What's new

Following potential 2012 draftees

I honestly don't think they'll make it out of the 2nd round.



You think you hate him? Think of me man...our front court consists of Mason/Miles Plumlee and Ryan Kelly. Absolute garbage.

How many teams in college do you think have a better frontcourt. Not that bad really. Kind of surprised they redshirted Marshall seems like he could have helped this year.
 
How many teams in college do you think have a better frontcourt. Not that bad really. Kind of surprised they redshirted Marshall seems like he could have helped this year.

They aren't that bad, but they are so unskilled it's not even funny (besides Kelly, but he is just soft). Mason can't hit a FT to save his life, Miles just sucks, and Kelly is soft.
 
Interesting article on a potential big man prospect in Jeff Withey and some tidbits on the eyebrow from Kentucky in there.

February 17, 2012
How Jeff Withey Happened
The Inside Story


by C.J. Moore
Printer-
friendly

Bill Self had seen enough. All year Self had been on Jeff Withey to be more aggressive. Days before he had gone scoreless in 24 minutes at Missouri. And now, Withey had failed to go after a loose ball at practice.

"Touch every stair in the building!" Self screamed.

Three games later, Self and the rest of the nation are trying to wrap their heads around how KU's 7-footer could go from invisible to outshining Thomas Robinson.

"It's unbelievable," Self said. "Players are in his face getting after his butt after the Missouri game. Then all of the sudden, you make a couple baskets and get your confidence back and next thing you know...."

This was late Monday night in Manhattan, and Self's voice trailed off, as you could see the wheels turning in his head as he tried to comprehend, just like all of us, how Withey pulled off the turnaround.

The numbers alone are tough to comprehend. Withey's three-game stretch is as good as any three-game stretch of any big man in the country. Take a look.

At Baylor: 25 points, 5 rebounds, 3 blocks
Vs. Oklahoma State: 18 points, 20 rebounds, 7 blocks
At K-State: 18 points, 11 rebounds, 9 blocks
Average: 20.3 points, 11.3 rebounds, 6.3 blocks

Compare those numbers to the best three-game stretches by All-American candidates Anthony Davis, Thomas Robinson, and Jared Sullinger.

Davis (Jan. 11-17): 19.6 points, 9.3 rebounds, 5.6 blocks
Robinson (Dec. 6-19): 22.7 points, 12 rebounds, 0.7 blocks
Sullinger (Jan. 3-10): 22.7 points, 8.3 rebounds, 0.3 blocks

How it happened
Before the Missouri game, Withey was already playing some of his best basketball of the season -- just not so emphatically. He had scored in double figures six straight games and averaged 11.7 points. During that stretch, he had seven blocks against Baylor and eight against Texas A&M.

Still, Withey had been hearing it from Self to go after the ball with more aggression and grab more rebounds. That's not so easy to do when you play next to a rebounding hog like Robinson, who leads the nation in defensive rebounding percentage.

Self's main complaint after the Missouri game was Withey allowed himself to be obsolete. He had Missouri guard Kim English guarding him, but he didn't demand the ball. KU's guards also didn't make it a point to find the big man.

Baylor helped change that. The focus of the Bears' zone defense was to slow Robinson. Every time he touched it, Robinson was surrounded by two or three players.

The Jayhawks adjusted late in the first half that night by attacking with either Tyshawn Taylor penetrating into the middle of the zone or by throwing the ball to the short corner. When Taylor penetrated, he found Withey. When the ball went to the short corner, Withey dove to the rim and got easy baskets.

The Oklahoma State and K-State games weren't much different. Neither team played zone, but in both games all of Withey's baskets were at the rim. In fact, over the last three games Withey has 11 layups or tip-ins, five dunks and one jumper, which he shot inside the paint.

Kansas is using Withey in much the same way that Missouri uses Ricardo Ratliffe. Ratliffe is incredibly efficient because he gets a majority of his baskets off the penetration of MU's guards or on cutbacks.

Withey, like Ratliffe, has put himself in the right spot at the right time. To his credit, he's finishing at the rim (20 of 31 in the last three games).

"That's why you run your offense, is to get easy baskets," Self said. "It's not like he's catching the ball eight feet out, backing his guy down and shaking a guy, then going over his other shoulder. That's not what he's doing. He's making easy plays and guys are doing a good job of getting him the ball."

Withey: Anthony Davis-like
What really separates Withey's three-game stretch from the All-Americans, other than Davis, is his impact on the defensive end. Withey has 19 blocks in the last three games, and Baylor, OSU and KSU combined to make only 37 percent of their two-point field goal attempts.

Kansas is second in the nation at two-point FG percentage defense at 39.3 percent, and Kentucky is No. 1 at 37.7 percent. It's pretty simple to figure out why: Kentucky has Davis protecting the rim and KU has Withey.

Davis has received all the publicity for leading the nation in blocks and for his 15.2 block percentage, but Withey is not very far off at 15.0.

Sports Illustrated's Luke Winn has been tracking Davis' blocks this season. Kentucky, according to Winn's research, gains possession an impressive 56.8 percent of the time when Davis blocks a shot.

