What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

Trying to decide where proclaiming yourself as a top 3 college talent evaluator falls in the spectrum of condescending-statements

That would be more arrogance than condescending. You see, I wasn't trying to make somebody else look bad when I said it, I was just making myself look good. Soo...I would say me saying that wouldn't fall in the spectrum of condescending statements at all.
 
Not gonna lie-- one of the best Jazzfanz whiffs of all-time is seeing NUMB's Doomsday posts after Gordon Hayward was drafted ;)

I will say this, Kevin Garnett in his prime as a SF would probably be better than Gordon "MAX MONEY" Hayward has been.
 
That would be more arrogance than condescending. You see, I wasn't trying to make somebody else look bad when I said it, I was just making myself look good. Soo...I would say me saying that wouldn't fall in the spectrum of condescending statements at all.

Same **** different smell, tbh. Your shtick is both condescending and arrogant, and there's libraries of posts to justify both. I don't mind, personally, but I figured I'd call out BTP because his persistent attacks are unwarranted. If you think that makes me condescending, then I truly do not give two ****s.
 
I will say this, Kevin Garnett in his prime as a SF would probably be better than Gordon "MAX MONEY" Hayward has been.

Every body knows the greatest SF of all time is Batman.
.
.
.
.
.
super-friends.jpg
 
Same **** different smell, tbh. Your shtick is both condescending and arrogant, and there's libraries of posts to justify both. I don't mind, personally, but I figured I'd call out BTP because his persistent attacks are unwarranted. If you think that makes me condescending, then I truly do not give two ****s.

Have I made condescending posts? Absolutely.

Was the post that you brought up regarding me a condescending post? No, it was not.

Regardless of your thoughts, I just thought it was funny how you called somebody out on being condescending with a condescending post yourself. So like I said, your post was condescending, you (typically) are not.

If however you think that my thoughts on ONE of your posts define who I think of you as a person in total, then you've got some other issues that you need to deal with, bub.

/See that last sentence. That was condescending. Learn the difference between being condescending, and being sure of oneself.
//That was condescending too.
 
It's those ****ing STGers again, taking away our democracy and forcing healthcare on us
 
I never understood the personal attacks

right now if I was gm this is what my team would look like after next draft assuming jazz pick #3, #20 (gsw) and trade burks and rush for a pick in the teens.

Parker
young
Harris

Burke, Neto
Hayward, Harris
Parker, young
kanter, Williams (mid level deal)
favors, Gobert

way to many rookies
 
Not to spoil the love-fest here, but Catchall compared Archie Goodwin to Michael Jordan and thinks Kevin Garnett would be the best SF of all time.


I compared the 'fire in the eyes' Goodwin has to that of Jordan. I do think KG rocks as an unguardable SF in an all-time fantasy draft. But that idea doesn't get much traction.
 
I don't mind people ripping on me. It comes with the territory. Calling it 'inbred' and 'stupidity' and whatnot, seemed a bit much.
 
I compared the 'fire in the eyes' Goodwin has to that of Jordan. I do think KG rocks as an unguardable SF in an all-time fantasy draft. But that idea doesn't get much traction.

It gets MAJOR traction with me.

I compared the 'fire in the eyes' Goodwin has to that of Jordan. I do think KG rocks as an unguardable SF in an all-time fantasy draft. But that idea doesn't get much traction.

You say "fire" I say "hunger". Same thing. Agreed with this too.
 
Really like Jabari's game. A lot.

As a market that has a hard time getting players to choose us, Parker might be the guy for us to draft. He should fit in being LDS, he should feel right at home here and play his entire career here. Just get the prophet to comand him to stay, and for cheep:)
 
way to many rookies

That's a lot of rookies, yeah, but it's also a lot of guys who are going to demand over $10 mil one after another, and demand shots and minutes. Also, Young and Harris don't get enough minutes in your lineup. It's a log jam.

I get greedy and want to add Andrew Harrison or Dante Exum to that mix, even if it means giving up a big sooner or later. Maybe moving Kanter is just a bad idea. Will see.

But lets say we extend Hayward and then Kanter next year. We draft well in the next draft. Do we extend Burks or is he out the door? I guess we have three years before we have to think about extending Parker and the other new rookie, and we have two years after this season before we have to worry about Burke and Gobert. That gives us time to move someone. However, it's obvious that not everyone is going to get paid. This isn't like the Jazz of the past where we had three good players and other guys like CJ Miles. This is a situation where 6 or 7 guys deserve extensions and serious minutes. We probably can't keep everyone.
 
As a market that has a hard time getting players to choose us, Parker might be the guy for us to draft. He should fit in being LDS, he should feel right at home here and play his entire career here. Just get the prophet to comand him to stay, and for cheep:)

This. Great marketing opportunities too.
 
Back
Top