If we are to draft a pure SG I would take Beal. He is having a pretty good year despite having to play with 2 ball dominant combo guards. He is listed as 6'3 on ESPN, but he looks at least 6'4 (and a long 6'4 at that).
If we are to draft a pure SG I would take Beal. He is having a pretty good year despite having to play with 2 ball dominant combo guards. He is listed as 6'3 on ESPN, but he looks at least 6'4 (and a long 6'4 at that).
If we are to draft a pure SG I would take Beal. He is having a pretty good year despite having to play with 2 ball dominant combo guards. He is listed as 6'3 on ESPN, but he looks at least 6'4 (and a long 6'4 at that).
He is 6'4, for sure, but pure PG .. no.
I LOVE beal .. but he's a combo .. difference between him and, say, Wroten, is he's heady. Smart kid.
He is 6'4, for sure, but pure PG .. no.
I LOVE beal .. but he's a combo .. difference between him and, say, Wroten, is he's heady. Smart kid.
CT called him a pure SG, not PG. Just so you know haha.
Wroten or Beal? I'm assuming nothing ..
Funny thing is both suck at shooting this year.
If we are to draft a pure SG I would take Beal. He is having a pretty good year despite having to play with 2 ball dominant combo guards. He is listed as 6'3 on ESPN, but he looks at least 6'4 (and a long 6'4 at that).
I fail to see where I mention either PG or Wroten in this quote.
I must admit I'm a little disappointed in Beal's shooting touch this year. Strong kid, a good athlete, and an elite pure SG should be able to muster better than 42% from the field and 34% from three. I suspect we'll see good improvement, but if not, I'd be cautious.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'd take Rivers ahead of either Beal or Lamb. I hate Duke and I dislike Rivers, but I think he'll be the better pro .. he has 'it.'
Also, never thought I'd say this, but I believe he could be transformed into a PG ..
Wow. That is what I would like to see but I thought it was wishful thinking. What makes you think that he could be transformed into a PG?
I must admit I'm a little disappointed in Beal's shooting touch this year. Strong kid, a good athlete, and an elite pure SG should be able to muster better than 42% from the field and 34% from three. I suspect we'll see good improvement, but if not, I'd be cautious.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'd take Rivers ahead of either Beal or Lamb. I hate Duke and I dislike Rivers, but I think he'll be the better pro .. he has 'it.'
Also, never thought I'd say this, but I believe he could be transformed into a PG ..
Due to his size, Beal seems like his upside would be Ben Gordon. That wouldn't be bad for an 8-14 pick, but would rather KOC roll the dice on a player with a little higher ceiling.
Bradley Beal is bigger than Ben Gordon. DX said that he was 6'4.5 in shoes as of April 2011. He also is also quite lengthy. His size will never be a problem in the NBA, or hold him back.
Maybe ..
He has good handles, can pass (he's just always rather shoot), sees the floor well, and doesn't flinch in adversity. A lot of college freshmen have a difficult time transitioning from them being the only scoring in option on their high school team, to being surrounded by scorers. That's why so many appear selfish (which I think Rivers is). Having said that, Rivers wants to win more than anything else. I don't see him as selfish as much as egotistical .. which isn't all bad if handled properly.
Rivers can shoot from anywhere on the floor (NBA range with ease) and can slice into the lane anytime he wants. I think he has the tools and the smarts .. the question is whether he has the willingness.
He's going to be one of the underrated players in the draft if he's taken around 12 or lower .. and he probably will.
Wow. That would be awesome if the Jazz could land both K-G and Rivers.With our ball-handlers (Burks and Hayward) a shoot first point guard isn't the worst thing. Personally I am high on Kidd-Gilchrist and Rivers.