Is there a train wreck or plane crash emoji...
Fire Snyder - Jazz +10 when Favors plays but Snyder yanks him out
- Thread starter feeko
- Start date
Is there a train wreck or plane crash emoji...
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I'll probably take embiid off of that list in hindsight
idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
I couldn't think up a more boring, unoriginal troll attempt. And I'm pretty generic. Fecal should stick to his half assed OP job.
So we have the 4th best center in the league despite him having poor post play.
Tak
Well-Known Member
I see you are off you meds again.
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
Yes, just saying he could be better. Even Jokic, a player that's been briefly mentioned as a MVP candidate can be better. Denver wants him to lose weight for mobility etc. Just because you are really good doesn't mean you cant be better
Last edited:
I agree on the “can be better part”. Just emphasizing for the putz OP that his closest support in this thread has Gobert the 4th best.
Posts like this irritate me, mostly that first one. Gobert is not one post move away from being elite. The dude is elite already. The guy leads the league in points per shot already, so his efficiency is top notch. That is only looking at his offense. He is the best defender in the world. He is the captain of elite.
He is not the 4th best center in the league. He does not average 20ppg, but the extra he adds to the team is not seen out in his personal stats. He's been a beast this year, even when the team was sucking. His comments and tweets are elite. Everything Gobert does is elite.
Brow demanding a trade and being a punk, Embiid being an idiot, and Jokic just not being as good overall bump them all below Gobert for me even if they are more skilled offensively and play good defense.
/homer
Gobert is more elite at defense than Jokic is at offense. Jokic also sucks at defense. While Gobert cant really create for himself and isnt a go to bucket guy he is still really good on offense. Its a team game and he is the best in the NBA at creating team points with screens. He also sucks so many defenders in on his rolls that it creates a lot of space for the team. He also creates buckets with his rebounding game.
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
You are looking at Gobert with homer glasses on. I PERSONALLY think he is 4th best, but I would argue that most GMs around the league would put him lower on the list. To say that Embiid, Jokic, and Davis are worse than Gobert is just homerism
Last edited:
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
Jokic is obviously not as good as Gobert defensively. Jokic on the other hand can score, and facilitate for his team with passing. Gobert NEEDS 1 other player involved to get him his points. He either needs someone to lob/set him up for a dunk, or he needs another player to miss to get a putback. Gobert NEEDS 1 other player for help for him to get any offense.
That being said, all I'm saying is just he needs to be able to get himself a bucket sometimes and not rely on lobs or putbacks all the time
Last edited:
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
Yeah, you're right, he's off his meds.
Yes, Gobert needs another player to help him score and to set things up and run plays with. Thankfully there are always 4 teammates on the court with him, so thats not really an issue.
Jokic is a terrible defender. All advanced stats point to Gobert helping his team win more. You are severely underrating half of the game. I like Jokic but ill take Gobert over him.
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
We'll agree to disagree then.
If we are playing 1 on 1 maybe I'd take Jokic, and I'd for sure take AD and Embiid. Luckily we are talking 5 on 5 here, a team game. Even Kobe had to rely on his teammates to be standing on the other side of the floor so he would have space to work, so you can see even the most selfish type of game still needs teammates to do things properly.
I would agree with you though, if you don't factor defense at all into the equation and ignore how team plays into things, Gobert may be only the 4th best center in the world.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
What you have to like about Gobert is that he is coachable! His game is going to improve each year slowly but surely!
LifeOnaPlate
Well-Known Member
lol this is a great take bro
Engorged On Unborn Gore
Well-Known Member
If you don't rate defense it's more like "agree to no further dialogue, because one of us espouses a mythology of basketball".
This **** about Favors in the OP ignores the fact that his body is historically incapable of playing starter's minutes for a full NBA season. 20-24 minutes is perfect for him to keep him healthy and maximize the number of games that he is able to be an actual contributor.
This **** about Favors in the OP ignores the fact that his body is historically incapable of playing starter's minutes for a full NBA season. 20-24 minutes is perfect for him to keep him healthy and maximize the number of games that he is able to be an actual contributor.
Alfalfa
Well-Known Member
Or we can agree that you're wrong.
Kyoto
Well-Known Member
Kobe didnt need another player for him to get his own shot. How many times has he taken the last shot of a game/quarter when everyone in the arena knew he was going to shoot it?
In any event, sure let's just say that I over value offense. I would still say Embiid and Anthony are better centers and move Gobert to #3. Anthony is close to being just as good of a defender as Gobert, but significantly better offensively. Embiid is a good defensive center, not excellent, but good, and he is significantly better at offense.
So, even if I have a higher value for defense when I rate the centers, it would put Gobert at #3. Which I may add, is really really good.
I find it amazing how if I say Gobert is the 4th or 3rd best center in the league that people are offended by that. Haha like, that's still really good, what's the big deal?