Withey is also a master at blocking a shot to a teammate or himself -- he credits playing volleyball growing up -- so I researched how often KU gains possession of a Withey block, how often Withey blocks a shot to himself and how often a Withey block goes out of bounds.

Withey blocks: 88
KU gains possession: 56 times (63.6 percent)
Withey rebounds block: 14
Withey block out of bounds: 5

Davis might be the better shot blocker by a hair, but Withey's blocks have resulted in a higher percentage of takeaways.

Will Withey keep it up?
One lost statistic from Withey's performance at K-State was that he played a season-high 37 minutes. He has only played 60 percent of available minutes this season, and against Missouri, Self was forced to go small to match up with the Tigers' four-guard lineup.

However, if Self checked the stats after the Missouri game, he would have found that the Jayhawks were still better with Withey on the floor, as they outscored the Tigers by 12 points in his 23 minutes. Even when Withey is not asserting himself on offense, his defense is valuable enough to keep him on the court. In the last three games Withey has played 82 percent of the available minutes.

It's hard to believe Withey will continue to put up the points he's been scoring, although it was hard to believe that he would respond to going scoreless at Missouri like he has, and he has defied the odds all season.

Withey was one of the main reasons before the season that many doubted Kansas could contend for an eighth straight Big 12 title and be one of the top teams in the country. After all, he couldn't even crack Self's rotation last season -- he averaged 6.2 minutes per game and had 12 DNPs.

As Withey ran the Fieldhouse steps last week, he thought about what he meant to his team and how he was letting them down. If the Jayhawks find end up winning the Big 12 and have success in March, the turning point, Self will say, was a practice in early February when Jeff Withey decided not to go after a loose ball.

"Ever since then, I know Coach depends on me and my teammates depend on me to play great, so I needed to step it up," Withey said. "I don't want to be running bleachers anymore, that's for sure."

C.J. Moore is a writer in Kansas City. Follow him on Twitter: @cjmoore4.
 
What makes you want him so badly?

Electric with the ball in his hands, real nice court vision to go with nice size and athleticism for the position.

I understand his perimeter game needs work, and he needs to figure out how to reel it in a bit and not be out of control as often as he is - but he's got the tools!
 
No PG is worth taking in the lottery. Take the BSFA and then the BPA .. figure out who to keep and who to package for a PG. Miles ahead.
 
Some notables in action today;

UK
Anthony Davis
MKG
TJones
Teague
DLamb

KU
TRobinson

OSU
Sullinger

UNC
Marshall
Barnes
Henson
Zeller

Baylor
PJones
QMiller

UNLV
Moser

UF
Beal
Young

UConn
JLamb
Drummond

MissSt
Moultrie
Hood

Iona
Machado

Texas
Kabongo
 
Some notables in action today;

UK
Anthony Davis
MKG
TJones
Teague
DLamb

KU
TRobinson

OSU
Sullinger

UNC
Marshall
Barnes
Henson
Zeller

Baylor
PJones
QMiller

UNLV
Moser

UF
Beal
Young

UConn
JLamb
Drummond

MissSt
Moultrie
Hood

Iona
Machado

Texas
Kabongo

I can't believe that you left off Lillard. He also plays today.
 
I can't believe that you left off Lillard. He also plays today.

I'm gonna have to neg rep him for that. Obviously did it on purpose to slight the little man.


In all seriousness, thanks PKM. It's great having you here as probably our expert on college players.

/Wanna get a room?
 
Dear PKM and other knowledgeables,

How would your describe the differences in play and the differing potential between Quincy Miller and Harrison Barnes. thanks in advance.
 
Alright now hear me out on this one...there's a guy that I'm really feeling right now. Mike Moser. I honestly think he would really fit into our team well...athletic, fast, decent outside shot that he can develop. Players I would compare him to would be a combo of Trevor Ariza and Shawn Marion.

Seriously though, just picture it.... Some PG (Harris, maybe Rivers, maybe Marshall), Hayward, Moser, Kanter, Favors with Burks coming off the bench. That is a high powered, athletic offensive team with great length and quickness on defense. I like it. Only questionable part would be shooting...that would still be a weakness, but something to think about IMO.
 
Dear PKM and other knowledgeables,

How would your describe the differences in play and the differing potential between Quincy Miller and Harrison Barnes. thanks in advance.

IMO, putting it really simply, Barnes has peaked and Miller hasn't. Barnes has absolutely zero ability to create his own shot...I wouldn't touch him in the lottery.
 
I dont watch much college ball, (other than byu) but today while on break at work i watched some of the missouri game.
There is a player on thier team named Kim English who had 19 points and 6 rebounds with 10 minutes left in the game. I saw him hit a few 3's and seemed like he has a real pretty shot. He looks to be the size of a small forward (not sure what position he is) and seemed to hustle for rebounds and play good D.
Missouri is ranked #3 and he seems to be quite good. Anybody know anything about him? Why is no one talking about him? Is he just having a good game today, but normally isn't very good? PKM? Cyrone? Any info would be appreciated.
 
Dear PKM and other knowledgeables,

How would your describe the differences in play and the differing potential between Quincy Miller and Harrison Barnes. thanks in advance.

