What's new
By:

Following 2016 potential draftees

MDAV28 said:
To me the #3 is so much less valuable than 1 and 2 in this draft that I probably wouldn't give any real asset we have that could make the Celtics even consider. Definitely not Hayward.
Click to expand...

My contingency was if DL feels he leaves next summer. If they feel they can resign him then i wouldnt trade.
 
zyzz said:
New Malachi Richardson breakdown

https://www.draftexpress.com/articl...aft-Scouting-Report-and-Video-Breakdown-5506/

Also, am I the only one still on Skal island?
Click to expand...

Richardson's struggles are a combination of bad shot-selection in the mid-range area (where he hit just 24% of his 2-point jumpers), to go along with his difficulties finishing effectively inside the paint. His game is built heavily around taking and making contested shots, and he can be quite a ball-stopper at times, overdribbling and freezing out his teammates frequently, not really reacting to the defense, and deciding what shot he wants to take before he starts his move. This is a tough way of making a living, but when those contested jump-shots are falling, it can be extremely impressive. The problem is when they don't, he can shoot his team right out of games. The hope is he can learn how to better utilize his talent and figure out how to take advantage of his terrific scoring instincts in a more structured role under the tutelage of a strong NBA coaching staff.
Click to expand...

Although I am a FIRM believer in Quin and his ability to develop players, that whole paragraph screams stay away.
 
MDAV28 said:
Although I am a FIRM believer in Quin and his ability to develop players, that whole paragraph screams stay away.
Click to expand...

That section screams the bad DeRozan to me. I'm not a DDR fan at all. He'll help you win regular season games but I feel like his lack of versatility hurts his team come postseason play.
 
For the record, I like Richardson but I would be disappointed if he was taken at 12. Trade down for him and add some assets if he's the pick. Just my opinion.

I feel the same about Maker. If he's the pick then trade down and then get him. I think somewhere in the early 20's is still safe enough.
 
orangello said:
That section screams the bad DeRozan to me. I'm not a DDR fan at all. He'll help you win regular season games but I feel like his lack of versatility hurts his team come postseason play.
Click to expand...

Richardson has already shown to be a better shooter than DDR. Break him from those bad habits and he could be a very good add to this up and coming squad. This might seem like a bad comp but I think he is a taller Waiters. OKC seems to have broken Waiters of his bad habits and he's looking like much more of a threat this postseason.
 
Its like drafting Nick Young but possibly being able to coach the Nick Young out of him.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
King Cy said:
The part where it said teams are divided on him sounds like Utah might be one of the teams that like him.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


Jazz have reportedly interviewed Richardson. Also Brown. I think there's interest there. I also think the Jazz would readily trade a future pick along with #12 to move up a few spots.
 
stitches said:
I'm on the Skal island. I thought I was the owner and sole inhabitant of the island. Nice to see other people around. He's no. 4 on my board right now.
Click to expand...
I'm going to have to look into this skal fellow.

Any highlight videos you want to post?
 
King Cy said:
Its like drafting Nick Young but possibly being able to coach the Nick Young out of him.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Lol, good analogy
 
orangello said:
That section screams the bad DeRozan to me. I'm not a DDR fan at all. He'll help you win regular season games but I feel like his lack of versatility hurts his team come postseason play.
Click to expand...

Except that Richardson is a much better shooter and probably a better ball handler than DeRozan, and he's only 20. DeRozan relies on athleticism, a big first step and extension to the rim. Richardson is crafty and versatile in creating his shot.
 
fishonjazz said:
I'm going to have to look into this skal fellow.

Any highlight videos you want to post?
Click to expand...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF_cWYmUZVw

Hook shot with BOTH hands.
Turn around jumper!
Silky smooth standstill jumper. Would be great target for pick and pop. I think he's one of the most skilled bigs in this draft.
Athleticism, size, length. Smoothness and quickness of movement for his size.
Good timing on contests and rim protection.

Needs to add strength and toughness... a lot of it. Need to improve bball IQ, but keep in mind he hasn't been playing basketball for a long time. I think he can improve that.
 
Catchall said:
Except that Richardson is a much better shooter and probably a better ball handler than DeRozan, and he's only 20. DeRozan relies on athleticism, a big first step and extension to the rim. Richardson is crafty and versatile in creating his shot.
Click to expand...

All fair points (especially the shooting). I just don't like the idea of someone who's "game is built heavily around taking and making contested shots" and "can be quite a ball-stopper at times" not to mention "overdribbling and freezing out his teammates frequently" and the worst yet "not really reacting to the defense, and deciding what shot he wants to take before he starts his move". Does that sound like someone you'd want to add to a team that talks a lot about chemistry?

His shooting is streaky but better than DDR. I just hope he is not nicknamed "Black Hole" Richardson.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top