What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

Revolution 9 said:
All of the PGs at our draft position have major question marks.

Dennis Schroeder maturity issues, and can he hit enough jumpers to be successful. McCollum isn't great at the pick n roll, and could be another 2 stuck in a Pg's body. Watch his DX video he makes a lot of errors running the team. MCW is flawed like the rest, but he has to be considered. If we choose one of these guys their success will rely on how well they can close the holes in their games.
Click to expand...

#Voice_of_Reason
 
BHP said:
All good points Hotttnickkk, I can see why he could be a good pick and a good player, I dont know why exactly I dont like him, I just have a gut feeling about him. Of course my gut feelings have been wrong in the past.
Click to expand...

If I were you, my gut feelings would say "Adams" as well.. LOL
 
I would not hate McW. I would not cry if the jazz draft him. a couple things that stuck out for me on the video (which I post first 8-))

- he has a low shooting percentage because he takes bad shots. he takes them contested and early in the shot clock (this is fixable)

- his handle is good but not great. he over dribbles at times and gets the ball stolen (this is fixable)

- he makes some very bone headed passes. this is what worries me the most. bb iq is tough to teach. he has a great feel for the game but doesn't seem to read what is going on on the court.

- Ty Corbin is NOT the coach to teach him these things. that is my biggest concern.

I am, as cy would say, getting a shower Boner for karasev. I love the guys stroke. he is a good passer. he has a basketball pedigree. (father played and coached in Russia). I know we need a pg but imagine, burks handling the ball. getting it to Hayward, who initiates the offense. burks can get cutting passes from karasev and Hayward. if he gets stopped by the bigs stepping out I am confident he can drop it to kanter or favors or kick it to karasev.
 
If MCW is your starting pg, then you're a mediocre team. He doesn't shoot, penetrate or have much change of pace. Now maybe he'll pick all that up at the next level, but at #14, there are better talents on the board. MCW is too risky.

Schroeder has show the ability to run a team, get past his defender and make open shots. That alone makes him seem less risky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHP
BHP said:
Haha not really, I would prefer Adams to go somewhere where they actually develop there young players
Click to expand...

Ouch! Be careful with your priority bro, this is still a JazzFanzz forum!!

It's not a "NZ_Young_NBA_Prospects_Fanzz Forum"

LOL..
 
Catchall said:
If MCW is your starting pg, then you're a mediocre team. He doesn't shoot, penetrate or have much change of pace. Now maybe he'll pick all that up at the next level, but at #14, there are better talents on the board. MCW is too risky.

Schroeder has show the ability to run a team, get past his defender and make open shots. That alone makes him seem less risky.
Click to expand...

Well to be honest witchu if Schroeder's attitude checks out, I'd go with Schroeder as well.

But if for some reason Dallas picks him before us, and MCW is there, I'd take him with open arms. They both bring different attributes to our team. Also like Rev. said, they all have some flaws in them, it's up to us to nurture their talent and makes their weakness, their strength.

I believe that these young players are our future, teach them well and let them lead the way, show them all the "potential" they possess inside... Give them a sense of pride and it'll make it easier to coach... Once they succeed they'd remind us how we'd always wanted them to be.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Well to be honest witchu if Schroeder's attitude checks out, I'd go with Schroeder as well.

But if for some reason Dallas picks him before us, and MCW is there, I'd take him with open arms. They both bring different attributes to our team. Also like Rev. said, they all have some flaws in them, it's up to us to nurture their talent and makes their weakness, their strength.

I believe that these young players are our future, teach them well and let them lead the way, show them all the "potential" they possess inside... Give them a sense of pride and it'll make it easier to coach... Once they succeed they'd remind us how we'd always wanted them to be.
Click to expand...

ahhhh hotttnickkk is waxing poetic.
 
I decided long ago.. never to rely on anyone else's "scouting" ..

If I failed, if I succeed, at least I say what I believe...

No matter what kind of Rep you give to me..

You can't take away my "fantasy"...

Because the greatest... draft of all.. is still coming up next year..

(so PKM says)

I've found the best... draft pick...

Is the one...

That's right for ... me....


(Thank you, thank you very much)
 
Catchall said:
Here's my prediction:

At 14, we take Olynyk, Schroeder or Goodwin (with an outside chance at KCP)

We sit back and watch who's there at 21. If there's someone we like at 17 or 18, we trade 21 and our 2nd pick to move up a few spots and call it a day.
Click to expand...

If Mason Plumlee is there, we have a very good chance of selecting him.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Ouch! Be careful with your priority bro, this is still a JazzFanzz forum!!

It's not a "NZ_Young_NBA_Prospects_Fanzz Forum"

LOL..
Click to expand...

And when did I say it is a NZ young NBA prospects fanzz forum, Im just saying I dont think he will fit in with the current jazz team, especially with Ty at the helm. So I think we need to draft players that can develop here and Adams is too much of a prospect at the moment.
 
BHP said:
And when did I say it is a NZ young NBA prospects fanzz forum, Im just saying I dont think he will fit in with the current jazz team, especially with Ty at the helm. So I think we need to draft players that can develop here and Adams is too much of a prospect at the moment.
Click to expand...

Well it sort of sounded like your boy Adams is too good for little 'ol Jazz...

I do agree we're slow at developing young talents though... but Favors & Kanter are coming along..
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Well it sort of sounded like your boy Adams is too good for little 'ol Jazz...

I do agree we're slow at developing young talents though... but Favors & Kanter are coming along..
Click to expand...

Nah wasnt saying that, was saying I dont think he would be a good pick by the jazz with the team the way it is currently,

Yeah favors and Kanter coming along nicely but I think they were ready to have a bigger role this year. The problem is that as you said earlier that we should be making their weaknesses their strengths but for Kanter and Favors their weaknesses are not becoming their strengths, And some of their strengths are being ignored by the coaching staff.
 
BHP said:
Nah wasnt saying that, was saying I dont think he would be a good pick by the jazz with the team the way it is currently,

Yeah favors and Kanter coming along nicely but I think they were ready to have a bigger role this year. The problem is that as you said earlier that we should be making their weaknesses their strengths but for Kanter and Favors their weaknesses are not becoming their strengths, And some of their strengths are being ignored by the coaching staff.
Click to expand...

Ahh.. you've been paying attention, I like that. Rep'd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top