Difference in play:

Miller is a great isolation player; he loves to take his man off the dribble and has a deadly combination of crossovers and so on. He also has the size and foot work to develop into a very good post player for a SF. Not to mention he is shooting over 40% from 3, and is doing it with spot up jumpers and jumpers off the dribble (creating his own shot). He's also a willing enough, and often creative passer. So overall, a very complete offensive game, especially for someone his age. He has all the tools/abilities (except elite level athleticism) to become a deadly scorer in the NBA.

Barnes, on the other hand, could be criticized for his seeming inability to create his own shot. If you look at the stats posted earlier, his production dramatically decreases the more times he dribbles. Having said that, he is proving to be an incredible shooter. He seems to be able to shoot off the dribble, as well as spot up jumpers. From what I've seen, I'd say is decent playing with his back to the basket (not on the level of Miller, but there's something there). His passing? Well...it's almost non-existent. One thing I would say he has on Miller, along with shooting, is moving without the basketball. He has a high BBIQ and knows when to slash to the basket to receive a pass or go for an offensive put back.

Defensively, they have both shown good ability, imo, but I would give Barnes the edge in defending opposing wings at this point. However, Miller is probably the more versatile defender as he has the size and IQ in the post, that you could have him defend in the post in certain situations, and often did in high school (not sure how much of that he has done at Baylor).

Difference in potential:

Miller just seems to have a more versatile, deadly offensive arsenal of moves, while Barnes could be labeled has having too few dimensions to his game to imagine him as a top 10 player in the NBA. Though, I would say Barnes is the slightly more athletic of the two (though Miller is still recovering from an ACL injury, so we can't know that for sure). Overall, I would say due to Miller's advantage in size and versatility he has more potential as an NBA prospect, but more importantly, I see more of a fire in his eyes than I do in Barnes. I can see Barnes becoming a 20ppg scorer in the league one day (doing it within the flow of the offense), while I feel comfortable saying Miller has the potential to average 25ppg.
 
I dont watch much college ball, (other than byu) but today while on break at work i watched some of the missouri game.
There is a player on thier team named Kim English who had 19 points and 6 rebounds with 10 minutes left in the game. I saw him hit a few 3's and seemed like he has a real pretty shot. He looks to be the size of a small forward (not sure what position he is) and seemed to hustle for rebounds and play good D.
Missouri is ranked #3 and he seems to be quite good. Anybody know anything about him? Why is no one talking about him? Is he just having a good game today, but normally isn't very good? PKM? Cyrone? Any info would be appreciated.


He's a good shooter who really doesn't do anything else well. Just average at everything other than shooting, 2nd round pick at best.
 
Difference in play:

Miller is a great isolation player; he loves to take his man off the dribble and has a deadly combination of crossovers and so on. He also has the size and foot work to develop into a very good post player for a SF. Not to mention he is shooting over 40% from 3, and is doing it with spot up jumpers and jumpers off the dribble (creating his own shot). He's also a willing enough, and often creative passer. So overall, a very complete offensive game, especially for someone his age. He has all the tools/abilities (except elite level athleticism) to become a deadly scorer in the NBA.

Barnes, on the other hand, could be criticized for his seeming inability to create his own shot. If you look at the stats posted earlier, his production dramatically decreases the more times he dribbles. Having said that, he is proving to be an incredible shooter. He seems to be able to shoot off the dribble, as well as spot up jumpers. From what I've seen, I'd say is decent playing with his back to the basket (not on the level of Miller, but there's something there). His passing? Well...it's almost non-existent. One thing I would say he has on Miller, along with shooting, is moving without the basketball. He has a high BBIQ and knows when to slash to the basket to receive a pass or go for an offensive put back.

Defensively, they have both shown good ability, imo, but I would give Barnes the edge in defending opposing wings at this point. However, Miller is probably the more versatile defender as he has the size and IQ in the post, that you could have him defend in the post in certain situations, and often did in high school (not sure how much of that he has done at Baylor).

Difference in potential:

Miller just seems to have a more versatile, deadly offensive arsenal of moves, while Barnes could be labeled has having too few dimensions to his game to imagine him as a top 10 player in the NBA. Though, I would say Barnes is the slightly more athletic of the two (though Miller is still recovering from an ACL injury, so we can't know that for sure). Overall, I would say due to Miller's advantage in size and versatility he has more potential as an NBA prospect, but more importantly, I see more of a fire in his eyes than I do in Barnes. I can see Barnes becoming a 20ppg scorer in the league one day (doing it within the flow of the offense), while I feel comfortable saying Miller has the potential to average 25ppg.

Based on this and what PKM says, I would guess he's a guy that will shoot up the draft boards. Right now, most mocks seem to have him in our range (#13).....
 
Based on this and what PKM says, I would guess he's a guy that will shoot up the draft boards. Right now, most mocks seem to have him in our range (#13).....

He's in my top 5, and always has been. He's just not in a situation where he can fully display his talents due to being surrounded by a talented Baylor team, and not having recovered 100% from his ACL injury. This might keep him in our range (8-14).
 
Back
Top