and a future 2nd rounder.
He's a good vet and Pop would probably appreciate him. They have loads of cap space.

Favors to Charlotte for 2nd round picks
They want reinforcements in the post.

Favors to New York for Knox
With Thibs in charge, they want guys who are ready to play now. Thibs seems to have given up on Knox. We could try to rebuild him, but if it doesn't work, it still saves us $4 million this year and Knox expires after the year.
 
I'm with you... on all of this. I think they would do a full front office pivot if it wasn't such a critical time in the franchise. I will say that the report that DL basically said "eff you guys I'm taking Udoka" may have been how things went. I imagine some assistant front office person injecting themselves in the Favs and JC negotiations and saying "hey we need to shave a couple million off these deals to avoid the tax" and being completely ignored... then DL thinking we will figure that out later. Even if they had flipped the Udoka pick for a second... and then taken Udoka in the 30s... because he would have been there... it may have given them the necessary wiggle room.

I agree the draft is the tell... I think I said as much somewhere. If we move back even if its just for seconds it will shave some dollars off... sucks to make decisions based on a rookie making 900k vs. 2M but that's kinda where we are.

The incoming FO overhaul makes a lot of sense when you consider how badly they botched the numbers. There were so many ways to shave off enough money to dodge the tax, but they ended up wasting picks to not even duck it. I remember doing all the mental match about weird ways they could duck it. I even justified the Doke pick assuming that he took 80% of the rookie scale to make it work. Nope, they just ****ed up badly. They couldn't get JC or Favs to shave off a million or two to save tens of millions later down the line. NBA owners should put faith in their FO to handle these things correctly, but the Jazz FO just failed horribly.

It seems like Quin is seeing a rise of power and honestly that makes me uncomfortable. I don't think he's earned that. Honestly, it kinda feels like the Philly situation with Brett Brown. He's receiving a lot of power but if he doesn't get the job done the new FO will replace him quickly.
 
If we are really looking to dump Favors' salary, the trades I'm looking at are:

Favors to NOLA for 2nd rounders. They have 4 of them this year, so it's worth it for them if they want his presence back.
It's not like it should disappoint Favors too much: https://hoopshype.com/rumor/derrick-favors-hopes-to-be-back-with-pelicans/

Favors to Boston for a couple of their young, unproven guys like Langford and NeSmith.
Everyone knows Boston needs help down low. This only frees up a couple million, but at least it's something.

Favors to SA for their 2021 2nd rounder and a future 2nd rounder.
He's a good vet and Pop would probably appreciate him. They have loads of cap space.

Favors to Charlotte for 2nd round picks
They want reinforcements in the post.

Favors to New York for Knox
With Thibs in charge, they want guys who are ready to play now. Thibs seems to have given up on Knox. We could try to rebuild him, but if it doesn't work, it still saves us $4 million this year and Knox expires after the year.
I don't think we get value back for Favs.. I think we'd be the ones giving picks in most of these deals. The NY one not so much... I think we could flip Knox to OKC and take the full savings. Nesmith and Langford is like incredibly slanted.
 
This is the problem with the team. We fell in love with personalities over winning a title.
and the top record in the west only may the homers more blind.

Reality sunk in when we embarrassed ourselves in the playoffs.

Some people still think Royce is the answer, or some really good player. It's mind blowing. He's OKAY but hes a weakness and
very overrated by some. Ingles too. These guys should be end of the rotation guys not key pieces.

I don't agree with this at all. Royce and Joe are both starter level players in this league. Both are great role players and complimentary pieces.
 
The incoming FO overhaul makes a lot of sense when you consider how badly they botched the numbers. There were so many ways to shave off enough money to dodge the tax, but they ended up wasting picks to not even duck it. I remember doing all the mental match about weird ways they could duck it. I even justified the Doke pick assuming that he took 80% of the rookie scale to make it work. Nope, they just ****ed up badly. They couldn't get JC or Favs to shave off a million or two to save tens of millions later down the line. NBA owners should put faith in their FO to handle these things correctly, but the Jazz FO just failed horribly.

It seems like Quin is seeing a rise of power and honestly that makes me uncomfortable. I don't think he's earned that. Honestly, it kinda feels like the Philly situation with Brett Brown. He's receiving a lot of power but if he doesn't get the job done the new FO will replace him quickly.
That's exactly the situation we were in.. it became a collaborative front office (Brand and Brown had the power). I have even heard the Scott O Niel (former philly CEO) may be coming to our organization... I'm not a fan at all. This is not a great route to take.
 
That's exactly the situation we were in.. it became a collaborative front office (Brand and Brown had the power). I have even heard the Scott O Niel (former philly CEO) may be coming to our organization... I'm not a fan at all. This is not a great route to take.

I think it would be good to get some fresh faces in the FO's. I don't anything about Scott O'Niel, but FO "talent" is very hard to evaluate. There are some exceptions where FO members are consistently good (or bad), but most track records are a mix of good and bad moves. Hell, look at DL. It's very easy to list out all of his failures, but he also built a title favorite almost entirely from the margins. Smart minds can make bad moves and bad ones can make good moves. It's the nature of the business.

I do love the idea of taking from MIA's FO though. They have been consistent in so many aspects. Finding undervalued talent, negotiating contracts, and attracting talent. They would never have botched their cap situation like the Jazz did. I much prefer that to Quin gaining power. I don't think the coach/GM combo as one person is a good idea and I suspect Quin is about to go down that Brett Brown path.
 
Back
Top